Analysis Of An Extraordinary Pair

From the vantage point of the present, it is easy to look back at the tenure of any great leader and draw conclusions about just what it was that made him/her great. We can examine the circumstances under which their leadership flourished; piece together what we know of their character and personality traits; delve into the factors that may have driven them; and dissect their leadership style all in an effort to pinpoint the source of their success. The ‘Great Man’ theory, popular in the 19th century and now thoroughly debunked, held that leaders are born, not made; suggesting that men like George Washington, Martin Luther King Jr., and Winston Churchill were born with the innate capacity to change the world (Landis,

He involves consulting with subordinates and asking for their suggestions in the decision-making process but also understands he at times must give direct orders that are not to be questioned. An example of his co-mingled style of leadership is evident in a scene where he explains the new mission to those under his authority. The new mission is to forget past procedures and get those boys back home. He also declares, "We have never lost an American in space and they sure as hell won 't lose one on his watch." This is a leader who is confident in his ability, while simultaneously inspiring the creative process needed by his crew to accomplish the group mission. In other words, he is successful in creating the right environment that will influence creativity and innovation but also keep the element of time as the main objective. An excellent example would be when he issues the order, "I want the power procedures now!" Therefore, he is a leader who can make a decision on the spot, get results on time, and allow the creative process to flow.

What characteristics do leaders embody? Leaders are considered to be strong and caring with no attention of being paid to their downfalls. In A Separate Peace, Phineas is a leader with flaws, despite his high standing amongst others. John Knowles characterizes Phineas as a naive and daring static character in his novel A “Separate Peace” by employing dialogue, action, and Gene’s descriptions and feelings towards him.

leaders is how each character uses a different method and style of leadership. As a leader Hazel uses rabbits strengths to accomplish goals. Hazel looks for a group to send to Efrafa, even though he wants to go but decides to send Holly instead because he is more fit for the job. Hazel tells the group, “I knew you wouldn’t let me go. I’m not the right fellow anyway-Holly is. He knows everything about moving in the open and he’ll be able to talk when he gets there”(195). This shows Hazel is willing to sacrifice what he wants for the best interest of the warren. General Woundwort in contrast, is obsessed with power and keeps his warren on lockdown at all times.

Established during the early 8th century, an artwork known as The Pair of Lokapala, translated as the heavenly guardians, shapes the essence of early Chinese dynasty art sculpture. The 40 ½ x 16 ½ x 11 ¾ inch sculpture is focused around the Tang Dynasty due to its prominent years dating from 618-907 A.D. Furthermore, the materials to create The Pair of Lokapala was used with earthenware with three color lead glazes. Although the artist is unknown, the style of the artwork stretches the styling of Chinese sculpture, showing that the artist used those values to create the artwork. Therefore, The Pair of Lokapala evokes various aspects through Tang Dynasty art by emphasizing two guardians through the subject matter, arranging many formal

By analyzing the leadership styles and character traits of Horatio Gates, a suitable general in the Continental Army, and George Washington, a virtuous man, an understanding of the necessary victory for America is perceived as the leaders are contrasted.

The purpose of this paper is to address how I, SSG Schumacher, have identified Major Robert Rogers as a legacy leader and a leader of influence in my military career as a non-commissioned officer and member of the military intelligence community. This paper will cover three main topics in which I will first discuss a brief history of the life of Major Rogers. Then, his impact on the evolution of warfare and leadership attributes on the United States Army. Finally, I will discuss how his leadership attributes led to him making an impact on the military today and Soldiers such as myself.

Building a movement always challenges the status quo. Leaders must act, they must willingly risk the things they love and unfortunately, many leaders are frozen by the lethargy of indecision i. Union General George B. McClellan, who was meticulous in his planning and preparations, was also known for not aggressively challenging his opponents on a fast-moving battlefield environment. He chronically overestimated the strength of the enemy and was reluctant to apply principles of mass,

Traditionally, analysis on roles for effective leadership surround corporate or military settings with clearly defined problems, discernable issues, and areas where hypothesis can be made, models formed, predictions tested, and outcomes verified. Analyzing a film like Seabiscuit for the roles of leadership present many interesting questions about leadership and what it means to be a leader. The film Seabiscuit chronicles the lives of individuals as they become intertwined to produce an outcome, training a horse to race. At what point do individuals stop seeing themselves, in their daily lives, as individuals and begin seeing themselves as members of groups having to take on leadership and

General Brooks was an extraordinary man who had a straight-forward influence on the US Army and established strategic leaders through mentorship. General Brooks served at the national-level in the Pentagon. Within Headquarters, Department of the Army, he fulfilled staff duties as aide-de-camp to the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, and later as the Army’s Chief of Public Affairs. Within The Joint Staff, he fulfilled duties as Deputy Director (J5) for Political-Military Affairs for the Western Hemisphere, and later as the Deputy

Greenleaf takes a very direct approach in presenting his beliefs about leadership. He speaks in absolutes. Using headings in his writings, he addresses a specific component of leadership and explicitly states what he means in the succeeding paragraphs. Leaving little room for subjection or argumentation, Greenleaf does not pose open-ended questions towards his readers, but rather, speaks with an assertive tone that makes his ideas sound factual. Congruently, many facts are presented throughout Greenleaf’s writing, giving readers a reliable platform on which to found their beliefs. Greenleaf writes:

In 1992 Sir Peter dela Billiere was quoted as Strenght of personality is always likely to be part of the DNA of top leaders. He based this around his research around military structure throughout history ,sir Peter was throughout his career an very well respected Military officer who has spoken at many Buiness conventions on leadership .

My entire life I’ve always felt different because of my ADHD and my twice exceptionality. And for those of you who don’t know twice exceptionality is when a gifted child also has a learning disability. My twice exceptionality manifest as extreme ADHD and extremely fast information processing as in faster than 99% of the globe along with very good verbal skills. There is another side to this coin, I also have extremely bad ADHD. This sometimes makes me feel alienated when I’m talking to more normal that I don’t feel I can relate to. But some of the effects of this are strengths and I enjoy these. I have can an intellectual conversation to anyone because of my processing speed and my enormous vocabulary. My information processing and verbal skills have made me funny, good at rapping, outgoing and good at making

The year is 1865 and the Civil War death toll has risen just over six-hundred-thousand men. The freedoms sought out by our nation’s founders, now jeopardized by the secession of eleven states from the Union. The fate of The United States of America now laid upon the broad shoulders of our nations sixteenth commander-in-chief, President Abraham Lincoln. In a term marked by the burden of complete social upheaval, Abraham Lincoln was our nation’s foremost leader. The lawyer from Illinois navigated the only internal war in American history by embodying the principals taught by Professor Grint, utilizing a model of distributed leadership to gather

His depiction of a good leader to have both the qualities of a man and a beast according to the reading, “…as they had for a teacher one who was half beast and half man, so it is necessary for a prince to know how to make use of both natures, and that one without the other is not durable” (Machiavelli 202). So, it means that a good leader should be able to know when to follow orders as a man and when to act in brute force as a beast, as well as finding the balance to his two natures and utilize them accordingly. Similarly, Don Collier’s leadership trait “dependability” is related to Machiavelli’s qualities of a man, for they both depict a sense of order in mankind and how they are depended on to complete their task/ role as a man. Correspondingly, Collier’s leadership trait of “decisiveness” is linked to Machiavelli’s qualities of a beast, for as a beast follows merely its basic instinct. As for Collier, his instinct is to kill any Nazi Germans that will cause harm to his men’s and followers, no matter if it is men, women, or