Analysis Of April Morning By Howard Fast

When it comes to the topic of the American Revolution most have been educated about the significant battles of the war, and the overall outcome. However, submerged beneath the details of war are the individual stories of those living in the colonies. In Rae Raphael’s book, A People’s History of the American Revolution, the personal stories and experiences of the “common folk” are brought back to the surface for the first time. Recounting these personal stories utilizing primary literature provides a necessary accuracy in portraying this time period. The experiences of farmers, laborers, women, Native Americans, and slaves, among others are used to highlight the effects of the revolution caused by the historically overlooked people inhabiting the colonies.

Reverend Hale is an expert in witchcraft and all that is supernatural. He has come to practice his art by finding witches and expelling the presence of Lucifer from Salem as told in his introduction starting at the bottom of page 30. He believes as the church believes that witchcraft is a forbidden crime and must be exterminated, even if it means hanging people he does not wish to hang. When the accusations and rulings start to become unjust, he starts to see that his previous beliefs are wrong and that the court as well as the town has gone mad so he leaves the court as seen on page 111. He begins to feel responsible for this and tries to defend those that he knows are good people. When the court starts to not even listen to him, he begins to convince people to confess just so that they should save their lives.

'Harwood's poems explore the impact of time and change on the reassessment of one's identity.'

In the exciting novel, “1776” by David McCullough, McCullough puts faces and emotions to the commemorated events of the Revolutionary war, which makes this novel overpowering even when the outcome is already known. I choose this extraordinary book, due to the fact of how McCullough writes about the significant events, how he introduces many characters that at first overwhelming but he makes sure you remember them due to that they are very significant throughout the whole story and how McCullough manifests the events of the war. With McCullough’s previous work called, “John Adams”, this book acts as a counterpart to his work as to how this book has a rigid military view compared to a political view.

Patrick Henry, one of the most, if not the most, influential politicians of eighteenth century America, wrote, and presented, the Speech in the Virginia Convention during a time of tension between Britain and its Colonies. As a spokesman of the independence movement, Henry continuously faced the threat of persecution by the British, yet he carried on expressing his beliefs explicitly until he earned the opportunity to attend the Virginia Convention, in which he respectfully, but courageously, argued that war with the British was inevitable. In doing this, he rallied the colonists into a fighting spirit, and one month later, the Revolutionary war had begun. Through his use of political rhetorical devices, such as, ethos, pathos, logos, and his infamous fallacy, Patrick Henry influences not only the colonists’ mindsets, but also their actions against the British King.

Reverend Samuel Parris- Parris is a widow in the mid 40’s. Parris is also considered a bad person in Salem. Parris is very greedy and selfish. Reputation is a big priority.

The American Revolution is almost like the civil war but, it is split in three parts instead of two, happened in late 1700s. The movie, The Patriot, is a fictional movie that shows us the battles and life during American Revolution. Some people were forced to fight because their family members died and some did not fight because they did not wanted to risk their family even though both sides are die-hearted patriot. Family could make people do anything. The producers of the movie The Patriot, Dean Devlin, Mark Gordon, and Gary Levinsohn, chose a composite of different colonists, like Francis Marion, Colonel Daniel Morgan, Elijah Clark, Thomas Sumter, and Andrew Pickens, to make Benjamin Martin look better and the hero with no fault what-so-ever.

Patrick Henry, in his speech to those gathered at the Virginia Convention and president Peyton Randolph, explains how the United States needs to fight in the Revolutionary War. Henry supports his statement by describing how important it is to answer the call for war. The author’s purpose is to emphasize how the war is inevitable in order to convince the president that they should definitely fight in it. Henry speaks in an inspirational and patriotic tone to those listening in on his speech. He establishes many rhetorical strategies to influence the president's decision including rhetorical questions, anaphora, and repetition. Henry emphasizes how the war cannot be avoided and tries to inspire the audience to fight in the war by addressing the

Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly” (King 1). Martin Luther King, Jr. established his duty as a leader to be in Birmingham, first for organizational ties, and second, because the injustice in Birmingham indirectly affected African Americans everywhere. Additionally, Osborn addressed the way Dr. King was titled in the response from the clergymen. “The statement to which King was responding, signed by eight leaders representing various religious faiths, had in fact not even mentioned him or acknowledged his identity as a pastor, certainly not as an equal” (26). This excerpt examined the fact that although the target of the clergymen’s letter was apparent, the men remained so adamantly immoral that they refused to even slightly regard Reverend King as an equal. This disgrace has no obvious effect on Mr. King, for he introduces himself as an equal, despite the opinions of the clergymen. “Thus, from the outset, King asserts his identity and claims his seat at their table, whether welcome or not . . . .” (Osborn 26). Through careful placement of adjectives here and there, King efficiently labels himself as an equal. “I also hope that circumstances will soon make it possible for me to meet each of you, not as an integrationist or a civil rights leader, but as a fellow clergyman and a Christian brother” (7). The words “fellow clergyman” and “Christian brother,” especially, help Dr. Martin Luther King,

Thomas Paine’s The American Crisis was written as a sixteen-pamphlet sequence during the Revolutionary War era. Through his writing, Paine expresses his feelings over Britain’s control over the colonies. Essentially, his purpose is to rouse the colonists and soldiers to rise up to take further action against Britain’s tyranny. Therefore, The American Crisis utilizes Paine’s and God’s credibility to convince readers to take action, appeals to their logic through analogies, and evokes emotional rage from the colonists against the British.

Reverend Hale believes that his faith will lead him to the truth in Salem, but he will soon realise that corruption can destroy anyone's faith.

In the book 1776, the author, David McCullough remains unbiased in describing a monumental and historical year. This work of nonfiction starts with background information in October 1775, starring King George Ⅲ and his views on the war with the rebels. McCullough takes the reader on a journey back in time to 1776, where a story unfolds about important battles, where there were losses and wins. Clearly demonstrated in this book are both sides of this war. From the rebels experiencing hardships and a plethora of diseases, to the rise of this newfound army, and the British’s declining army, this book captivates you, leaving you craving to learn more. We would have never experienced this journey if it wasn’t for the exceptional leaders such as Nathaniel Greene and George Washington leading the Americans in their fight for independence from Great Britain.

In the story Across Five Aprils by Irene Hunt, the author thinks about the historical accuracy of the war and wants to show some galore. She talks about when neighbors fought against neighbors and when brothers fought against brothers. She sends the letter to the family when Bill says he didn’t fire the shot that killed Tom. So she uses both to make this novel even more interesting.

Samuel Adams once said, "It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." In Bunker Hill, Nathaniel Philbrick chronicles how the conflagration of the American Revolution would erupt from the embers of the past focusing on the great impact that those involved in the infamous battle for which the book is titled and the battle itself would have on the colonies and their fight for liberties. This is a vivid bildungsroman for the city of Boston, teeming with new thoughts and ideals, that would face internal conflict, which would later give the city the title “the Cradle of Freedom.”1 Setting aside the legends of the revolution, Philbrick presents not only a historic event in American history, but also the subtle, essential moments that are not limited to 1775 but are the underpinning “mechanics of overthrowing a regime” that “are essentially the same today as they were in the eighteenth century;” however, focusing on our mythic Founding Fathers, many overlook the true nature of the war that is present in every revolution.2

In “On the Pulse of Morning”, Angelou uses visual imagery and symbolism to argue that people must learn from the past to eliminate racial injustice in society today. The vivid descriptions found in the poem evoke feelings of injustice through the emotionally painful pictures that they paint. Americans as a whole are described in the poem to have “crouched too long in / The bruising darkness, [...] / Face down in ignorance” (“On the Pulse of Morning” 15-18). The speaker of the poem insinuates that “humans have been hiding, [...] afraid of what they might learn” from history (“On the Pulse of Morning”, 1998, 3: 276). The bestial visual of a person “crouching” takes away the humanity of the subjects, and the description of “bruising darkness” calls to mind the dark times of slavery over a hundred years prior. The image evokes a feeling that Americans have made terrible mistakes in the past that have not yet been corrected. They have committed terrible, animalistic acts in the blackened cover of history. These people refuse to look up and accept what has been done. The shadows of slavery and the pain caused by it are still ubiquitous in modern society, and if humans do not stop hiding from the truth, they cannot right the wrongs that have been committed. In order for the ignorance to end, people must accept the continuing prevalence of injustice. Not only does Angelou use detailed descriptions, but her use of symbolism allows the reader to see the injustice in society through