Analysis Of Bag Ban Bad For Freedom And Environment

As I read the passage I was able to pick up some key points that helped me understand how messed up and twisted the government was. For example in paragraph 3 of the “tinker v. Des Moines Independent community” it saids “I have never believed that any person has a right to give speeches or engage in demonstrations where he pleases and when he pleases”. It seems almost as if the government is trying to limit the citizens right. To make a connection this reminds

He goes on to use pathos in the 2nd paragraph with the quote “their sons and their brothers and their husbands to fight and die in extraordinarily high proportions” he does this in this quote by putting a identity on the soldier that is fighting in the war. This uses people's emotions to get people to speak against the war. He continues to use the emotions

He calls out to the loving, protective parents of America saying that “we can have no joy, knowing that this government is not sufficiently lasting to ensure any thing which we may bequeath to posterity.” (22). He believes that the strife of revolution would bring many years of peace and prosperity for the generations to come and anything otherwise would be “leaving the sword to our children” (26). This use of pathos forced families to be selfless for their children’s sake, to give them a better

After a bill that would ban plastic bags in California was shot down, Adam B. Summers, author of, “Bag Ban Bad for Freedom and Environment,” explains how plastic bags should not be banned. He uses statistics, ethos, logos and diction to support his claim. Summers uses these devices to create a stronger argument. Summers overall purpose of his passage was to express his view that plastic bags should not be banned and the effects banning or not banning them would have on the environment. By using statistics, Summers creates a more credible argument.

He states that there are thousands who have their own opinions and didn’t agree with slavery and the war, yet in the result they do nothing to put an end to it. Also they change the question of freedom. This explains that people have the rights to choose, vote, etc. but because many are afraid to oppose the government they choose not do to anything about it.

In his book there are many examples such as.. “ Can this be true? This is the twentieth century not the middle ages, who would allow such crimes to be committed? How could the world remain silent?”(pg.118) In this section he was talking about how the holocaust was going on at the time. He was saying that nobody was trying to stop it and let it continue. “Human rights are being violated on every continent more people are oppressed than free.”(pg.119) When he said this he is saying that there is madness everywhere. People are being locked up and forced to be slaves everywhere all over the world, and more people are locked up than there are people free. “ Why did he write this book? To keep history from repeating itself and also to leave his legacy behind” (pg. vii) In this quote he was being asked why did he write this book over what he went through. He responded by basically saying that he wanted to tell how severe and crucial things were so

Due to the proximal ban of plastic bags in California, Adam B. Summers argues the reasons why they should not be banned in his article, “Bag Ban Bad for Freedom and Environment”. In order to build his argument, Summers includes an effective use of factual data and evidence, relating to the audience, and appealing to the audience’s emotion.

The lack of action to fight for their freedoms is concerning for both speakers in these examples. In her article, Paretsky addresses the amount of restrictions the government has put into today’s literature. She identifies the fears authors , like herself, have when they decide what to put in their books. She warns our society to not ignore the government taking our liberties. Paretsky indicates how even in today’s society it is very hard to fight for our freedom, and risk going to “prison” if we have the courage to do so. In Fahrenheit 451, Faber tells Montag about his own silence when their society began to banish books from their world. He explains that he was “one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen

In relation to the environmental factor, this regulation was put forward due to the amount of plastic bags handed out by supermarkets in England as in 2014 it rose to 7.64 billion-200 million more than in 2013. Campaigners argued that the bags blight streets, spoil the countryside, and damage

In the argumentative essay “Bag Ban Bad for Freedom and Environment”, produced by the author Adam B. Summers, it narrowly focuses on the topic of the banning of plastic bags. The author illustrates the ban is bad can affect society in many ways. Adam provides the information through various amounts of stylistic elements, tools, word choice and so on

To begin, he uses emotional appeal to create powerful imagery to persuade the reader that celebrating freedom is wrong when slavery still exists. He announces, “fellow citizens, above your national, tumultuous joy, I hear the mournful wail of millions, whose chains, heavy and grievous yesterday, are today rendered more intolerable by the jubilant shouts that reach them” (para. 4). By creating a picture in the audience’s mind of other people’s cries of freedom deriding slaves, they begin to feel ashamed for being so cheerful while African Americans have no liberty.

Each year there is an increase in demands for plastic bags, and therefore more are shipped, creating further environmental pollution concerns. This increase in demand has lead to the phenomenal upsurge in the use and misuse of plastic bags globally, both in developed and developing countries. Statistics show that 4 to 5 trillion plastic bags are produced per annum, whereby North America and Western Europe account for nearly 80% (Geographical, 2005; Reusable Bags, 2005). Cheeseman (2007) states that approximately “380 billion plastic shopping bags are used in the United States annually”; in turn, only 0.6% of this is recycled.

In the article, "Plastic bags are killing us", the author Katharine Mieszkowski stated, "The plastic bag is an icon of convenience culture, by some estimates the single most ubiquitous consumer item on Earth, numbering in the trillions."

As the United States deals with the overwhelming amounts of waste building up, Nitin et al explain that “plastics take anywhere from 15 to 1000 years to biodegrade” once they are discarded (Nitin). Changes in recycling methods can no longer keep up with the exorbitant amount of waste produced in the United States. This is why some states choose to take their initiative one step further by placing either fees or a ban on the use of plastic bags. Due to the enormous waste the United States produces on a daily basis and the negative outcomes of this trash including adverse health effects, harmful impacts on nature, and the exponential piling of trash in landfills, the US government should ban plastic bags.

Five hundred billion used globally and one hundred billion of them end up in U.S. landfills, taking about one thousand years to decompose, but only 5.2 percent were recycled (Borrud, 2007, p.75).-These are the figures plastic bags have produced every year. Human beings invented plastic bags for the convenience of carriers and packers. However, just as other great inventions, say, nuclear energy and biotechnology, plastic bags are causing serious issues like global warming, environment pollution and energy consumption. They are gradually becoming sword towards ourselves. In responding to this problem, the city of San Francisco has become the trail blazer to prohibit non-biodegradable plastic bags in its large supermarkets and pharmacies.