Analysis Of Bill ' Sb 575 ' By Larry Taylor

In 1954, the Kansas- Nebraska Act was passed. Northern Democrat Steven Douglass in an attempt to build a transcontinental railroad petitioned the Kansas-Nebraska act on the bases that the Compromise of 1850 validated popular sovereignty. In Douglass’s opinion the Compromise of 1850 made the Missouri Compromise of 1820 void. There was opposition from Northern politicians who believed that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a sacred pact made by previous lawmakers during the union’s long history of compromises. For Southern politicians the Kansas- Nebraska Act would help the extension of slavery which most of the Northerners were against. Ignoring the wishes of the Northerners and pushing the Democratic agenda which wanted not only the

H.R.7 No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2017 is a proposed legislation that would put the Hyde Amendment into permanent affect (govtrack2017). This would ban all federal funds and all federally funded health care coverages from paying for elective abortions (congress2017). The only time the coverage of an abortion would be covered is if the mother was raped, incest had occurred, or the mother’s life was at risk (Congress2017). This legislation would also make it illegal for someone to get an abortion by a federal employee or at a federal clinic (govtrack2017). Despite the abortion taking place, whether it was legal or illegal, insurance would cover any complications (policy.house). The No

As a Canadian in today’s society we believe we have a certain set of inalienable rights. One of those rights that seem to be at the forefront of the 2015 Canadian election is privacy. As Dr. Kent Roach and Dr. Craig Forcese state, “privacy is, in our society, the right to be left alone by the state.” The Conservative upbringing of Bill C-51 challenges the ideology around our right to be private, as well as our government’s role in the protection of Canada from threats of terrorism. The Harper government essentially, will increase their role in national security to keep a constant watchful eye on potentially harmful situations and end them before anyone is hurt or killed. If passed, the bill would allow the government to arrest anyone suspected of terrorism without that person even committing a crime. Furthermore, the language used in the bill is extremely vague and makes one question, where the line will be drawn? Will our basic rights to peaceful protest and free speech be affected? Unfortunately perhaps they will. One of the most concerning parts of the bill in regard to privacy is the fact that the government will now be able to access several sensitive documents about citizens from top agencies such as the Public Health Agency, Canadian Border Services Agency as well as the Canadian Border Services Agency. Privacy is changing in Canada. This is a landmark bill and as such it is creating quite a splash in the ongoing Canadian Election.

Roy Blunt’s petition to defund Planned Parenthood would ultimately lead to less access to care for those below the poverty line and increase the number of abortions by removing Planned Parenthood’s free contraceptive program.

At the commencement of her piece, Morris discusses TRAP laws in great detail, mentioning how they’re practically unnoticeable to the American public and how they place multitudinous restrictions on abortion providers. Through her explanation, Morris is able to raise awareness of the issue, which is important because her article was written briefly before the 2016 presidential election, where the matter of abortion would be discussed thoroughly. However, to add on to her statement that TRAP laws are inconsiderate and unjust, Morris relies on the professional insight of Greater Ohio’s Planned Parenthood CEO, Stephanie Kight, who argues that Ohio lawmakers have no concern for what women who require abortions will do, and that

The U.S. House of Representative Bill 610 is sponsored by Representative Steve King and the House committee is Education and the Workforce. This bill was put into place for “distributing Federal funds for elementary and secondary education in the form of vouchers for eligible students and to repeal a certain rule relating to nutrition standards in schools” (Smith.) The significance behind putting this bill into place is to provide a “better” way of education an to get rid of the “waste” we “currently” have in our eduational system. The U.S. House of Representatives should not pass Bill 610 because it detroys many basic American rights set in the Constitution, cuts all “special” classes and other educational funding, and cuts free/reduced lunches

What will happen if proposition 55 (prop. 55) fails and we won’t be able to tax the wealthiest Californians? David Kersten, in “Leading Taxpayer Advocate Makes Strong Case Against Prop.55 Tax Hike,” finds that “Accelerated Exodus” --a name for prop. 55-- is basically doubling the size of prop. 30, a passed proposition that increased income tax on the wealthiest Californians in 2012. Essentially, prop. 55 is a permanent increase in income taxes; this is causing quite a stir in the state’s business circle because it will accelerate the exodus, or removal, of capital and jobs leaving California. Prop. 55 shows taxes are never temporary; California Senator Jerry Brown promised in 2012 that the increases would be temporary, petering out after 2018.

Unfortunately, these policies align to Ivey’s opinion of abortion. In 2013, Governor Ivey supported an Arizona law banning abortion after 20 weeks. Fortunately, the 9th Circuit denied the law’s constitutionality. In response to the court’s denial to make this law valid, Ivey stated that the law was “common sense.” However, for many marginalized groups of women, these laws don’t make sense; they just keep them from accessing the care they need. With abortion already so difficult to access in our state, we don’t need more barriers for Alabamians to access the resources that they

John Conyers HR-40 is designed to study the long-term effects of the historical truth of African enslavement. Despite the historical accuracy of the occurrence of large-scale enslavement the questionable correlation with present day socio-economic averages is not a justifiable reason to conduct a laborious analysis of a subjective discussion. Coates provides no data on other ethnic groups which have achieved upward mobility. The only discussion he is lobbying to intensify is the stagnant level which African-Americans remain. The most recent data Coates provides is the Wells Fargo mortgage scandal which is adequate evidence of the continued discriminatory behavior in the housing market.

In her “The New Scarlet Letter -- A is for Abortion”(2011), Linda Bergthold argues that the passing of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, as well as the Hyde Amendment, not only berates women who consider abortion an option to an unpremeditated pregnancy, but also may financially “overwhelm” and metaphorically cripple the expecting mother. Bergthold provides statistical evidence in which she states the outrageous cost of having an abortion, and the “stupid” idea of abortion coverage in insurance policies due to the fact that one does not “plan on having an abortion when they sign up for insurance coverage”; not to mention the fact that it may not work as planned in the new health system. Bergthold aims to disprove those who are attempting to

On June 25th, 2013, Wendy Davis of Emily’s group held an eleven hour long obstruction in order to stop the Senate Bill 5 from allowing it to be passed. This Bill would’ve made if difficult for women to have abortions in Texas. Most clinics would have been shut down if the Senate Bill 5 wasn’t passed.

The issue of abortion is notoriously controversial. Since the Supreme Court’s 1992 ruling in Casey v. Planned Parenthood, states have enacted different restrictions on the procedure. These restrictions vary from state to state. Nineteen states currently have laws prohibiting partial-birth abortion, and forty-one states strictly prohibit abortions except in cases of life-endangerment. One particularly incendiary area of abortion law is that of public funding. However, as of this year there are only seventeen states that cover abortion procedures through public funding. In this paper we will discuss federal abortion legislation, while describing the laws and political ideologies of the following states: Texas, California, New

In the past few decades, the issue of abortion rights has created debates and controversy within the United States. Those who criticize the act of abortion – pro-life – argue that the act of abortion is equivalent to the murder of a baby. Those who support the legalization of abortion – pro-choice – argues women should be able to choose whether or not they want to have an abortion. Currently, abortion is legal in all states – a result of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe vs. Wade. However, it has become increasingly common for states to create anti-abortion laws, which makes it more difficult to have an abortion. In 2014, Missouri state representative Rick Brattin proposed H.B.131, a house bill that would require women to receive a written consent from the biological father in order to have an abortion. This bill serves to prevent women from having an abortion.

First of all in a topic in the “MSNBC Equality/Health” talks about a law forcing doctors to lie to patients about abortion. It states”while the american public focused on the controversial “religious freedom” bill passed in Indiana last month, two other states also made far-reaching and dangerous political moves: Arizona Gov. Doug Dacey and Arkansas Gov. Asa

Now we will discuss the Media Article on Contraception, why are we debating birth control again retrieved from (“Why Are We Debating Birth Control … Again? | Boston Magazine" 2012). In 2012 the fight over access to birth control was thought to be over a long time ago and U.S. Citizens would have never thought it would be a problem. In 1967, Bill Baird the founder of Pro Choice League was arrested for giving spermicidal foam to a Boston University student. His case went through the Supreme Court System where it resulted in making birth control legal in the United States regardless of their marital status. In February 2012 Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown co wrote The Blunt Amendment. The Blunt Amendment is a