Analysis Of Characters In A Jury Of Her Peers

Literature work always has some lesson for the people that could even leave a thought-provoking effect on their lives and compel them to understand the reality of the world. However, there are some people, who just read literature as a source of entertainment, but the real meaning, of the reading or encountering any literature work, is realized when a reader understands a message. Which writer intends to give to a reader. It is because the literature work has a connection, in addition, influence on the character building process.

The short story “A Jury of Her Peers” written by Susan Glaspell showed many different aspects of symbolism. Millie Wright is symbolized a traditional woman that lost her way because she is consumed in her many wifely duties. Throughout the story her living situation, her red rocking chair, and her yellow canary had significant symbolic interest. Minnie Wright’s environment is a lonesome-looking place. “It was in a hollow, and the poplar trees around it were lonesome- looking trees(Glaspell 243). At the Wrights’ home there were no children running around to make noise, no telephone to talk with friends and family, no visitors, and most importantly no husband to show her affection. Mr. Wright had a cold attitude, unsociable, and careless demeanor. Mrs. Wright is consumed in her farmer’s wife duties she loses herself. The broken stove displays the lack of instability. The dirty kitchen with the

Interpretive fiction is a way of writing in which the writer’s goal is to help take the reader deeper into the real world and provoke our thoughts, broadening our awareness of life and our perspective. Many stories are examples of interpretive fiction because they give the reader not only the fictional ideology, but also some insight on real-world issues and make the reader take the time to think about what is the big meaning behind each and every story. Miss Brill, written by Katherine Mansfield and Identities, written by Wd Valgardson are both short stories that are examples of interpretive fiction. Both of these stories have a deeper meaning related to the misjudgement of others, the effects it has on people, and the reality of how people perceive the world and each other. One’s self-perception differs from reality and often one only learns this reality through the collective perceptions of the world with which we interact. Unfortunately, some of these perceptions can be guided by judgement.

In Susan Glaspell’s, “A Jury of her Peers”, it is the women who take center stage and captivate the reader’s emotions. Throughout the feministic short story, which was written in 1917, several repeating patterns and symbols help the audience to gain a deeper understanding of the difficulty of prairie life for women and of the bond that women share. The incredible cunning the women in the story demonstrate provides insight into the innate independence that women had even during days of deep sexual discrimination. In “A Jury of her Peers”, the hardships women of the early twentieth century must endure and the sisterhood that they can still manage to maintain are manifested as a mysterious, small-town murder unfolds.

In “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, Minnie Foster Wright is the main character, even though the reader never sees Mrs. Wright. The story begins as Mrs. Hale joins the county attorney, Mr. Henderson; the sheriff, Mr. Peters; Mrs. Peters; and her husband in a “big two-seated buggy” (188). The team men are headed the Wright house to investigate Mr. Wright’s murder. Mrs. Peters is going along to gather some belongings for Mrs. Wright, who is currently being held in jail, and Mrs. Hale has been asked to accompany Mrs. Peters. As the investigation is conducted throughout the story, the reader is given a sense of how women were treated during this time and insight into why the women ultimately keep evidence from the men.

“A Jury of Her Peers,” is a story about a farmer’s wife who is accused of murdering her husband. Referred to fundamentally as a writer, Glaspell's short fiction went to a great extent unnoticed until 1973 when her short story, "A Jury of Her Peers" was rediscovered. Despite the fact that the creator of forty-three short stories, Glaspell's "A Jury of Her Peers" is her most broadly anthologized bit of short fiction and is dependent upon a real court case Glaspell secured as a news person for the Des Moines Daily. The story, which she acclimates from her one-enactment play Trifles in 1917, has pulled in the consideration of feminist researchers for its medication of sexual orientation related topics. On its surface, "A

The world contains myriads of different people, therefore, it is not unlikely that some feel the need to identify themselves with fictional characters. Fabricating characters can be perceived as the most intricate part of writing because many consider characters to be the heart of pieces of literature. Authors establish protagonists and antagonists in their works which gives them the ability to sway the readers in the direction of who to root for. Many subconsciously discover themselves in fictional characters, this allows them to enjoy their seemingly realistic read further. This is the use of literary realism — the authentic representation of literature realistically. Connecting with a character makes one further immersed in their reading as they hope to understand more about not only the reader but themselves. Relatable characters can be vital in literature as it makes the reader feel that their novel or short story could actually take place. In Katherine Mansfield’s short story, “A Dill Pickle”, a run in at a cafe between two old lovers is filled with vacillation. Readers can feel themselves identify with the protagonist, Vera, as she endures a well known uncomfortable situation. During the realization of lost love, with the aid of literary realism, Mansfield depicts Vera as a relatable character to readers through her personal thoughts, flashbacks, and her loneliness.

“A Jury of Her Peers” is a short story written by Susan Glaspell in 1917 illustrates early feminist literature. The two female characters, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, is able to solve the mystery of who the murderer of John Wright while their male counterparts could not. This short story had been adapted from Glaspell’s one-act play Trifles written the previous year. The play consists of the same characters and plotline as the story. In both works, Glaspell depicts how the men, Sheriff Peters and Mr. Hale, disregard the most important area in the house, the kitchen, when it comes to their investigation. In the end, the women are the ones who find clues that lead to the conclusion of Minnie Wright, John Wright’s wife, is the one who murdered him. Both of Glaspell’s female characters illustrate the ability to step into a male dominated profession by taking on the role of detective. According to Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide, written by Lois Tyson, a reader-response critique “focuses on readers’ response to literary texts” and it’s a diverse area (169). Through a reader-response criticism from a feminist lens, we are able to analyze how “A Jury of Her Peers” and Trifles depict how a patriarchal society oppresses women in the early twentieth century, gender stereotypes confined both men and women and the emergence of the New Woman is illustrated.

From beginning to end, Susan Glaspell’s 1917 short story “A Jury of Her Peers,” has several repetitive patterns and symbols that help the reader gain a profound understanding of how hard life is for women at the turn-of-the-century, as well as the bonds women share. In the story two women go with their husbands and county attorney to a remote house where Mr. Wright has been killed in his bed with a rope and he suspect is Minnie, his wife. Early in the story, Mrs. Hale sympathizes with Minnie and objects to the way the male investigators are “snoopin’ round and criticizin’ ” her kitchen. In contrast, Mrs. Peters, the Sheriffs wife, shows respect for the law, saying that the men are doing “no more than their duty”. However, by the end of the story Mrs. Peters unites with Mrs. Hale in a conspiracy of silence and concealing evidence. What causes this dramatic transformation?

Susan Glaspell's short story, A Jury of Her Peers, was written long before the modern women's movement began, yet her story reveals, through Glaspell's use of symbolism, the role that women are expected to play in society. Glaspell illustrates how this highly stereotypical role can create oppression for women and also bring harm to men as well.

The result of these characteristics give each story suspense and mystery, leaving the readers wondering what each character will do next and what further action will take place. Characters hold a primary role in determining the outcome of a story, which is the reasoning behind the many similarities and differences among literary characters. Also, a clear example is the similar plots with two completely different outcomes. Once the audience understands a character, they are capable of building on their existing knowledge to foreshadow events or understand the text more logically, which is evident when reading these

The wicked witch, the stepmother, the damsel in distress, the fair maiden, the prince. All these stock characters are well known. Flat and shallow, they are only either evil, repressive, distressed, fair, or kind. They are known because they are seen everywhere. But what do they teach or show about human nature. Do these “people” make provoke thought or do they fill a role for a plot? Emphasizing who they are, not what they do, “literary fiction writers are more concerned with complex characters then the mechanics of plot” (Arp 161). Characterization in a literary fiction book explores human nature and psychology, allowing not only the analysis of the characters in the book but the people in real life.

“A Jury of Her Peers” tells the story of two men and their wives discovering the details of a murder scene. While the men search for blatantly obvious clues around the scene, the women notice small details that piece together the story of why Minnie strangled her husband John in his sleep. The story revolves around the gender roles that the women were forced into. These roles helped them to understand what Minnie was going through and what happened to her husband. The irony in the differences between the women’s roles and their husbands is what solved the case.

Interpretive fiction is a way of writing in which the writer’s goal is to help take the reader deeper into the real world and provoke our thoughts, broadening our awareness of life, and our perspective. Many stories are interpretive fiction because they give the reader not only the fictional ideology, but also some insight on real-world issues and tend to really make the reader take the time to think about what is the big meaning behind each and every story. “Miss Brill” written by Katherine Mansfield and Identities, written by Wd Valgardson are both short stories that are examples of interpretive fiction. Both of these stories have a deeper meaning related to the misjudgement of others, the effects it has on people, and the reality of how people perceive the world and each other. One’s self-perception differs from reality and often one only learns this reality through the collective perceptions of the world with which we interact. Unfortunately, some of these perceptions can be guided by judgement.

Can you imagine a story where the characters light up the pages, with their very presence? Characters are a significant, as they express the emotions of people, and influence readers tremendously. Reading for character is a higher-level skill because “analyzing characterization is more difficult than describing plot, for human character is infinitely complex, variable, and ambiguous” (Arp 161). Like in most interpretive fictional stories, Susan Glaspell’s short story “A Jury of Her Peers,” the reader sees richness in the characterization of three women: Minnie Foster Wright who is accused of murdering her husband, Mrs. Hale who is Minnie’s childhood friend, and Mrs. Peters the wife of the local sheriff. Through an in depth portrayal of the setting, as well as the characters' outlooks, feelings, and passions; Glaspell divulges the story's real underlying conflict and theme, which is constant subjugation and inequality in a male dominated society.