Analysis Of Childfree By Choice

The one child policy is a horrible law. The one child policy was instituted on September 25, 1980 in China a little more than 34 years ago. The one child policy limits every family to having one child only, to reduce population growth. There are endless reasons on why the one child policy is a very negative law. Gender inequalities, forced abortions, and not enough young people to take care of the elderly are just some of the many problems with the one child policy. The one child policy is one of the most ridiculous things that has ever happened.

Many people who have married each other find out many months later that the one that they are with just was not the one who they will love forever and be with forever. If they had chosen to have a child then the child will have to deal with parents who are trying to find a new couple and may even do it all over again. Also disease is not a joke that goes away over a wish people are born with genetic diseases that will transfer over to their child. My opinion of remaining childfree goes along with the author Kelly W. Who has strong evidence towards the thought of remaining childfree by

There are many reasons and scenarios to why people may have difficulties in raising a child. Financial reasons may be one of the major reasons people consider abortions or adoptions. It cost a fairly decent amount of money to raise a child and provide for it. In some tragic cases women decide to have an abortion or an adoption due to rape. In such a case it is almost conceivable to consider that as being an exception. Premarital relations and teenage pregnancies are other reasons as to why one would choose either of these alternatives. No teenager wants to be a parent or be forced to grow up while they are still in their youth. In today’s society, the

Is it okay to kill a child never born? Is it okay to deprive a mother of giving breath to another life? It is okay to burden an only child’s shoulders with responsibilities?A one child policy would inflict these issues upon many families. Although there are credible arguments to support each side of the debate, it is clearly inappropriate for the government to enact one-child legislation in order to control the population.

Just because someone says they are ready to have kids doesn’t mean they are actually mature enough to have them. There are thousands of cases of people who have kids because they feel they are ready for this responsibility but are really not and it causes kids to have a rough start in life.

Children, adolescent, and teenagers do not have the maturity to make a decision that essentially affects the rest of their life. Furthermore, scientifically the frontal lobe of the brain that influences rational thought is not fully developed until twenty-five years of age. However, look at the information given in the article, families want to reduce premarital sex as if a female can have sex alone, and the burden of taking care of and providing for their female child. This translates to me that no matter the repercussions our daughter will face, she is no longer the responsibility of the family. Another desensitizing way that societies view

I believe being childfree can be good for some women. Some women don’t have the “maternal instincts”. Without maternal instincts, some mother might not be loving to her child. Some women are more focused on their careers and don’t have a lot time to spend with the child. While other women may feel the world is too dangerous for children. Some women sometimes don’t have a choice to be childfree because of medical reasons and these women may start focusing on their self to found being childfree is what they really enjoy. I can see both sides being very beneficial. I, however chose to have children and I enjoy been a mother but I don’t feel it’s for everyone.

"More than 200,000 children have been involved in a child marriage in the last fifteen years," says Chris Baynes, an author at The Independent. When the words "child marriage," are said, I used to think of a third world country. I think of someone that I thought of as "uncivilized" or as "inhumane," but many people, including me, would be shocked to know that child marriage happens right here in our "civilized" United States. On top of the fact that it generally happens here, it is completely legal in twenty-five states! The other twenty-five states have minimum ages but the loopholes that those laws have are astonishing. Many of the laws loopholes, according to Nurith Aizenman, the writer of "The Loopholes That Allow Child Marriage in the

On average, women in the U.S. typically want to have two children (“Unintended Pregnancy in the United States”). In order to accomplish this, a woman will have to spend around three years pregnant, postpartum or attempting to become pregnant. They will also have to spend about three decades trying to avoid an unintended pregnancy, which is more than three-quarters of her reproductive life (“Unintended Pregnancy in the United States”). There are many different reasons that contribute to why most couples and individuals may want to plan the timing of when they have children, while also avoiding unintended pregnancies. Pregnancies can be expensive. Total costs to U.S. taxpayers from unintended pregnancies have been estimated to range from

According to Duxbury, Medhill & Lyons (2005), most childless people’s aspirations are to be independent and free. This is critical to their decision and forms the most common motivation for childlessness. A study by Houseknecht (1987), noted that being free from the responsibility of childcare, and the opportunities it offered, received over 80% of the votes on the key motivation to remaining childless by couples. The most popular perception is that childless couples have a general dislike for children. Although this may be true for several quarters, it is the general discomfort of being around children or the lack of interest in them that is commonly cited than outright dislike (Scott, 2009). In contrast to the popular belief, only a few childless

There are some aspects of this argument that are flawed. In the first place it is subtlety implied that having a child is immoral unless they can provide economic benefit to their parents. One would take issue with that statement as it is indirectly implied that the sole point of someone having a child is so they can exist as for a lack of a better word cash cow. That type of statement can come across to some as insensitive as Rachel’s is simply stating that the only purpose for having children is so they can provide for their parents not so they can be someone to be loved and cared

“Children learn more from what you are than what you teach,” W.E.B DuBois. If this statement is true, then one could say that becoming pregnant and starting a family later in life would be beneficial to the growth of a child. A woman over 35 would have lived more, had more life experience, and in most cases, be a more mature, stable person. However, society and medical books would say differently. As so many remind those creeping up on thirty who are childless about their “ticking biological clock”, we fight as a society to what is the norm and what is the best for our lives.

Women who postpone conceiving are more financially secure. One U.S. study found that a woman ‘s earnings increase 9% for every year she postpones having a child.

At the core of the debate is one unmistakable fact; people really don’t have to get pregnant Out-of-wedlock births really are a matter of choice, a lack of foresight, and sheer irresponsibility. There were 614,000 pregnancies among 15- to 19-year-old women in the United States in 2010, or about 57 pregnancies per 1,000 women in that age group, according to a new study by the Guttmacher Institute. That’s a 51 percent decline from the peak rate in 1990, and a 15 percent decline from the 2008 rate, when there were about 68 pregnancies per 1,000 women in that age group.

The one-child policy is the one-child limitation in the population control policy of the People's Republic of China. The Chinese government refers to it under the official translation of family planning policy. It officially restricts married, urban couples to having only one child, while allowing exemptions for several cases, including rural couples, ethnic minorities, and parents without any siblings themselves. A spokesperson of the Committee on the One-Child Policy has said that approximately 35.9% of China's population is currently subject to the one-child restriction. The Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau are completely exempt from the policy. Also exempt from this law are foreigners living in China.