Analysis Of Consider The Lobster

In the essay “Consider the Lobster”, David Foster Wallace communicates his experience in the Main Lobster Festival as a writer for a food magazine called “Gourmet”. In this essay, he explores the impact the festival had on him as he tries to question the morals of eating lobsters. Wallace initially makes it seem as the festival is a place of fun and celebration as he describes the entertainment: concerts, carnival rides, lobster-themed food, lobster-themed clothes, and lobster-themed toys (50). In spite of that, he changes his attitude as he observes that the festival is actually promoting cruelty to animals and holds a long discussion whether or not lobsters can actually feel pain. Through the use of his language and description, Wallace convinces the audience as he claims to persuade the reader to stop eating lobsters, but he doesn’t explicitly say so at any point in the essay.

Do you know that Maine is famous for lobsters because it harvests the majority of lobsters in the United States? The population reached to 1.336 million people living in the state of Maine. And the total area of Maine is 35,385 square miles, also known as the biggest state with the most land from the original 13 colonies.

​In conducting a rhetorical analysis of the two articles, "Joel Salatin: How to Eat Animals and Respect Them, Too" by Madeline Ostrander and "Humane Meat? No Such Thing" by Sunaura Taylor, both articles stand in stark contrast in terms of the viewpoints of meat that they present. In order to gain a better understanding of these viewpoints, it's important to understand the persuasive techniques that both authors use in the article for the reader. More specifically, the ethos, pathos, and logos that they employ, as well the way in which the evidence and support is presented will further elucidate upon the arguments that appear in both articles.

Any object can be the topic for discussion, as long as it is relevant to the current reality of today’s society. In 2005, David Foster Wallace published, “Consider The Lobster,” in Gourmet magazine. In this piece Wallace provides evidence that lobster is more than just a posh crustacean enjoyed by the rich and famous, but instead an example for an aspect of American society today that is commonly overlooked. Throughout this article, Wallace uses his clever sense of humor, extensive footnotes, and powerful rhetorical questions to relay the idea that ignorance is an essential theme in American society that complicates more facets of our lives, than we care to believe.

How do you consider the lobster? David Foster Wallace wrote the essay Consider the Lobster. After the reading, the essay for the first time the thoughts that went through my head consisted of how the lobsters were treated and what Wallace thought of the lobsters. The lobsters are chosen out of usually a pot or a giant tank and then boiled to death. They are placed into a pot of boiling hot water and the saying that the lobsters are screaming in the pot comes to be true. Some people find it disturbing to listen to the sound while others cover the pot and not let it bother them. Also, from the first reading I thought that Wallace was being somewhat hypocritical because I got the idea that it was acceptable for him to eat and coo ketch lobsters but seeing it done in the setting of a restaurant, in a larger quantity makes it worse. Gathering all this information again had made me rethink the essay and look towards the deeper meaning. Wallace committed suicide in 2008 due to mental illness. So, when we consider the lobster does it mean that to be considerate of it? Another point I came to was about was mental illness and how in 2008 Wallace committed suicide. When lobsters are chosen and boiled to eat, those people are sending them to their 'grave'. So, what does being considerate consist of when discussing a lobster, a dead body and the food we are about to eat?

The purpose of the essay, Consider The Lobster, is to be informative on an annual event, that might grab the readers interest. It tells the reader all about lobsters and the state of Maine’s annual lobster festival. The esssay goes into detail all the way to the history of the festival. It also, gives a brief history about lobsters, including the origination of lobsters. The lobster festival takes place in the states midcoast region, meaning the western side of Penobscot Bay, which is the nerve stem of Maine’s lobster industry.

I was approximately 7 or 8 years old when the smell of gambling and blood was the air, thrilling the expectations of the spectators. The ear piercing sound of a rooster begging for mercy from his opponent. Like savages we cheered on the winner, I found myself in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico. Years later, when I sit down to read, “Consider the Lobster” by David Foster Wallace, the feeling of guilt that ran through my mind made me feel uncomfortable. the Lobster are boiled alive at these festivals and as the author mentioned that, the lobster was moving in agony as he was trying to get out the pot while he was boiling alive. For the people that do not care, it is not about individual conscience but on a moral perspective. I have a simple question to ask them, can you imagine getting into a boiling pot and boiled alive for approximately 35-45 seconds? Because that’s how long it takes the lobster to die in the boiling pot. Animal Cruelty has to be stopped in both cockfights in Puerto Rico and the lobsters being boiled alive in New England or at least force people

In the article “Consider the Lobster”, David Wallace uses rhetorical strategies such as logical and emotional appeal, to persuade his audience of cooking gurus and top-notch chefs that the act of brutally killing an animal is morally wrong. Often times these acts are looked over because of the demand for food and the social aspect that often comes along with it. Wallace forces readers to think about these acts through the article using these rhetorical strategies and small amounts of satire.

The purpose of Consider the Lobster is to bring awareness to people about the excessive use of lobsters. Wallace is not trying to tell people what to do but more so giving suggestions to take all things into consideration. A big issue that the author points out is many people’s refusal to consider lobsters to be only something good to eat. The writing tells us what kind of creations these animals are and gives you a different perspective on the pain that the actual lobster might feel.

The article, Consider the Lobster, was very interesting. It started out kind of bland but I learned a lot about cooking lobsters and the annual Lobster Festival that takes place in Maine. I think that by writing this article the author was not only wanting to advertise the annual Main Lobster Festival, but he also wanted to inform his readers on different ways that lobsters are cooked. He wanted to discuss his opinion on boiling lobsters alive. He believed that it may sound inhumane, but then he provided background information to show why he believes it is not.

Yes, indubitably despite some shared techniques. To further illustrate one needs not look further than Evan Agostini's recent article where he reported that "angry white people were threatening to boycott Red Lobster, as a response to Beyoncé giving a shout-out to the restaurant chain in her new politically charged song "Formation." If this boycott were to materialize could it hold a candle to 1955's Martin Luther King Jr. Montgomery bus boycott?

Cutting meat out of a diet entirely can be detrimental to the health of many people, because meat has important nutrients that are necessary to lead a healthy life. One big contributor that is regularly mentioned when discussing this topic is protein. A lot of people say that there are sources of protein other than meat, but meat is a great source of complete protein, containing all the amino acids our bodies need, including the ones our bodies can’t produce. People who don’t eat meat are especially vulnerable to neurotransmitter imbalances. “Neurotransmitters are chemical

Part 1 of this list brought us along a strange path of weird movies but we are just getting started. If the weird is too much for you, then turn back now. If not, stay tuned because we're going deeper.

Meat,” Charles Eisenstein opens his article with the note that many vegetarians are not truly motivated by nutrition alone. There are some, who are vegetarians, as a result of cultural or religious reasons, and mentions Animism, which is the belief that animals have a soul and therefore it is wrong to kill them. Yet, Eisenstein notes, the overwhelming majority follow this type of diet because they feel moral outrage at the manner and conditions in which some animals are kept. Specifically, he discusses the ways that the meat industry rear cattle for meat, and details the poor conditions of filth, crowding, and confinement. However, as Eisenstein argues this moral outrage should rather be directed at the practices of the meat industry as opposed to the practice of killing animals for food. Moreover, he points out that the “meat industry seeks to maximize production” but “actually it seeks to maximize profit, which means maximizing not “production” but “productivity”” (Eisenstein 2). Another argument he addresses is despite a favorable view of vegetarianism within the nutritional field, some researchers do dispute some of the health claims.

Vegetarianism has important philosophical grounds related to murdering animals and the fact that all life on earth should be respected and protected (“Nutrition Ecology” par 1). Unlike extreme ideas about animal rights that go as far as forbid people to ride mules for their benefit, advocates of vegetarianism proceed from one simple principle - that killing is wrong and animals have the same right to live. In theory, such a position means that a person is striving to live in harmony with the outer world, a feature that in itself can promote healthier lifestyle. However, there more matter-of-fact arguments in favor of vegetarianism, and these arguments hinge on the nutritional benefits of a veggie diet.