Analysis Of Gorman Beauchamp 's Article, Technology

People in the world today depend on technology to help them succeed through life. However, the rate of its use among young kids and teen customers is increasing at a rapid pace. The reason being is that they would rather text a class friend and use social media rather than meeting up with them. In Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, the scenario is similar to the world today, because nobody communicates or connects with people personally, leaving them isolated and alone. Also, in the article called “Tasking Multitasking To Task”, by Mark Harris, he explains that technology is affecting the human mind to lack interest in social skills and hobbies. Harris’ claim that technology is corrupting our lives is correct because many people have lost their attention span for anything beyond a simple phrase.

Though digital technologies allow us to accomplish many things, we also have lost the ability to give each other our full attention. We prefer texting rather than fully engage in a conversation. An example in the book is Aubrey. Aubrey believes that texting allows her to stay in contact with more people at once because she can bounce from conversation to conversation. We as human beings, both children and adults, have identical patterns of compulsive disorders. We are obsessed with our devices. We never leave the house without our cell phones and what’s worse, we text or call people who are in the same house as us. While we are with our family and friends, we are also living in another world, where everyone accepts us for who we are through our cellular devices. Using our mobile devices, we can transport ourselves to different realities that we wish to have. These are online games that allow us to create our own avatar and live the life that we want to live. In that world, no one will be able to judge us for how we are. We are embracing ourselves through simulated lives with avatars and simulated relationships through virtual connections. Digital technologies have become the center of our social, economic, and professional

Many people are not mindful of how technology is disconnecting us from one another. When people pull out smartphones during a conversation or social gathering they will cause others to feel disconnected. These phones allow people to withdraw from what is happing now and move another situation reducing the quality of the conversation that is within our reach. In the essay "Stop Googling. Let's Talk" by Sherry Turkle; she believes that we are becoming a culture of short chats versus growing our culture of thinkers that are open to sharing in constructive and meaningful conversations with one another.

Technology is becoming detrimental to our abilities to communicate, and empathize with each other. In these days Individuals rarely have a reason to communicate with one another face to face, because they usually communicate over texts or emails. This is a problem because the younger generations lack the empathy that you can only gain through conversation with others. A lack of empathy will eventually erode a person’s feelings of connection with society and they will become a self-made outcast, disconnected from society because people are too difficult to empathize with. This Paper will attempt to counteract the detrimental effects of technology on society.

Technology distracts most of the society’s feelings and actions. For example, Mildred is “literally incapable of thought and remembering” because she “immerses herself in the media provided for her to consume” (Telgen 150). Guy and Mildred’s relationship isn’t good because Mildred’s “family” is television and she almost always has conversations with her television “family.” While Clarisse and Guy are having a thorough conversation, Clarisse states: “People don’t talk about anything” (Bradbury 28). Communication is hardly present within their society, and if present, conversations are meaningless because they won’t remember anything or

In the modern day, we use technology to every benefit we can and I am not ashamed of that; my opinion on the use of technology (specifically computers) is that in quantities of moderation, technology can exponentially expand the growth of our civilization. For my second cultural object, I chose my home computer because I can spend upwards of hours upon it each day, primarily doing work or visiting recreational, social websites and games. The renowned scientist Carl Sagan once said, “We’ve arranged a civilization in which most crucial elements profoundly depend on science and technology.” This quotation blatantly applies to modern day society, where it is nearly impossible to communicate with people without an email or cell phone. The laptop is also an immense part of my culture regarding schoolwork, where I need the laptop to access the websites teachers use. With so many hours per day enveloped the laptop, it has grown to be a large part of my daily routine and culture overall.

In our culture today we see the progression of how technology has affected our social makeup. In “Is Google Making us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, the writer makes clear that our current use of technology has diminished our ability to think critically. While one could agree with Carr’s point, there is also an issue that has a greater level of concern. Our ability to think critically about the information we gather is only a resultant consequence of the population’s new-found focus on technology rather than relating intentionally. Why is it that our current social constructs are made up almost entirely of technology? What happened to the time when humans interacted outside of their obsession to seek comfort from what lacks any empathy (their phones), rather than real humans?

Cell phones are commonly the first and last thing that the people in our society look at before they go to sleep. All over the place you can spot children who "are all hanging out, but instead of looking at each other, they are staring at their phones." (Newsela, From phone-to-phone). In this day and age, people are losing the ability to communicate, and instead of doing so they text each other on their phones. No matter where in the world, kids spend more time "corresponding with their friends through text messaging rather than talking to them in person." (Newsela, From phone-to-phone). These phones are taking away the ability to speak to one another. Not only that, but they are taking away part of what it means to be human. Ray Bradbury sends this message as well in his novel, Fahrenheit 451. One of the characters in this book, known as Clarisse, talks about how she enjoys communication and how she thinks that "being with people is nice. But I don’t think it’s social to get a bunch of people together and then not let them talk, do you?" (Bradbury 27). Bradbury shows that if humans do not talk to each other, even if they are together, they all not being social. Bradbury also expresses the fact that if people do not interact, they will not be able to remember one another. Montag can't even remember his own wife. He tries and tries but can only come up with "my wife, my wife. Poor Millie, poor, poor

There are three main reasons why technology is damaging our society; it’s affecting our way of communicating with each other, reducing our self-reliance, and, last but not least, it’s dominating our society. The first reason, that it’s affecting our way of communicating with each other, is very prevalent in Fahrenheit 451 and our current society. In our current society, we use a many types of technology to communicate with each other. This ranges from iPads to iPhones to household telephones, etc.. This allows us to talk to each other without having to be close to each other, which presents the problem of diminishing the need for engagement with others. In Fahrenheit 451, a character by the name of Faber, invents a small radio that is to be inserted into the ear of Montag, which allows them to communicate with each other whenever they need to without having to have a face-to-face conversation. This also diminishes the need for engagement with others. Another situation is also faced in this book when firemen burn houses instead of preventing houses from burning. This occurs when the firemen find books of any kind in someone’s house because of the book ban in this novel. Not letting people read also diminishes the need for engagement with books, which links on to the bigger dilemma of

Members of this society have lost the ability to have true, meaningful relationships with people because they have abandoned everything for technology. Those obsessed with technology are unable to have and keep relationships with other members of their society. Mildred is a key example of this. She values her technology more than her own husband. "She shoved the valise in the waiting beetle, climbed in, and sat mumbling , 'Poor family, poor family, oh everything gone, everything, everything gone now. . . . '" (Bradbury 108). MIldred would rather save herself than stay with the man who she supposedly loves when he needs help. She thinks about technology and herself, not Montag or any other human being. “He squinted at the wall. ‘The favourite subject, Myself.’ ‘I understand that one,’ said Mildred” (Bradbury 68). Technology is causing people to forget others and only think of themselves and technology. They

This combination causes the people to not “...talk about anything...they all say the same things and nobody says anything different from anyone else’ ” (Bradbury 28). As technology plays a major role in their life, socializing and interacting with others is no longer valued and forgotten—causing the people to become recluded. Similarly, this is reflected in our society as technology is advancing, and people are becoming infatuated with their devices. Often times, “the kids are all hanging out, but instead of looking at each other, they are staring at their phones” (Los Angeles Times). With technology being at reach, and the current popularity of online social media, people are finding shortcuts and alternative ways to interact with others virtually instead of physical interaction. Although this idea seems innovative, it damages our society’s social structure as people are not being exposed to social skills—thus, creating a socially corrupted community. Not only is technology impacting human interaction, but the people’s mentality as well. Mildred, from Fahrenheit 451, believes that “ ‘books aren 't real people. You read and I look around, but there isn 't anybody...My ‘family’, is people. They tell me things; I laugh, they laugh’ ” (Bradbury 69). Mildred is infamous for being obsessed with her parlor walls—televisions integrated walls—and often refers to her ‘parlor family’ as her biological family.

By a “technological understanding” of ordinary and extraordinary care, Brannigan is referring to the shift from a more phenomenological definition to one founded on the technology available to treat the symptoms regardless to the state of the patient. Thus, an actual derivation of the best path for an individual patient is not considered because a specific technology already exists to fix the generalized health concern. Specifically, a technological understanding focuses on which treatment is the simplest, most standard, natural, and inexpensive. This is an issue because it eliminates the circumstances of the patient from the equation and relies solely on the technology to be utilized and has no moral relevancy. In comparison, the original

Take a minute and allow me to paint a picture of the past for you. Let’s go back to just 1994 when cell phones were almost obsolete. The wealthy and rich had access to bag phones and Motorola commercial phones of which costed an arm and a leg per minute. If one wanted an update on a family member or friend, you could not simply just shoot a text or take a peek at Facebook; one actually had to pick up a land line or travel for face to face interaction. Not having many technological luxuries promoted a simpler lifestyle, one with better social interaction and communication skills. Now, fast-forward to the technology driven society. The society we live in today lacks the face to face communication skills, struggles with identity fluidity, and holds an extreme compulsion to be connected to technology every hour of the day.

There is a plethora of topics that can be associated with technology now including social interactions, educational benefits, and entertainments. For example, social media has developed to be a highly impactful and influential technical advance; it has permeated through various equipments such as phones, computers, digital video players, and even automobiles, which explains how news and trends catch on tremendously fast all over the world. Through sharable websites, for instance YouTube, people can openly share their lifestyle and beliefs thus this intermingle of opinions can easily lead to conformation. The trend today is to openly be a nonconformist. However, if we put people from all over the world together in a room, it would impossible to deny their similarities to one another whether it concerns with physical appearance, or even the mindset to be against conformity as the valued poet, Ralph Waldo Emerson, pushed forth in the 19th century. Internally, everyone recognizes common ground within one another, and that is through technology. Individuals who despise innovative technology remain to find the spontaneous combustion of 3D pens, 3D printers, and controlling robots with your mind, astounding because it remains to make people flabberghasted to hear of these astonishing creations. Who would have ever thought that you can draw in mid-air, watch something that was nothing become real and tangible, and bewilder others of how powerful their mind can be to control an object with no physical interaction? Suddenly the movies Back to the Future or The Fifth Element do not seem to completely be futuristic and fiction. We are slowly becoming more accepting to foreign imaginations such as holograms and teleportation that are gradually coming into our reality seeing that technology is already performing unimaginable

Over this past decade or so, people all around the globe have been granted with greater advancements in technology. From cellphones we can talk to, to 3-Dimensional televisions, we are able to pretty much do anything thanks to these high-tech products. But, should we really be grateful for these easy-to-use devices, or are they taking over the lives of millions? In the articles written by Michael Malone and Daniel Burrus, we receive an inside look on whether todays modern, wired, Web world is, or is not, benefitting society. Although both authors held pretty neutral views on the subject itself, Malone’s support towards the negative effect of technology definitely lures readers into