Analysis Of Inherit The Wind

1143 Words5 Pages
Throughout the twentieth century, numerous dramas that were written in the United States presented ideas and situations that had the purpose of changing a reader’s attitude towards a specific subject. This is the case of the play “Inherit the Wind”, a piece written by the playwrights Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. Throughout the years, many literary scholars have argued whether or not “freedom of thought” has stood as a predominant theme in the play. While this issue may bring about countless debates, my respect towards others’ viewpoints has allowed me to pick a side and to defend it with textual evidence from the play itself. From my perspective, the main theme in Inherit the Wind is freedom of thought.
Throughout the drama, it is simple to notice that knowledge is vehemently censored. First of all, the right to think differently is challenged by Matthew Harrison Brady. For example, when Brady states that he refuses to “allow these agnostic scientists to employ this courtroom as a sounding board” (2.2.82), he establishes the idea that he is not willing to accept the testimony of individuals that have different viewpoints from his own, an action that clearly challenges the right of others to have distinct ideas, and that also confronts their ability to present concepts and theories that might help the citizens of Hillsboro to think independently without conforming with the most popular opinion on the subject of evolution. Secondly, the control over the education system

More about Analysis Of Inherit The Wind

Open Document