preview

Analysis Of John Harris Letter To A Christian Nation

Decent Essays

Harris’s writing style in “Letter to a Christian Nation” is arrogant, generalized, brash, and downright rude at certain points. It is extremely clear what he is trying to get the reader to do; pick a side (hopefully his) early on and then agree with him for the remainder of the book. This strategy does not fair well when one is contemplating the heaviness of the topic at hand. Spirituality (or lack thereof) is not simply a yes or no answer on all accounts, and it is here that Harris stumbles. He is a very biased writer and leaves out facts and details in almost all of his arguments, causing him to lose his credibility. It could easily be said that Harris’s writing style in his arguments is so narrow minded and one-sided that it is the ultimate detriment to the many points he is …show more content…

He says, “You [the reader] believe that the Bible is the most profound book ever written and that its contents have stood the test of time so well that it must have been divinely inspired. All of these beliefs are false” (Harris). By making this statement Harris is already setting the reader up to take the verses out of context without a second thought. After this comment Harris then does just that; takes old testament verses out of context to prove that the Bible is not a holy text to be revered, but a barbaric manuscript that people still take literally and strictly adhere to in every sense of the word. His blatant disregard to the cultures and social norms of the time when the old testament was written only furthers the argument that his points are not backed by intellectual gathering of thought, but simply a result of his indignation against organized religion. Harris’s strategy of presenting information as if it is extensively researched, factual material is one of the biggest fallacies of this

Get Access