Analysis Of John Osborne's Anger

Anger is a normal emotion with a wide range of intensity, from mild irritation and frustration to rage. It is a reaction to a perceived threat to us, or some part of our identity. Anger motivates powerful and aggressive feelings and behaviors, which allow us to fight and defend ourselves when we are attacked. Anger is a warning bell that tells us that something is wrong. Anger is a vitally important evolutionary gift and without it we are perpetual victims. Anger can be a good thing, it allows expressing negative feelings. Anger protects humans from sitting and boiling inside body and mind. It stops the rise of many physical illnesses and mental distress. Expressing the feeling of Anger indicates human’s surviving and existence. This feeling

The play is like a mirror of the cultural struggle, pressure and the conflict between classes that spread in nation after the terrors of World War II. For that purpose, the play concentrates

During our lifetime every one of us feels anger and aggression occasionally, some more than others, maybe as a child in the play ground or later as an adult when somebody cuts you up when you are driving along. But what causes anger and aggression and why do we all suffer from it? Well there are lots of different theories to what causes aggression and where aggressive behaviour comes from. So throughout this essay I will examine the different concepts and theories from different psychologist and develop and show an understanding of Aggression

The play The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde and the novella The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson showcase the Victorian era. With memorable characters like Aunt Augusta, accustomed to tea time and addicted to her cucumber sandwiches, and the loveable Dr. Jekyll, driven by his own devilish work, one is almost able to hear the trotting of horses with carriages on cobblestone streets. While the thought of high society and misty mornings is appealing, both works of literature are also used to convey the ludicrousness of Victorian society. Whether it is Algernon or Jack bunburying in the country or Dr. Jekyll’s transformation into the detestable Mr. Hyde, each one has found a need to create a separate entity from themselves due to societal pressures. Wilde’s lighthearted mockery of the things central to society, such as class struggle and marriage, and his deliberate focus on things less meaningful, like cucumber sandwiches, adds a much more serious tone to his play in modern society than Stevenson, who uses graphic images and internal struggle to convey his thoughts on society and encourage reader introspection.

In the sardonic play,” The Importance of being Earnest”, the author, Oscar Wilde, criticizes the Victorian era. Wilde touches on key subjects like social status, marriage, and utilizes various symbolisms, in a comedic way to mock the Victorian era’s detrimental culture. Wilde uses contrasting characters to convey a symbolism of the Victorian era in a satirical way. In doing this, he uses different characters to prove his point in mocking Victorian culture. These characters are used represent all that is worth criticizing in Victorian society.

Man is the slave of his emotions. These emotions may be positive or negative . Anger is one of these emotions. According to an online article titled How to recognize and deal with anger "Anger is a negative feeling state that is typically associated with hostile thoughts, physiological arousal and maladaptive behaviors to hostile thought ". Anger results from restriction imposed against man's wishes. Man's life can be changed completely by anger; when anger takes control of anyone, he becomes villain, transgressive and irrational. Anger cotains three elements : physical reaction, the cognitive experience of anger and the behavior or the way man shows his anger. Anger is a double aged weapon ; it can motivate the person to find solutions

Wilde has beautifully portrayed the characters of the play and they remain alive in each act of this drama. However, their sense of purpose and values remain foggy and highly confusing till the end of the play. When we read this play, we see that the dramatist portrays each character to depict the hypocrisy of the contemporary Victorian society. Wilde deals with the inconsistency of nature of men here. None of the male characters are serious in life or earnest in nature. There is lack of moral values in each character. The characters contradict themselves most of the time. Jack, the protagonist of the play, throws out all Victorian values even though he represents the model Victorian man and aristocratic English people. Through his characterization and portrayal of inconsistent characters, Wilde satirizes upon the English society and the hypocrisy prevalent in the Victorian era.

One of the main messages in the play is Wilde's proposal to his Victorian contemporaries on the need to treat inconsequential issues with great respect and pay less focus to what is regarded as serious by the society. The suggestion or philosophy was one of the main messages expressed by Wilde in the entire play. Through emphasizing on this philosophy, Wilde's play is clearly a comic critique of the values of the Victorian society, especially on what was treated with great respect in the society.

It was in the middle of the 1950s when John Osborne brought the movement of the called Angry Young Men to the stage personified by Jimmy Porter, the main character of Look Back in Anger. This Kitchen Sink Drama shows a picture of working people’s life as well as the provocative, rebellious, dissatisfied and angry attitude of the main character. Osborne portraits Jimmy as a working class young man full of anger and human emotion who bears neither slothfulness nor social inequality. Anger is the dominant emotion in the play, but how and why is it expressed by Jimmy? From the fragment provided, there are three important points through which Jimmy Porter shows his deep anger and which lead him to be considered a representation of the Angry Young

There has been but one emotion enslaving humans under it’s curse since the dawn of time; anger. Anger is accountable for revolutions, shedding of blood, wars and any upheaval which wreaks havoc, destruction and chaos anywhere and to anyone. Anger can be defined as “an emotional state that consists of feelings of irritation, annoyance, fury or rage and heightened activation or arousal of the auto-nomic nervous system” (Spielberger, et al. 16). Pain usually accompanies anger and angry human beings tend to set their minds on harming others.

The absurd theatre is another movement that emerged as a reaction against the old methods of culture and literature. In fact, the idea of the absurd is not new but it roots in the history of human beings. Absurdity in life is primordial and not the invention of the theatre. With the beginning of life, man is struggling against it to find a solution. The efforts are aimed at a meaningful life and human being’s interrelationship with the universe. It is an eternal struggle between the two. Thus, the absurdity is not the product of any one factor but it generates through the inevitable dependency. Albert Camus, in his famous essay The Myth of Sisyphus, highlights that:

Anger is generally the result of frustration and feelings of inadequacy when the attainment of a goal is blocked (6). It can be triggered by both external and internal events, even events that happened a long time ago or to unrelated people. A person could be angry at specific targets, like a coworker or neighbor, or at an overall event, such as a delayed flight. Anger can even result from an individual's brooding or anxiety over personal problems (1). Intense anger can even be caused by dreams, causing the person who experienced this brain produced 'movie' to wake up seething over an imaginary event.

In John Drinkwater’s “Wilde's `The Importance of Being Earnest'”, Drinkwater goes in depth on the intensity of his play. Drinkwater strongly believes that this is “the only one of Wilde's works that really has its roots in passion” (Drinkwater 1). He has studied many Oscar Wilde plays and, under his eyes, sees

The theatre of the absurd is a term formulated by Martin Esslin during the 1950s and 1960s. Essentially, it is derived from Albert Camus, the French author, in his Myth of Sisyphus. The origins of the absurd theatre are in the hard experiments in the art during the 1920s and 1930s. The absurd drama is not determined to solve any problem on the modern stage. Absurd drama excludes language as a resource for communication. Language has become meaningless exchanges. In fact, it fails to reflect the importance of human experience; it is restricted to the surface meaning and never penetrates beyond its depth. The language which is used in absurd drama is specifically conventionalized speech, clichés and slogans that have become very common to many writers.

Look Back in Anger as an extraordinary play / John Osborne as a dramatist / Social issues in Look Back in Anger / Look Back in Anger as a mouthpiece of John Osborne