Analysis Of Julius Caesar 's ' The Tale Without Felling A Sense Of Reverence For The Man '

Julius Caesar, a Roman general, dictator, and leader, is considered to be one of history 's most influential and powerful rulers to this day, in which his rise to power, conquest of Europe, and controversial downfall all remain to be told during modern days. The play Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, portrays the events leading up to Julius Caesar’s assassination, and how those who conspired against him banded together and plotted Caesar’s demise. Many of those conspirators assassinated Caesar due to his quick rise to absolute power, his “acts” of disrespect against the senate such as his failing to stand to receive the title of becoming a “god,” and pure jealousy and anger towards Caesar’s success and rule over the Roman empire. Caesar, an ambitious man, was able to conquer many lands and peoples for Rome through successful military campaigns in which he became one Rome’s best generals due to the amount of successful battles he had won and the amount of blood he had shed for Rome’s expansion. However, Caesar’s trait of ambitiousness would prove to be a double edged sword.

Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.

This investigation evaluates the question, to what extent did Julius Caesar 's assassination affect Rome, politically and socially. Gaius Julius Caesar, famously known for his brilliant military strategies and shrewd political expertise, helped transform the Roman Republic into one of the greatest civilization in the western world. During his reign, Julius Ceasar expanded Rome’s geographical territory across Ancient Europe immensely, conquering areas of present-day France and Britain. The investigation will primarily focus on the political opportunities created by Caesar 's death, as well as the public reaction, from the immediate ramifications to its long-term effect on the Roman government. Effects in foreign and other civilizations not directly involved with Roman affairs or within Rome will not included in the investigation. Sources for the investigation will include The Emperors of Rome by David Potter and the Ancient History Encyclopedia .

There have been many rulers in history who have been betrayed by those they trust, but The Tragedy of Julius Caesar (William Shakespeare,1959) still holds a special place in Western literature as one of the most enigmatic human beings to ever exist. Powerful men like Julius Caesar shaped the life and times of the late Roman Republic, just before Rome would officially become the Roman Empire on the crowning of Augustus as the first Roman emperor. Julius Caesar was a powerful general who expanded Rome's power and who was beloved by the people for his generous charity after his successful conquests. Despite knowing the story of Julius Caesar to some extent, most 16th/17th century English would not have ever visited Rome, nor would know what the Roman Republic was like, which presented a unique opportunity to William Shakespeare to create a play unlike any other he had created before. (Shakespeare Julius Caesar, 1599) Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is a reimagining of Rome from a Elizabethan point of view, and despite some inaccuracies, the play depicts an enlightening view on Roman life, and the life of the Roman general, Julius Caesar.

Julius Caesar was a very influential figure in Roman history. Many features of the Roman Empire came from his reign as dictator. But what, specifically, were some of those great achievements? In this research paper, I will explain Julius Caesar’s youth, the Roman Republic before Caesar came to power, the Roman government before Caesar became dictator-for-life, the effects of Julius Caesar, the reasons for his assassination, and what affects there were when the public learned about his assassination.

“Veni, vidi, vici.” These three words spoken by Julius Caesar perfectly sum up the life and legacy of this great man, (Mathisen 382). Although Caesar was not an emperor of Rome, he played a large role in creating the Roman Empire. Alive during the Age of the Generals (88-60 BCE), he ascended the political hierarchy to become the most powerful man in Rome, (Mathisen 372). Caesar was beloved by the people or Rome as well as the army, who aided him in taking over control of the Republic. However, not everyone in Rome was a fan of Caesar, including some Senators and groups which he conquered during his various expeditions.

Due to the writing and works of William Shakespeare, the death of Julius Caesar became the most famous assassination in history. The death of Julius Caesar is placed in full context of Rome’s civil wars by eminent historian Barry Strauss. Moreover, the assassination itself was a complexly layered plan that was a direct result of Caesar’s power and leadership choices leading up to the fateful day. These key events leading up to the Ides of March—and the aftermath that followed—are important to understanding the immense effect Caesar 's death had on Rome, and on its subsequent demise. In the height of Rome, Caesar formed a political alliance with Pompey that dominated Roman politics. Furthermore, Caesar’s victories in the Gallic War and

The Civil War, consisting in large part of Caesar’s own account of the conflict between himself and Pompey, explores the origins of the war, the manner in which it was carried out, and most importantly the role of pivotal figures on both sides of the struggle. Prior to his records ending and supplementation by military officers, Caesar makes a case for his involvement in and perhaps triggering of the war, one which would transform the social and political landscape of the Roman empire as battles and campaigns were waged from Spain to Italy, Africa to Asia Minor. Caesar walks a fine line between historian, strategist and orator as he attempts to record historical events, martial decisions, and persuade an audience respectively. Despite his efforts to remain impartial, as evidenced by his admission that “the Pompeians were winning” at Dyrrachium, Caesar consistently presents himself as a charismatic and skilled general and leader, jeopardizing the integrity of the text as objective material and allowing it to be a propagandist account of sorts. Ultimately, Caesar uses anecdotal evidence, the presentation of his personal thoughts, and juxtaposition with his opposition to paint his side of the war in a positive and just light.

The second secondary source, reveals the personal life, conquests, fails, and facts of Julius Caesar, the eventual dictator of the Roman Republic. The origin of this text is San Diego, California, by Don Nardo in 1999. The purpose of this text is to educate the reader and the audience about Julius Caesar, the ruthless and cunning leader that shaped the Roman Republic forever. The value of the source is that reveals many unknown pieces of information about Julius Caesar and really highlights his influence on the transition of government. Without Julius Caesar, there may have never been such internal conflict in the republic. The Senate wouldn’t have fled to the rest of Italy, politicians like Pompey never would have been defeated, and there would have been time before a leader declared themselves as a dictator. The book is very useful because it presents unbiased and clear information about Julius

In this compelling biography detailing the history of Julius Caesar and the greatest figure in history through my eyes it depicted they ways he has helped mold Rome even after his death two thousand years ago. Julius Caesar by Philip Freeman is a very well written book. This biography, however, comes neither to praise Caesar overmuch nor to bury him among the tyrants of history (3). I must say that I am not an avid book reader but from what I already knew about Julius Caesar I figured this would broaden my interest. Julius Caesar was an author, politician, and a general that was a big part of the great Holy Roman Empire. Philip Freeman did a great job in portraying Julius Caesar as a hero and a villain. It almost seems that all people that have done great things in their respective fields get the

Despite the fears of his contemporaries of him overturning the Roman Republic into an Empire, Caesar proves his nobility as a victor for the people. Ambitious and on the path of ushering Rome into a new Golden Age, Julius Caesar wins the favor of the Senate. In turn they wish to crown him King of the Senate. It is important to note that this was not Caesar’s initiative, but that of the Senate. Caesar acting as an ordinary man would do is inclined to take the opportunity that is given to him.

Having superior skills as an orator he showcased them numerous times as a politician at an early age. Caesar was also exceptionally well at leading an army and many of his opponents were well aware of this. This book takes place from the beginning of Caesar’s life living in the

Julius Caesar is perhaps the most well known in the history of Roman Emperors, yet there is no denying that his reign was filled with controversy, no reason more so than his devious rise to power and his mischievous ways of suppressing the senate. There is no doubt that in ruling as a Dictator; Caesar lost the support of the Roman people, who had fought for freedom against an Etruscan King, a role in which Caesar was playing. His death in 44BC coincided with what many believe to be the year in which the Republic completely its eventual ‘fall’ that it had been plummeting to since 133BC, and it is only by looking at the differences in the end of his reign to that of Augustus’ in 27BC that

Julius Caesar was undoubtedly a man who changed history. His life and its story have inspired generations of awe and scrupulous study. Many would argue he is the most influential man in recorded history. However, can the great Caesar truly be declared a ‘event-making man’, according to the criteria of the Great Man Theory? Did he truly influence the course of history through his own extraordinary acts of will and leadership? Or was he simply a fortunate man who appeared in the right place at the right time, being only the pawn of a greater scheme? By following and exploring the political ideals and abilities of Caesar, as well as his military ability and prowess, this essay hopes to clearly

     'I came, I saw, I conquered.' These are the words of the man who changed the history of the world. This paper will show how no other man in the history of the world represented military and political power better than Julius Caesar. He became a legend for his military exploits and great leadership ability.