Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail By Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Peacefully resisting laws does have some negative consequences, like more people in jails that are already full. Yet the benefits of peaceful resistance outweighs any negative outcome. If a group or person believes in a cause so much, that they risk themselves being incarcerated or charged with an offense, then that cause needs to be looked at more closely. In his letter from Birmingham Jail, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. said "I am in Birmingham because injustice is here." He believed that it was his duty to take action against the unequal treatment African Americans were facing. His resistance to Jim Crow laws, along with other moral reformers like him, caused a change to be made in a progressive way. Racism is still a relevant problem in American society, yes. But compared to the 1960's, I would say that we are moving in a progressive way due to peaceful resistance for what is right.

40th President Ronald Regan once said that ‘peace is not absence of conflict, it is the ability to handle conflict by peaceful means’, --Dr. King certainly proves this to be factual! In Dr. Martin Luther King Junior's "Letter From Birmingham Jail", Dr. King's makes use of logical arguments directed towards the whites, clergymen, and the general public in order to educate the reader about the strategy of nonviolent resistance to racism—and how they are not causing any troubles by nonviolently protesting for racial justice and equality for African Americans. By doing so, Dr. King successfully persuades the reader to understand that what he is doing by nonviolently protesting is justifiable, and that the tension created by these nonviolent forms

Letters to Birmingham Jail is written by Martin Luther King Jr as a response to eight clergymen who criticize his public protests. They argue that his actions are counter-productive to his movement and pose a potential threat to law and order. This letter expresses King’s feelings towards injustice that has occurred and also explains the unjust events happening in both Birmingham and the rest of America. King defends his legitimacy of breaking the law through nonviolent protests in an act against segregation and racism and insists that these protests were necessary for progression. He also alludes to many notable thinkers such as Jesus and Socrates to aid in the reasonings of his actions. King states that these demonstrations were bound to

People over the year have died, been in imprisoned and fought all in the name for freedom .One that show people be imprisoned is in a story call “ Letter from Birmingham Jail” the show the cost of freedom.Another one is an article called How many Americans have died in U.S. War that show the cost that people are will to take to protest freedom.But some people believed it do not cost anything to have.

Nonviolent movements are widespread across America, but very little are effective enough to create monumental change or to have a lasting impact. In their article "Waging Nonviolence: What makes nonviolent movements explode", Mark and Paul Engler explore what makes nonviolent protests powerful enough to force change. Written in December 2014, the article uses modern and historic examples of protest movements, with the main focus on the Occupy Wall Street movement, to create the context as to what each of the methods discussed has accomplished. Using the main example of Occupy Wall Street, the article showcases two major points, disruption and sacrifice, that nonviolent protest movements utilize in order to have the greatest effect, as well as how those two points work together to create lasting impacts. Disruption relies on interrupting everyday life and preventing business from occurring, while sacrifice focuses on what people are willing to risk and give up in order to see the change they wish for. In their article, the Engler’s propose that while these two methods of protest can be effective, protests rarely become large enough to actually create any change, even if they are combined, simply because the major businesses, corporations, and organizations that are being protested hold incredible amounts of political power and therefore are able to very easily shut down protests with police forces. This argument, that protests are inevitably going to fail, is very realistic

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr was put in jail for 11 days because he was forbidden to hold protests in Birmingham. During his time in jail, King had time to think about what was going on with all the people and the critics and write a letter. In this letter he spoke about his thoughts and his perception of what was happening and gave people a better interpretation of what he perceived and was understanding.

In today's society, the foundation of civil uprisings have been constructed on the principles of both Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.. Even though we are in the 21st century and have overcome numerous events, today we are still fighting the obstacles that both these men had fought during their lifetime. Unfortunately, equality for everyone is still not a concept that has been reached in America, but due to innumerous protests many great outcomes have risen. Both Gandhi and King fabricated a method of non-violent protesting that only benefits the protestors because they give authority no reason to intervene. If authority was interfere against the protest, then the cause would rise in popularity and aggrandize. Although this type of

Throughout history, a common factor between every significant event was the fight for civil rights. Fighting for these rights was generally the cause for a war. However, another form of supporting beliefs for these rights included protesting. The first amendment of the constitution gives you the freedom to express yourself, and also to organize protests. These civil rights protests happen today as well as in the past (“Bill”, 3). These protests include the March on Selma, and The Women's March on Washington that took place in 2016 (Goldberg, 7). Civil Rights protests continue in America because people want racial and gender equality, and they should continue because they are effective.

Civil disobedience, nonviolently breaking a law and accepting its consequences, positively impacts a free society. This truth can be seen clearly through the American movement for racial equality, because the cause was undeniably just. By accelerating legislative change, leveraging social tension, and increasing civic engagement, the ongoing fight for racial equality demonstrates that civil disobedience is a force for good.

Just as with Gandhi or Rosa Parks, many view the protestors, standing non-violently for themselves, as criminals, hurting industry, and causing a disturbance for everyday Americans. When business in an already harmful industry becomes more important than sacred sites and potentially human lives, civil disobedience is necessary to spark change.

Dr. Martin Luther King Junior in his piece, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” shows that good writers go beyond. King had to convince a group of white town leaders that what they fundamentally believed and stood for was immoral. Throughout the letter, King evokes his passion through rhetoric, tone, and real-life experiences. This passion was fueled by what King witnessed in Birmingham and other communities, as a result of racist leaders. His resulting style and structure of writing showed that he was invested in instigating change. Mainly, the late doctor’s letter pushes, without crossing boundaries, fundamental social change. King knew that his opinion was not popular, thus he had to know his audience well. By reading about the way in which Martin Luther King Junior wrote with passion, especially his use of imagery, we can learn to be more effective writers.

A movement, a spark, a flicker of a flame that sets a dignified course into motion. A chant, a cry, a yell for the greater good--a time when “the cup of endurance runs over, and men are no longer willing to be plunged into the abyss of despair” (King, 1963), a time when “an unjust law is no law at all” (St. Augustine), a time when “constructive, nonviolent tension is necessary for growth” (King, 1963)--It is at these times, that civil disobedience is paramount. Peaceful resistance to laws, in these clouded times of injustice, is imperative to positively impacting free society.

Civil disobedience is America’s way of growing. Without historical examples, such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks, the United States would be stuck in antebellum ways of thought. The caveat of these national heroes was that they were peaceful. They did nothing to cause harm or damage. That made a point to their followers as well as their antagonists. In modern times, there are those that follow the rules of peaceful protesting (like the Women’s March on January 21, 2017). On the other hand, you have those who hide behind the term “civil disobedience” to cause destruction and chaos (like the UC Berkeley riots on February 1, 2017). Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts society, but violent resistance masquerading as civil disobedience is tearing our country, once united, to shreds.

Civil disobedience is a timeless practice that has been carried on from generation to generation, from Socrates' refusal to execute Leon of Salamis to today's Syrian rebels' fight for freedom. In many cases of injustice, the public will rise up to reclaim their human rights, and ever so often these fights are nonviolent in nature and educational to all the people who engage in it. However, even in acts of nonviolent demonstrations, both the demonstrator and the demonstrated can be hurt. So the question arises: does peaceful disobedience positively impact a free society? Or does such disobedience only contribute to the tension already apparent? The answer to this question, simply put, is that civil disobedience can positively impact a free society in more ways than one. Peaceful civil disobedience is one of the most important aspects that exemplifies a truly free society, for the ability of a group to protest against injustice is true human freedom. Peaceful demonstrations can also encourage better and stronger livelihood among people who are oppressed, since these actions can and will open the eyes of oppressors, and as a result such

It goes without saying that there have been many problems which have plagued societies since the dawn of time. Many nations try to settle social issues with wars or unjust laws that devastate thousands. However, civil disobedience is a much more effective way to get people’s points across. Civil disobedience peacefully protests unjust laws and principles while accepting the consequences. As Henry David Thoreau stated, “Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty.” Great figures such as Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr embraced Thoreau’s words to make their societies better, and Americans today have used the principle as well. All show that peaceful resistance to unjust laws positively impact a free