Analysis Of Mary Maloney In Lamb To The Slaughter

1444 Words6 Pages
On July 24, 2002, David Lynn Harris was brutally murdered. David had been seeing another woman in secrecy; when his wife, Clara Harris, found out, she ran over him three times with their daughter in the passenger seat witnessing everything. Clara was sentenced to 20 years in prison along with a fine of $10,000. Just as Clara was found guilty, so should Mary Maloney from the short story, Lamb to the Slaughter by Roald Dahl. This story was based in the fifties and clearly shows the roles of men and women. However, when Patrick, the husband of Mary, came home, he spoke of bad news and Mary hit him on the head with a leg of lamb, hence the name of the story. Readers can automatically come to the conclusion that Mary Maloney is guilty. Her mental stability before, during, and after the incident, the logical cover up story, and her emotions and actions towards her wrong doings all prove that she was aware and responsible for the hostile act towards Patrick, and therefore should be proven guilty.
First of all, Mary Maloney was mentally stable throughout the whole incident, thus she cannot be proven insane. At the beginning of the story, Dahl says, “Now and again she would glance up at the clock, but without anxiety, merely to please herself with the thought that each minute gone by made it nearer the times when he would come.” (Dahl 379) and, “But, darling you have to eat! I’ll fix it anyway and then you can have it or not, as you like.” (Dahl 380) . Both of which show she was
Get Access