Analysis Of Michael Brown And Eric Garner Cases

991 Words4 Pages
Final Essay Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases are examples of federalism-civil rights debate and government-sanctioned discriminatory treatment Federalism is a concept of a system of self-sustained units of governments and was considered to be the main idea of the U.S. Constitution. Vincent Ostrom’s The meaning of American federalism gives the definition of federalism as “a system of government where authority is exercised concurrently by a national government and state or provincial governments”. According to the standpoint of the political scientist Joseph Zimmerman, who is an expert in concept of federalism, the Constitution does not extend Congress the right to exercise police power. Consequently, it is very difficult congress to ensure individuals safety. Instead, states are authorized to guarantee, promote, and protect the safety of the citizens. According to the Constitution, Congress is delegated to use its powers in response to certain problems and challenges to guarantee some type of federal of governance system. Division in congress sometimes made this a difficult feat. Furthermore, some senators who were civil rights critics tried to reinforce the concept states’ rights as well as the Tenth Amendment. They argued that states are given the rights to defy both civil rights reforms and federal laws. We can affirm that Article 1 and Article 2 are typical examples of the federalism-civil rights debate, which was established in Burke Marshall’s,

More about Analysis Of Michael Brown And Eric Garner Cases

Open Document