Analysis Of Milgram's Obedience To Authority

The Milgram study for instance was used to determine the effect that authority can have on ones decision making process. Milgram examined this by setting up a study at Yale University. Milgram set up a control room hooked to a fake electric chair. Milgram then had people turn up the voltage to the chair. Milgram would observe how far he could make the subjects “torture” the others just based off his authority. “Ordinary people are likely to follow the instruction of an authority figure, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being” (McLeod 20). Obedience to authority is first response for most humans. It can directly alter and control the way one makes rational

The first reason that Milgram found that people obey is because people feel like they have to obey someone if they have a high social status or a highly respected job, this is called legitimate authority. Bickman (1974) supported this theory by doing an experiment on the streets of New York. Bickman had three men dress up as a policeman, a guard and a regular passerby in a shirt and tie, he then had the three men ask other passerby’s to either pay a parking fine or pick something of the floor, it was found that

Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiment has definitely set the basis to explain the pain inflicted by a human being on another human only if she is ordered to. He asserted that a normal human being can become an element of destructive agents of even when the destructive effects of their work becomes patently clear as they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with basic moral standards.

The two studies being analyzed today are the Stanly Milgram experiment and the Slater experiment. The two similar experiments yielded information about obedience to authority that explains the correlation in society between authority, obedience, and morality. Despite the major ethical problems in the Milgram experiment, it is known in social psychology today that human beings will follow orders from authority figures even to the extent of inflicting harm on another. However, even with this fact, it is also known that there is limits to such obedience.

Stanley Milgram is a famous psychologist who focused his studies on authority and peoples reaction and obedience to it. His famous experiment and it's results were groundbreaking in psychology, surprising both psychologists and regular people alike. First I will discuss the reason for Milgrims study of obedience to authority. Then I will explain the experiment, its formulation, and its results. Finally I will cover the influence of the experiment on psychology and society.

The Milgram Obedience Study was an experiment conducted by Stanley Milgram in 1963 to observe how far people would obey instructions that resulted in harming another individual. The experiment consisted of a “learner” engaging in a memory task and a “teacher” testing the “learner” on the task, administering electrical shocks to the “learner” each time an incorrect answer was given; the electric shocks started out small from 15 volts, labeled as “SLIGHT SHOCK”, all the way to 450 volts, labeled as “X X X”—of course, that was what the participant was told. The true purpose of the experiment was not disclosed until after the experiment and the “random selection” of who would be the “teacher” or “learner” was rigged so that the participant was always the “teacher” and the “learner” was always an actor. The shocks, naturally, were never given to the “learner”, and the “learner” gave responses that were scripted, both in answers to the questions and in responses to the shocks.

In the article, “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, published the findings of his infamous human authority experiment. During this trial, human subjects were tested to discern how far one will go in order to obey the commands of an authority figure. The test subjects were fooled into believing someone was actually being shocked; however, the reality was the other person was simply an actor and never received any shocks. The results were astounding: sixty-five percent of the subjects continued the entire 450 volts, while the rest lasted until at least 300 volts. In response to the experiment, Diana Baumrind, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkley, examined the actions and moral issues executed by

In his article, Milgram discusses how “for many people, obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency, indeed a potent impulse overriding training in ethics, sympathy, and moral conduct”(Milgram 579). Milgram set up an experiment to test the obedience of ordinary people. He tested authority vs the morals of the subjects. He had no theory when he

In “The Perils of Obedience”, social psychologist Stanley Milgram reveals the results of an experiment he performed trying to see if one would hurt another in order to obey authority. The experiments involved three subjects: the experimenter (authority), the teacher, and the learner. The experimenter only made sure that the experiment was performed, while the teacher had to read a series of words and the learner, strapped in an electric chair, had to remember the words read to him. If the learner incorrectly responded to the teacher, the learner would be given an electric shock. As the learner starts to give wrong answers the shock level rises.

In his study on obedience, Milgram found that the presence or absence of a clear authority directly affects people's behaviour.

Milgram's Obedience to Authority Experiment video shows an experiment that explores how authority, or someone in authority, can impact the actions of the individual. While the individual may know that their actions are not good, they can be swayed by an authority figure to carry out actions that the individual would not normally do. This is because the authority figure persuades them to alter their actions because it is necessary for the greater good of the cause at hand. This is possible because the individual's fear of non-conformity may override their concerns of others, and they feel they are able to defer the responsibility of their actions to the authority figure.

Stanley MIlgram is a Yale University social psychologist who wrote “Behavioral Study of Obedience”, an article which granted him many awards and is now considered a landmark. In this piece, he evaluates the extent to which a participant is willing to conform to an authority figure who commands him to execute acts that conflict with his moral beliefs. Milgram discovers that the majority of participants do obey to authority. In this research, the subjects are misled because they are part of a learning experience that is not about what they are told. This experiment was appropriate despite this. Throughout the process, subjects are exposed to various signs that show them

Throughout America’s educational system the idea of “be a leader not a follower” is often times presented to students. So the question is why do many fall into the follower category if we are encouraged to be individuals. Does it stem our natural instinct. Just think everyday we are told when to attend class, how long we should be at class, when assignments are due, and the list continues. This is just at school, think of the common rules that every American citizen follows. We are told, how fast we can drive, what you can’t say, and even where you can do thinks like smoke. So why do we conform? Why do the majority of the country follow or obey the rules?

It’s important to explore the sociology and psychology behind people choosing to obey authority even against their own conscience because it can help us recognize and resist influence directed towards us and others. In this research paper, we will explore the obedience class of social influence.

Obedience is somewhat similar, however we perceive the person giving the order as authoritative, therefore have to comply with the order. This is common within a workplace and settings such as the Military (www.changingminds.org). There are two main types of social influence – Normative and Informational. Normative social influence can encourage us to conform because of a desire to be liked and accepted by certain groups, such as our parents and friends. However, our public behaviour will not sway our private opinion - we will temporarily change our opinion when with the reference group in order to fit in. An example of this is when a teenager may smoke as the reference group smoke. Informational social influence is when we conform because we believe the knowledge or judgement that has been relayed to us by others, therefore this will change our private