Analysis Of Mixed Blood By Jefferson Fisher

Sociologist define race as a “socially defined category based on real or percived biological differnces between groups of people”. In the 19th century biologist came up with the three different categories that groups the three human races: Mongoloid, Causasoid and Negroid. They belived that different races where charaterized by biological makeup. But modern sciences have proved that theory to be wrong because there is no such thing as a “pure” race. We are 99.9% genetically idenitcal. Race is just a concept humans made up, it isn’t actually real.

Over the summer, I began a series on netflix named Blue Blood. It is about a family, The Reagans, who are or were in the New York Police Department. The show revolves around five members of the family who are in the criminal justice field; the Reagans grandfather is retired from police force, the father is the police commissioner, one son is a rookie in the police force, the other son is a detective in the force, the daughter is a district attorney, and their other brother, who was also a police officer, was killed. With the members of the Reagan family being in different aspects of the job, this show shows different aspects of police culture.

Identity that which we all struggle to find. Miklo is the very same case in Taylor Hackford’s Blood In Blood Out who struggles to prove himself as a Chicano due to his white skin however culturally Miklo is as Chicano as anyone in Onda. The most important part of this dynamic, is that when Miklo gets arrested for killing spider, a rival gang leader, the prison gang system is divided by race and skin color all which he is stuck in the middle of. In prison, is where he would meet Magic a member of spider’s gang which openly fought with Miklo’s gang Vatos Locos. They quickly become friends despite their previous conflicts and confrontations between the two gangs because as Popeye mentioned everything is determined by race. This is relevant as in

This article written by Mark Nathan Cohen, who is an anthropology professor in the State University of New York; talks about how race does not define human diversity. In the article, he also mentions that in school students learn the definition of race based on “biological variation” and not based on their culture. The professor Cohen says that studies on human family tree that were based on their genetic analysis of traits do not show any relation of who those traits belong to. He gives an example by stating that even skin color is not a god indicator of who it relates to because the “traits occur independently in several different branches of the human family.”

“Think about race in its universality. Where is your measurement device? There is no way to measure race. We sometimes do it by skin color, other people may do it by hair texture - other people may have the dividing lines different in terms of skin color. What is black in the United States is not what 's black in Brazil or what 's black in South Africa.”-Dr.Goodman, Race: The Power of an Illusion

Sociologists say race is a social construct, which is the way society can view a group, and their perception of the group. Race is a big example of this, as people could have the same genetic make-up, but be different races. Two people can have the same eye color, and even common DNA through blood. If two brothers had kids, one with someone of Asian descent, and the other brother having a child with someone of Native American descent, the kids who are cousins, are made up of different races. Race is more socially agreed upon, than being of a biological nature. A prime example of this, is most people will same someone is Asian, but they can be descendent of ant country in Asia, while being categorized as Asian. When we look at people from Europe,

In the article titled Mixed Blood written by Jefferson M. Fish, Jefferson compares how races are defined in the United States and Brazil by providing examples of how people are classified because of their appearance. In writing this article Fish’s point that he wants to get across is people are categorized differently accordingly to where it is that an individual is located. But most importantly his point in writing this article is to make it clear that the way race is defined does not give an accurate representation of the reality of things because of what each person considers themselves to be. Fish states, “Consider the avocado-is it a fruit or a vegetable? Americans insist it is a vegetable.

Race is defined in our textbook as a group of people who share a set of characteristics- typically these characteristics are described as physical ones, common bloodlines. We often think as race in relation to racism, which is a belief that members of a separate race possess different and unequal traits coupled with the power to restrict freedoms based on those differences. Racism is connected with three different keys in belief, that humans are in different groups in relation to bloodlines and physical types, that these

In the U.S., the term “race” has different connotation compared to other countries like Brazil. As the book Culture defines it- in Chapter 11: Ethnicity and Race- a race is nothing more than a biologically related ethnic group. Often, the tendency of North American society to rely on hypodescent, leads to stress and lack of self-identity. As a matter of fact, the book describes hypodescent as the arbitrary classification of interracial children as a member of the least privileged ethnic group to which either of their parents corresponds. Besides, in today’s world U.S. population has become increasing diversified. Diversity has led to racial tension between different groups. Latinos is one general term given to people who speak a Latin-derived language (this includes South American

Race. No, not that kind of race in which you compete with others. The word used in this context is referring to each major divisions of humankind. However, these divisions are much more complicated than understood. Ironically, “throughout the 20th century, race had no standard definition in medical, epidemiological, or health services research” (Rondini et al. 2007: pg. 1423). Does this mean that the concept of race came with the development of science and is intrinsically connected to it? Or is race entirely a social construction? These are the kind of questions to be asked when studying medicine. On one side, the argument is that racial categories should be eliminated from health care and research. This claim is supported by the following

In America, race is seen as being biologically/genetically based. However, in Puerto Rico, while race may have blood lines as a referent, there are other dimensions brought into the racial classification of people, such as class, physical type, and ethnic background, according to Rodriguez and Guzman. In Puerto Rico, there is a socio-economic concept of race that is based on time and context. It is important to point out that each system of racial classification is thought to be the only correct way of classifying people by those

They discuss how race came about five thousand years ago. This concept states that the idea of race started in India but many claims to have first invented race. The person that is usually credit with this discovery was a man named Francois Bernier. The author also go in to detail about the history behind many races that include African Americans, Native Americans, Japanese Americans, Hispanics and many more. The authors concluded that even though number of crimes among many racial groups has varied in the past, the crimes that committed by these racial groups usually stay the same. It is also said that along with a certain race committed specific kinds of offenses, they usually have the same kind offenses committed against them. One thing I found incredibly important in this text was the comparison of DNA. Most people will not believe that we are biologically different. I did not realize until reading this text that a molecular biologist could tell the race of an individual through their

Throughout my research, the one thing that I am certain of is that the term “race” is the most complex word in the world. To this day, many people are divided on whether “Race” is a real concept. “Race” has many definitions, but the way I believe most people define it in today’s society is “A group or set of people or things with a common feature or features.” Most people including myself confuse the word “Race” with Ethnicity. However, the two words are very different. The definition of Ethnicity is “the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.” The two words are distinguished from one another by their meanings. One of them represents outer appearances of populations and the other represents the cultural views of populations.

Fredrickson says that “It can be misleading to make a sharp distinction between race and ethnicity when considering intergroup relations in American history” He means that these terms do not have clear distinctions and have evolved over time. In paragraph 2, he writes that ethnicity can become racialized “whenever distinctive group characteristics...are used as the basis for a status hierarchy of groups who are thought to differ in ancestry or descent.”

Due to scientist’s interest in human genetic variation, human racial classification became a focus of scientific investigation by evolutionary biologists attempting to categorize individual humans based on presumed patterns of biological difference. Scientists had hoped to classify humans in the same way that they classified other species. These scientists attached hierarchical titles to these categorizations; they claimed that differences in skin color, physiognomy, and geography were associated with scientifically measurable differences in character, aptitude, and temperament (Smedley, 1998). However, studies supporting these claims have been unsound (Gould, 1981). Categorization of humans by racial and ethnic groups continues, as researchers must remain aware of this historical legacy of the science of heredity as the genomic era continues to develop (Bonham et al., 2005).