Analysis Of Nathaniel Hawthorne 's ' The Scarlet Letter ' Essay

1368 WordsSep 25, 20166 Pages
Response Essay Nan Lei in the critical article, “A Brief Study on the Symbolic Meaning of the Main Characters’ Name in The Scarlet Letter” (2015), suggests that Nathaniel Hawthorne uses symbolism to greatly enhance the importance of three of the main characters in his novel. Lei supports her suggestion by talking about the different ways in which each character’s name is symbolic, and how that directly correlates with their characteristics and their actions. Lei’s purpose is to elaborate on the depth of the main characters names in order to reveal to the reader how Hawthorne implicitly makes the characters very meaningful to the book as a whole. She establishes a knowledgeable and admiring tone towards readers of The Scarlet Letter. This article proved to be very effective in displaying and supporting the authors claim. I do agree with the author’s critique, and found that there were many strengths within this article that helped to make her paper more effective. Throughout Lei’s essay, she focuses on the symbolism behind three of the main character’s names. Through this symbolism, Lei claims that “Nathaniel Hawthorne makes full use of symbols to express personal inner emotions, disclose the novel’s theme, and reveal social reality, etc.” (1). She creates three main points to support her claim, where she discusses Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, and Roger Chillingworth. Firstly, Lei explains how “Hester Prynne is one of the most important characters in The Scarlet Letter”
Open Document