preview

Analysis Of Nature By Erik Erickson

Decent Essays

Erikson. It talks about how this nature deficit disorder that we have, is similar to the anxious-avoidant attachment. He talks about how we need children to feel attaches to the land so that they can reap the benefits of the land. The land is dying right now and because the children are not attached to it, they do not feel inclined to save it. Children will feel more connected to nature if we let them get exposed to it. We, know it is beneficial for children in so many ways to be connected to nature. We just have to figure out a way to get them there.
“The study suggested that free play in nature is far more effective than mandatory adult-organized activities in nature. Paradoxically, this suggests that organizers of nature activities should …show more content…

“Some of the ingredients can be exported (its flexibility in the classroom for example) and some cannot (the nation's small homogeneous population and the relative prosperity of most Finns to name two)” (Pg 204)” This quote threw me off. It made me stop to think that maybe he doesn't value what diversity brings to the table. All through the book, I didn't feel as though he wasn’t taking into consideration the many different families that are in this country. He seems to assuming that families can just magically make time to take their children out into nature. It doesn’t just happen like that. Yeah that recipe might work in Finland, but we are not Finland. We can look at Finland and see how they make it work, but we also have to keep in mind that we also have our own landscape. We as teachers want more time outside with the children, but the corporations and governments that give schools funding won’t support that, because it won’t give a paper trail results. How do you test the creativity of a child? You …show more content…

These would be, essentially, legally protected, natural-play reservations….. “environmental sacrifice zones” play reservations, if you will. It's good to have streams where kids can dam and obstruct the ecosystem; the nature of that playing is more important, and worth it to the environment in the long term. ( pg 240)” I like the idea of a safe place to play in nature. There is no need to worry about any endangered species. The children get to play with nature to its fullest potential and the parents don’t need to fear being sued or predators. It is a great stop gap, but I don’t think it should be the permanent solution. It will give the children a taste of nature, but not the whole thing. The next problem I have with this idea is that if it becomes popular and there becomes one on every corner, doesn’t it come right back to the same problem of destroying nature. All in all, its good in theory, but I feel like it will fail if used too excessively and

Get Access