Analysis Of Niccolo Machiavelli's The Morals Of The Prince

The political situation that prompted Machiavelli to write The Prince was that Italy wasn’t a unified country yet. It was a bunch of city states.

In this paper I will argue that Machiavelli's statement upon residing within newly acquired princedoms is culturally relevant within today's political system. I will prove this by drawing a comparison between Machiavelli's views on politics to Hillary Clinton's campaign for the senate in the year 2000.

In 1513, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote “The Prince,” in which he discussed the characteristics that qualify a leader to have control of his people. Machiavelli claimed that a leader ought to associate with vices that have a positive impact to his rulings to avoid embarrassment, thus building a strong leadership. This claim is policy because it delivers the message of ruling. Machiavelli’s audiences are former rulers or anyone aspiring to become a leader.

Has somebody ever muttered the words "It is best to be feared than loved "? In any context, this could look like remorseless; however, the deeper the meanings are reached once with a glance at Machiavelli's morals and arguments achieved. Inside this essay, I will discuss the deserves, shortfalls and contravene arguments of the philosopher political philosophy and system. Also, I will be able to check up on Machiavelli's personal history; furthermore to grasp abundant any what and the way drive this argument.

1. Machiavelli had spent years being tossed in and out of office and politics. He had always, however, favored power. When Machiavelli was wrong¬¬¬ly accused in 1513 of participating in conspiracy he was held ¬¬¬¬in jail and tortured. Upon release he fled Florence and became a writer in Sant’ Andrea.

Niccolo Machiavelli stressed that “one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved…for love is held by a chain of obligation which, men being selfish, is broken whenever it serves their purpose; but fear is maintained by a dread of punishment which never fails.” He felt that a true leader must be cunning and deceptive, winning the hearts of his people through power and influence. If he could not be liked, he could at least get by knowing he has intimidated these below him into submission. However rash or cruel this may seem, Machiavelli’s argument is not one to be countered easily.

“The fact is that a man who wants to act virtuously in every way necessarily comes to grief among so many who are not virtuous.” Thus being said by Machiavelli, in his book The Prince, as he gives some general guidelines on how to govern a country. Although some may seem irrational many of his views, like war on terror, seem to make practical sense. Ever since the attacks on 9/11, American politicians have struggled with Machiavellian principles, mainly weather or not to use them in their dealings with foreign affairs. When terrorists attack using unconventional methods of warfare that result in the death of innocent civilians, the rules of war change. Suddenly, the elimination of those terrorist organizations becomes the first priority, and

Niccolo Machiavelli and Karl Marx developed theories concerning wealth and poverty in our society, as well as different types of governments. For instance, Machiavelli supported a capitalist economic system, unlike Marx, who embraced socialism in the society. Machiavelli wrote a book "The Prince" that explained how to be an effective leader. The theme of the book is "the end justifies the means." A person could or should do whatever is necessary to achieve the desired goal. According to Machiavelli, there is no concept of a perfect ruler, but only effective or ineffective leaders. Therefore, he claims that there are no fair fighters, but only losers and winners. Contrary, Marx embraced democracy as good practice for the government. This paper will analyze whether Marx would buy Machiavelli 's thought that states "desired ends justify undesirable means" (Weng 1).

The Qualities of the Prince, written by Niccolo Machiavelli, is “one of his most celebrated works” (Prince 219). Machiavelli’s work includes two contrasting forces called luck and character. When Machiavelli mentions luck, he means one’s fortune, chance, or fate. Machiavelli also includes character; one’s virtues or life values. Machiavelli writes about how a Prince should be. Many princes are considered extremely virtuous or extremely cruel:

Niccolo Machiavelli (1469–1527) has lived in an era when the Florence, Italy had become the battleground for the foreign forces and was suffering from political destruction. Moreover, an era of the Renaissance was in the process and being a philosopher of renaissance era, he put forward quite controversial theories and philosophies. His comprehensive work "The Prince" is considered as a remarkable piece of historical writing not only for the age of renaissance but also for the contemporary age. He was of the view that politics has the morality of its own, and that there is no repute of justice or injustice, of brutality or forgiveness, of agreement or dishonor, which should interfere with the decision of defending the state and preserving

Niccolo Machiavelli was the first to clearly decipher politics from ethics by studying politics in such depth and thought. He created the basis of what politics should be and how they are runned for today. His book The Prince is primarily a handbook for all rulers to follow to be the most successful in their reign. His book is considered political realism which means he speaks about only the truth of politics, so it can be used for the practice of governing. Machiavelli’s book is the handbook for obtaining and maintaining power even for today’s modern politics.

The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli presents a detailed analysis of how to acquire political power and maintain it. The author discusses how great men should conduct themselves and the desired principles of a princely government. Utopia by Sir Thomas More illustrates what the character Raphael Hythloday, its narrator, suggests to be the perfect human society found in the island of Utopia. This essay looks at why Machiavelli thinks a prince needs to have virtù in order to rule well, and whether Fortuna can actually foster the prince’s virtù. It will also look at the extent to which Utopia provides an argument that a leader has to have virtù in order to govern well. The essay will explore if there is any proof in Utopia that Fortuna plays a role in fostering virtù.

In Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince, he discussed the need for rulers to occasionally make choices that are evil, but may assist in achieving a common good. He argues that these decisions are required from time to time, regardless of what people may think of the ruler. Although Machiavelli says that these acts of evil, while still evil, must be committed only on occasion to help the state, his diagnosis of the issues wrong with governments at the time is often looked down upon as being much harsher than it is.

During the Renaissance, there was a strive to modernize the world into human outlook which focused on the ability of humans to act and not blindly follow a religious plan. Humanists believed God had given humanity options and potential, and humanist thinkers had to act to succeed and make the most of this: it was a duty to be the best. Niccolo Machiavelli, an Italian Humanist, wrote The Prince as a guide for his own prince, Lorenzo De Medici, to promote himself into the political arena of Italy. He analyzed power and the way Italy could become its own state and keep control. His extensive explanations were driven by his own fascination with power and his desire for an independent Italy. The Prince expresses the effectual truth of things

Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince was written in a time of political and civil unrest in Italy. For decades the city-state of Florence suffered several political uprisings and the establishment of new governments. From tyrannical rule to the creation of a democratic republic, and finally the re-establishment of the Medici family, The Prince comes from Machiavelli’s lived experiences in these political regimes. Machiavelli blames the division of Italy into city-states and the socio-political unrest on ecclesiastical authorities and the Church. The Church’s reliance on mercenary arms, and the influence of the papacy are blamed for the power struggle amongst the city-states.