Analysis Of Santiago Calatrava 's ' Concerning The Foldability Of Space '

In the 1930’s during when Mexico’s economy was recovering modern architecture seem was more for public buildings. The first example of this type of architecture was the institute of hygiene in Popotla Mexico in 1925. This building was designed by Jose Villagran Garcia. The studio inside was designed by Juan O'Gorman for Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo. Juan O’Gorman designed was inspired by Le Corbusier studio in Paris. One of the projects that was very ambitious of modern architecture was the construction of the University of Mexico in Mexico City in the 1950’s. This project was built under the direction of Enrique del Moral, Pani, and Carlos Lazo. This building was perfect for practicing and planning out of modern architecture in Mexico.

In O’Gorman’s piece ABC of Architecture Venustas is touched on but not analyzed to the extent of both Utilitas and Firmitas. Contrary to Vitruvius’ criteria, modern buildings are built using the Vitruvian factors of Utilitas and Firmitas. The architect does not usually have the freedom to design whatever they desire, they usually follow a set of criteria and constraints in the form of a plan.

Throughout history, the makings of an architect have changed by stark proportions and so did the requirements of the finished creation. Marcus Vitruvius Pollio (80 B.C.E), famously known as Vitruvius, wrote in The Ten Books on Architecture of how the architect must possess wide knowledge and expertise in many fields of study, and that his buildings must encompass firmitas [durability], utilitas [usefulness], venustas [beauty] (Vitruvius, 33) and harmonious symmetry that of which is found in nature and in man. Leon Battista Alberti (1407-1476), however, stresses in his book Art of Building in Ten Books that the

Without a doubt, Frank Lloyd Wright was one of the greatest architects in American history and the greatest architect of the 20th century. Nature was his muse and his architectural structures embodied organic qualities. He took full advantage of the technological advances of the 20th century but redirecting the concept of space and employing new techniques; Wright was known for his modern and innovative designs. He believed that, “architecture was not just about buildings, it was about nourishing the lives of those sheltered within them”. Wright is not only one of the most well known architects in America but he is also thought of as one of the most influential architects in the world.

This essay will focus on how those works are informed by both regional and international course. In this context, Sydney Ancher and his strong Miesian simplicity as well as Peter Muller’s affinity with Frank Lloyd Wright’s organic architecture principle.

It appears that from the very beginning, Frank Lloyd Wright was destined by fate or determination to be one of the most celebrated architects of the twentieth century. Not only did Wright possess genius skills in the spatial cognition, his approach to architecture through geometric manipulation demonstrates one aspect of his creativeness. Forever a great businessman, Wright seemed to know how to please his clients and still produce some of the most innovative and ridiculed buildings of

It is the spring of 1982;the venue,the auditorium of the School of Architectre,University of Texas at Arlington.Bernhard Hoesli is speaking to a capacity crowd;his first lecture in Texas since his departure from Austin in the summer of 1957. I have arrived late, having driven the 350miles from San Antonio to the Dallas-Fort Worth area.Though there is a substantial contingent of young architecture students for whom the lecture is only one of a series,glancing around I reacquaint myself with the older faces;the balding,graying heads in the hall----Duane Landry and Jane Lorenz Landry,Bill Odum,Bill Booziotes,Rik Mcbride,and many,many others---all former students of his,and

In the essay entitled “Structure, Construction, and Tectonics,” Eduard Sekler defined tectonics in architecture as an observable expression which cannot be explained in terms of structure and construction

Ray William Roldan has a new single out called, Cowboy Cadillac. I am a big fan of this gentleman he is fun hillbilly country that rocks your socks off. He is back and does not disappoint.

The architecture design he has created, developed all through historical factors and in the last few decades some very exciting

Filippo Brunelleschi one of the greatest humanists of our time, has changed the world of architecture. Brunelleschi

Antoni Gaudi was a Catalan architect from Spain who lived from 1852-1826 and was the master of Catalan Modernism. Most of Gaudi’s work was marked by his 3 passions of life; religion, nature and architecture. His works show various unique styles that he attained through researching natural forms and employing them in his buildings while studying every detail of his creations, assimilating into his design every innovative design solution. He was influenced by Neo-Gothic art and became a main part of the Modernisme movement, even though his works transcended the design of mainstream Modernisme. He used organic styles inspired by forms he found in nature and rarely drew plans, instead much preferring to use models and 3D moulding. His works

Luis Barragán was born on March 9th, 1902 in Guadalajara in Jalisco, Mexico. Son of wealthy, conservative parents, Barragán was raised on an estate owned by the family in the southern state of Jalisco. His parent’s would afford him opportunities that would soon shape his future as an influential Architect. At the age of 17, Barragán enrolled in the Escuela Libre de Ingenieros (Free School of Engineers) in Guadalajara and began his education as an Engineer. Throughout his education, Barragán worked for various builders and, after a few years, for his brother Juan José—who was an engineer. During this time, Barragán’s fascinated with Architecture began to blossom. In 1923, at the age of 21, Luis Barragán received his degree in engineering and continued his

Architecture is often mistaken as purely an art form, when in actually it is where art and engineering or art and practicality meet. For example, painting is an art, when preformed well it yields a beautiful picture that evokes a deep human reaction and brings pleasure to its viewer, however this painting provides no function, it cannot shield us from the rain or protect us from the wind or snow, it is purely form. An insulated aluminum shed provides shelter and protection from Mother Nature; however, it is a purely functional building, it was drawn by an engineer, not conceived by an artist to have form. The culmination of form and function is Architecture, the Greeks and Romans fathered this idea and Palladio’s study of roman architecture taught him his valuable truth.

Different architects have different styles because they are trying to get at different things. Architecture is not just about making something beautiful anymore, it is about trying to get across a set of ideas about how we inhabit space. Two of the most famous architects of the twentieth century, one from each side, the early part and the later part up until today each designed a museum with money donated by the Guggenheim foundation. One of these is in New York City, it was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright. The other is in bilbao, Spain, and it was designed by Frank Geary. My purpose of this paper is to interrogate each of these buildings, glorious for different reasons, to show how each architect was expressing their own style.