Analysis Of Saskia Sassen, A Leading Globalization Scholar

When it comes to globalization, everyone may have a different vision of it’s outcome. For Marcelo Gleiser, the author of “Globalization: Two visions of the Future of Humanity”, a completely globalized world may result in a dystopia. In contrast, Jeffrey Wasserstrom, the author of “A Mickey Mouse Approach to Globalization” and Tanveer Ali, the creator of “The Subway Falafel Sandwich and the Americanization of Ethnic Food” may think of globalization as other cultures sharing each other’s components to interact on a new level and spurring a more “open-minded” (Ali 27) individual.

Globalization is interpreted in many complex ways due to how confusing it can be for people to understand. Thomas Friedman wrote the article, “Globalization: The Super Story,” to explain how the three balances are the foundation of globalization. In Laurence Rothenberg’s article, “Globalization 101: The Three Tensions of Globalization,” Rothenberg explains what the three tensions are and how they have affected the world. By analyzing Friedman’s and Rothenberg’s articles and how globalization affects culture identity, effects will be brought to a better understanding.

A globalized society creates an increasingly complicated set of forces and factors that bring people, cultures, markets, and beliefs together. The improvement of technology, transportation, and communication means that in the last century businesses, governments, and people are being drawn into greater proximity with one another. As a result, the notion of civil society is slowly being challenged because state borders are no longer ‘containers of society’, meaning that the state is no longer a ‘fixed unit of sovereign space’ (Agnew, 59). One of the key phenomenon of globalization is the emergence of a global civil society. Global civil society refers to the ‘vast assembly of groups operating across borders and beyond the reach of

When one or many speak about globalization there’s always a room for debate which lies three broad accounts of the nature and meaning of globalization today, referred to here as the hyperglobalist, the sceptical, and the transformationalist views.

There are various relationships that exist among these two sources. Both sources refer to globalization and what its effects are, and view globalization as a force that banishes barriers and walls. However, the two sources have differing views about whether globalization is positive or negative; ‘Problems of Globalization’ has a more negative perspective about globalization, while source two has a much more positive

The article I have chosen is,” The Problematic Complexities raised by the Dynamics of Globalization by Deane Neubauer. Deane Neubauer is a Senior Researcher with the Globalization research center, University of Hawaii, Manoa, and U.S.A. This particular article discusses different subjects of globalization through it relevant dynamics. Such as: the collapse of time and space, migration and urbanization, wealth creation and distribution, transformation of global media, trade and consumption and transformation of value. The notion of globalization has become a commonplace and through everyday conversation, throughout news reports, within scholarly discourse. The article is meant to bring more clarification to the nature of the notion

The very notion of a nation state, imagines for many people, feelings of warmth and protection, a home, groups of people all tied through social, ethnic, economic, and historical bonds. To protect these associations, borders in combination with judicial powers give the nation-state authority to decide who can enter the country. This essay looks closely at the connections between a nation states immigration and border procedures and whether these policies are just and fair, or they in fact, incompatible with the concepts of equality, rights, and justice. Looking specifically at the policies and border controls of those countries now known as the EU and the UK. Whilst also evaluating the experiences of the various categories of migrant, for instance,

Globalization implies distinctive things to diverse individuals. To the individuals who support it, it speaks to less explanations behind outfitted clashes, more open doors for getting away from the bounds custom and bias, a higher expectation for everyday comforts, and more access to the great things of life; so, private enterprise and majority rules system. To the individuals who doubt it or disdain it, it implies the submersion of national power, the elimination of territorial societies, the advancement of multinational enterprises and the chapter 11 of corner stores, the undermining of religion, and the defilement of profound quality; to put it plainly, private enterprise and popular government.

In the essay “ Citizenship and Multiculturalism”, the author states the concern of how the government to balance the immigrants culture and local culture, even multiculturalism may give benefit to society. Author compares the definition of citizen in ancient time and currently and finds citizens have more complicated definition right now because democracy across global. People from all over the world, with different background and culture are under one government. As more and more immigrants set down in U.S, the country develops as plurality.

The conventional belief is that the single greatest challenge of geopolitics today is managing this dark side of globalization, chipping away at the illegitimate co-travelers that exploit openness, mobility, and freedom, without putting too much sand in the gears. The current U.S. strategy is to push for more trade, more connectivity, more markets, and more openness. America does so for a good reason — it benefits from globalization more than any other country in the world. The United States acknowledges globalization’s dark side but attributes it merely to exploitative behavior by criminals, religious extremists, and other anachronistic elements that can be eliminated. The dark side of globalization, America says, with very little subtlety,

‘Globalization: What’s new? What’s not? (And so what)’, portrays the speed in which globalism has increased through many different factors; economically, military, environmentally and socially. This is an idealist analytic approach, not set in stone. This leads on to

Globalization involves a variety of links expanding and tightening a web of political, economic and cultural inter-connections. Most attention has been devoted to merchandise trade as it has had the most immediate (or most visible) consequences, but capital, in and of itself, has come to play an arguably even larger role than the trade in material goods. Human movements also link previously separate communities. Finally, there is the cultural connection. All the individual data would indicate that we are undergoing a process of compression of international time and space and an intensification of international relations. The separation of production and consumption that is the heart of modern capitalism appears to have

As a result globalisation has also undone some important cultural and psychological underpinnings of sovereignty. However, it is imperative to note that the effect of globalisation on different nation states will not be the same, because states differ domestically, historically, politically and socio-culturally. Therefore, states will make different policy choices in response to the same global phenomena (Held 1989, 237).

The concept of globalization is a complex and peculiar one, failing to be definable by a single, precise definition. Centrally, globalization involves information and goods being exchanged amongst different countries. These interactions and interchanges among countries globally over time is due to an increase in communication and transport networks. Globalization is often divided into three main areas being economic globalization, cultural globalization and political globalization. All three are vital areas to one’s life and globalization is said to have a large impact on each. Although globalization is controversial in the aspect that it cannot be declared just how much of an influence the notion has in the world. Political scientists such as Muhammad Ijaz Latif, Anton Pelinka and Martin Wolf all discuss this issue in their respective pieces as well as differing aspects of globalization such as the role the European Union plays in relation to globalization, the different perspectives of globalization and the challenges of the nation-state in regards to globalization.

Nationality and citizenship are central components of human security on the grounds that they give individuals a feeling of having a place and personality. They give a legitimate premise to the activity of numerous human rights. Persons without a nationality are in numerous nations denied various human rights that natives underestimate, in the same way those people lacked from human basic rights, such as access to schools and therapeutic consideration, responsibility for, marriage and establishment of a family and delight in legitimate assurance. All around the world, unfortunately an expected 15 million individuals are viewed as stateless.