Analysis Of Silent Sky

She was kind of annoying because she was too good at playing a two goodie two shoes, but I loved her voice anyway. John Travolta had the acting skills to play Danny because he was an Elvis Presley wanna be. Stockard Channing, I wish was more a nice girl than when she acts like a spoiled little girl who always wants it her way. I think that she did amazing at playing her role as Betty Rizzo, but i feel like she was a bit old like in her early 30’s to play a role as a teenager. Jeff Conaway was great at playing his role because he knew how to act like greaser, but he also looked like one too. Talking about looks he also looks to old to play a role of a teenager which is Kenickie. Didi Conn was good at playing an airhead so it helped her play the role of Frenchy, but that’s what i mainly liked about the role. Dennis C. Stewart had a bad boy vibe so it helped with his role as Leo Balmudo. He looked kind of old to play the role just like Stockard Channing who played Betty Rizzo and Jeff Conaway who played Kenickie. Now onto the body paragraph where I’ll be describing what I like and what i

The play was very well done and was not dull even though it was catered to a large audience. The musical numbers are very entertaining, and the spectacle, both visual and emotional, is well accomplished. I would recommend this to most children and adults, due to the Christmas themes and general lightheartedness of the play.

The first thing my eyes were drawn to was the show poster because of it’s scientific look. It led me to believe that the play’s focus was on science and theories. The designs used also led me to believe that you needed to know about science to watch the play and the title on the poster seemed to me like it was handwritten which made me think that this play was going to be a play that had elements of a lecture and that one of the characters would be a teacher. Going into the house and sitting down the thing that stood out to me was the set. It looked very spacy and galactic which gave me a feeling of excitement and curiosity. I believe that the set played a huge role as far

I will be honest with you I had a lot of trouble enjoying the play, like I said the dialect gave me trouble, plus my seats were not that great. I did however like the movie quite a bit, but I realize I am a product of a different generation as well. I have been brought up around TV and movies rather than plays

Overall I actually enjoyed the piece more than I thought I would. It had a nice tempo that allowed listeners to be engaged and even when the volume dropped the violins played a softer texture as if they were inviting you to listen closer and pay more attention. Generally, the theme was also joyful which I took notice of and enjoyed. Lastly, I didn’t notice any musical mistakes, and thought the piece was well played.

I gathered my experiences as my compass of what to expect when I come to the theatre. I did some google search before hand to get a glimpse of what to look out for but that was it. Upon entering the theatre, we got some flyers. As always, I looked for a quote or something that hints at the overall meaning or plot of the play. The paper said that the play is about despair hope of outcast people, people who are not 'normal ' in the general sense.

The light was clear and soft. When there was morning in the play, the light was yellow and bright. However, when there was night shown the lights were dark, but clear to see all the actors. The light could appear in some part and disappear in other. Also, the light was slowly and soft moving from morning light to night light. As for the sound, it was soft. Everything was heard well, and there were no sound defects. The sound effects were also good. In the play there could be heard shots in the part of the war. Also, there was a part with coach when Roxane came, and there was heard the horses and moving coach.

They run the audience through American history from the America’s independent to present day through song, dance, and a slide show. Teaching most America’s history is the narrator. There’s no clear setting as a large amount of the play there were a singer(s)/performers under a spotlight or the actors are ding a dance number. The performers were amazing singers.

I am picking Margo Channing because she was the true star in the movie, even though it’s all about eve. Margo was the main actor in the plays and she was a star on and off the stage. Even though the movie did not show us any of her acting, it was clear to me that she was the same person. An ambitious, out spoken, fearless woman that was not afraid to say what’s on her mind even though it might of huts others. A perfect scene that described who she was is when she threw the welcome back party for Bill. Even thought she was the host, she did not care to please anyone and ended up going to bed early after getting into an argument with Lloyd and Bill. She brought a lot of negative force to herself and the others around her. She had a good feeling

Personally, the audio play lived up to my expectations more so than the visual play. While the visual play was excellent and followed the play well, the setting seemed undone. For example, the kitchen appliances were white, which didn’t seem appropriate for an old farm house. Also, the attire was underdone as well. The Sheriff didn’t have an official uniform on and the attire didn’t appear period correct. On the other hand, the audio play provided the voiceover, which allows the reader to visualize the play on their own. Secondly, I feel the visual played provided more emotional appeal. Mainly, the emotional appeal came from the actors facial expressions and body language. Unfortunately, it’s not possible to obtain the same effect through an audio recording. Third of all, the audio recording provided sound effects as opposed to a physical setting. For example, instead the rocking chair being shown, the audio provided the sound of a rocking chair. Another example, instead of showing the dishes like the visual play, the audio recording provided sounds of dishes being moved around in a sink. Overall, the audio recording captured the author’s intent the

The play was a about a woman named Henrietta Leavitt, who was an astronomer from Cambridge, Massachusetts. Leavitt worked for Harvard for twenty-five cents an hour, and found thousands of variable stars. Later became the astronomer for Charles Pickering who was the director of the program. Leavitt leaves her family to go work at Harvard. While working in Leavitt meets a guy name Peter Shaw, who is Pickering assistant, and Leavitt is very interested it. Leavitt Sister Marge has kids and a husband at home and she’s a musician for the church. Leavitt father has a stroke, so she went back home to help take care of her father. Later Leavitt father pass away, so she go back to Harvard, and find out that Peter now has a wife. Leavitt attends Harvard

shall firstly do a summery of the play and give a basic image of what

The concert was performed on the Southam Hall stage at the NAC; this is a large hall with extremely good acoustics. It is a nationally known stage, so the quality of the hall is very good. Generally, the audience was very receptive as it was composed of adults, who were all silent. The acoustics were very good as the hall spread the sound throughout the hall without making it echo. This had a positive effect on the performance, because it was possible for the orchestra to be clearly heard from any point in the entire hall. I was impressed by the large number of students that I saw that night because the show deserved to have been heard by many young people.

Theme – the reason behind why the playwright wrote the play. “Patterns of life”, a slice of reality.

Overall I think the actors and everyone involved in the making of this play did a very good job, even though I liked the performance of some actors better than others. The fact that this translation of the play was a more modern version original play made it more fun to watch according to me. Unfortunately, the fact that I was not able to fully understand the actors’ dialog throughout the play made it less entertaining and agreeable for me to