Analysis Of Stephen Toulmin's Argument

Stephen Toulmin uses his own type of system to help readers analyze arguments. Enthymeme is given as a claim, therefore a warrant is needed in Toulmin’s schema. Following these concepts is backing and grounds. While backing is used to back up one’s sources and arguments to help and support the warrant. Conditions of rebuttal means that the audience should look at the argument as a doubter. The last stage in Toulmin’s schema is to use a qualifier. The argument needs to be ready for a qualifiers to help it a bit more if the facts used to back up isn’t very good to use. Using Toulmin’s schema on the story Dream On by Mark Krikorian will help the audience decide whether the convincing facts can help illegal immigrants. Krikorian uses Toulmin’s schema real well while stating his facts in his written article. Krikorian is an author who writes about just another type of amnesty for illegal immigrants wanting to become legal citizens of the United States of America. Soon to find out that the DREAM Act will fail because it is not sufficient enough to help children under the age of 16 to become legal.

Thesis: In this chapter, the logical structure of arguments, which the book refers to as logical structure called an “enthymeme”. “An enthymeme is an argument in which an audience accepts the “clause” which supports the claim. Usually, reasons are supported by claims which state he because clause as the thesis or thought. In order to make a complete logical structure from an enthymeme, the assumptions have to be connected to the audience. So you can brief and intelligently persuade your audience with evidence in addressing any counterclaims. (Ramage, Bean, Johnson 72-74).

He believed that for a good argument to succeed, it needs to provide good justification for a claim. Toulmin model is an informal method of reasoning. The Toulmin Model of Argumentation was based on two triads: the first triad includes claim, ground, and warrant and the second triad includes backing, rebuttal, and qualifier. Even though there are two triads, the first one is the one that is used more often than the second one. Claim is what one wants to prove. One can ask “what is my main point?” to find their claim. Ground or support is the reasoning behind the claim. To find the support, one can ask “what is my proof?” Warrants are persuasive and logical connections between claims and support. Toulmin model was more like practical – direct – argument. This method is basically a formula for an

An argument is a claim supported by reasons and pieces of evidence. Arguments have five primary attributes. Firstly, argumentation is a social process which involves two or more parties responding to one another’s proposal or claim. For the case of a written argument, the writer responds to the content of the essay through a critique process. The responses should not only involve restating the same claims and reasons but rather providing supportive pieces of evidence to the positions taken accordingly. Secondly, the aim of an argument is to make the audience adhere to the written critique. The objective is to influence the audience with the aim of gaining support to

The Toulmin argument is more of an aggressive approach of proving a statement wrong and the Rogerian argument is a passive approach that will state the facts and allow the both sides to be heard. I usually agree with the Rogerian approach, but in this case I would have to use the Toulmin method to argue against this statement. This idea and argument needs to be refuted and proved wrong. This argument is continually hurting young people and causing them to believe that this is an achievable standard that must be attained. I would argue the point that it is unhealthy, unnatural, and physically unachievable. I would use the Toulmin approach to refute any claim that was made with evidence and insure that my argument proved the statement incorrect.

In my personal opinion , I believe that Toulmin argumentation is used in everyday activities. I just did not know that the style had a name. In my day to day activities, I find myself explain the claims, warranty, and even debate when trying to explain why policy are put in place for safety measures. That is a great amusing video, thanks for the encouragement learning. From the Critcial Evaluation feed back

According to “Argument and the Toulmin Model,” the claim will need to be proven and supported throughout your essay, but is simply an assertion at this point in the argumentative paper (“Argument,”2011).

The part of an argument have six point according to Toulmin model. The six point are the claim, support, backing, warrant, qualifier and rebuttal. The claim is what the writer is trying to say, basically the thesis statement. The support is the claim or evidence. The backing is like building a connection to the reader’ opinion. The rebuttal create what is wrong about the argument and represent the different point of view. Lastly the qualifier are word used in the argument like always, never, might, all, never change to sometimes and etc.

The Toulmin Model’s primary purpose is to learn and analyze how people argue every day. Toulmin created this “theory of argumentation” because he wanted to help people to argue in a better way. I thought the article was very informative and easy to navigate. I found the flow of Toulmin’s argument very similar to the Ladder of Abstraction. Toulmin uses data and facts in order to back up claims and further enhance the meaning of an argument. Much like Toulmin, the Ladder of Abstraction selects data in order to add meaning to the actions that you will eventually develop. Another thing I really liked about the article was how the article explains each of the segments of the article and how they relate to each other. The article addresses warrants

The second video on Writing Workshop related to Chapter Thirteen, clearly expresses a much larger portion of the modeling writing techniques written in our textbook. Diane Leonard begins the process the very first day by “providing each student with a writing journal” (first step) and from that day on as they read stories, the students are writing in their journals answers to specific questions. Her lesson starts with building on students experiences regarding a turkey, through answering certain questions then drawing a picture of the animal and labeling its parts and adding describing words (prewriting) they would need to write about turkeys. Mrs. Leonard enforces the concepts by teaching her students a song and then reading the story out

To explain how to state your claim, support your claim, provide reasons, and summarize your argument when presenting an argument.

An argument must always have a statement on which it stands, and an effective argument provides support for this stance. An argument is similar to a recipe, when provided with the correct materials it comes out strong and good, and when not provided with the correct materials it comes out lacking impact. McMahan provides an in depth analysis of each ingredient needed to make a proper argument. She begins by looking at the literature as a whole and finding the main issues in the writing. She suggest that this should be done because it helps come up with the reader’s opinion and stance on the material. In essence, it acts as a gate way to the rest of the paper. After, McMahan continues by looking at the claim. The claim is the thesis statement,

In other words, the Toulim Model shows how one’s argument can be stablished and be proven. First there is a claim, what a person is trying to point out to be true. This can be seen as a fact or a rule one believes in. Next there is data or evidence to support the claim such as statistics or records. The last concept would be the warrant; it allows for one to see a connection between the claim and the data. As a conclusion the argument is perceived to be true.

The creative writing process video was in fact very helpful. I do understand that writing is a very thought out

Stephen Toulmin was a twentieth-century British philosopher who noticed that good, realistic arguments typically will consist of six parts. The six parts that Toulmin outline in is model are: claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier and rebuttal. According to Toulmin (1969), a claim is a statement that you are asking the other person to accept. In other words, a claim is the statement being argued (Rottenberg & Winchell, 2012). Toulmin (1969) defined data as the foundation of real persuasion and is made up of hard facts and highlight the reasoning behind the claim. The data according to Toulmin is the “truth” on which the claim is based. The data (grounds) of an argument may include proof of expertise and the basic