Analysis Of The Affordable Care Act

The contraceptive coverage in the new Health Care law makes preventative care more accessible and affordable to millions of Americans. This is particularly important for women who are more likely to avoid the cost of contraceptives because of cost. To help address these barriers in terms of cost and ensure that all women have access to preventative Health Care Act, all new private insurance plan that covers a wide range of preventative services such as breast x-rays, pap smears smoking prevention and contraception without co-payments or requirements for sharing other costs. The current problem is that the Affordable Care Act is imposing on the 500 store chains of Hobby Lobby’s religious rights by forcing the company to provide full coverage of contraceptives of the 13,000 workers as part of its health care plans. David Green and family, whom founded Hobby Lobby, believe that the healthcare act is violating their held religious convictions.

As of recently, women have been talking about getting long term birth control or stocking up on Plan B. This is because they are worried the Trump will take away the articles in the Affordable Care Act that say that insurance companies must cover birth control, reproductive health and abortion funding. There are currently provisions in the ACA that allow women access to gynecological visits and birth control without having to pay a copay (Rinkunas, 2016). These provisions when originally passed because a number of businesses filed for exemptions so that they would not have to provide access to free contraception to women; specifically those who may have decided to use Plan B (the morning after pill). Some religious based businesses owners believe that preventing a fertilized egg from attaching to the wall of the uterus is the same as an abortion, and to them life begins at conception (Newton-Small, 2016). Many Catholic members of Obama’s Administration, including Vice President Joe Biden wanted to allow religious entities or groups the right to opt out of the program (Newton-Small, 2016). The women of the cabinet decided that they would

Many men and women in America don’t have insurance or simply cannot afford health care. Planned Parenthood does have professional doctors who specialized in many reproductive health services. Planned Parenthood is affordable, the program takes a patient whether they have insurance or not, not only that, they charge you by how much income you make. Low income Americans have access to these services too. “The United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, for example, created a federal program to provide poor, married women with birth control. (Alan Guttmacher Institute)” “One in five American women have used the group’s services, and three out of four of its patients are considered to have low incomes. (Lynn M. Zott)” According

Aside from other religions that the Affordable Care Act affects, the Roman Catholic Church is the largest denomination. The significant issue is that the Roman Catholic Church believes that using contraception is intrinsically evil. However, Pope Francis the leader of the Roman Catholic Diocese recently suggested that women at risk of contracting the Zika virus could use birth control. Pope Francis said, “Avoiding pregnancy is not an absolute evil.” This is a complete contradiction of the catholic belief.

An extraordinary amount of media’s attention has been devoted towards Hobby Lobby’s slight victory through a decision by the Supreme Court in their most recent Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014). The attention was focused on the court’s decision that essentially negated corporations claiming religious objections to certain contraceptives from participating in the mandate. Depending upon the participation and religious

The subject of the ACA’s contraceptive mandate is a highly debated issue. Proponents argue that it serves to benefit women as well as society while opponents argue that it gives the state more power and infringes on religious rights and interests. Indeed, the major concern of this issue deals with the conflict between U.S. governmental program requirements (as stated in the ACA) and religious freedoms of religiously affiliated organizations. The ACA was made into federal law in 2010, having specific requirements that many organizations need to follow (more particularly in coverage by health insurance). However, there is a conflict of interest between the federal government and religious affiliated organizations (employers). It has been

The Affordable Care Act sought to provide affordable alternative health resources to female workers, like contraception. Business of more than 50 employees were required to cover the cost of contraceptive in which Hobby Lobby, Inc. believed the coverage of these methods went against their faith. In addition, the regulation would impose a regulatory fee to companies

Originally, the major dispute over President Obama’s proposal focused on the coverage of contraception and its “pressure” on religious practices. Some statistics brought to light by the Guttamacher Institute state “that 98% of sexually active Catholic women have used birth control.” Yet, after this was justified opposers of Obamacare then tried to segue into the argument from religion to money. Based on this fact, it’s difficult to make the assumption that all Catholics are anti-contraception. While they may have their religious freedom, they like many others also want to make the decision for themselves when it would be appropriate to have children (Guttamacher Institute).

On Wednesday, March 23,2016 the Supreme Court heads toward a legal challenge created by a Christian nonprofit employers that are against providing female workers insurance that covers birth control which is required by Obama’s healthcare law. The employers call contraception as immoral and they also said that the government should not make religious believers to choose either following their faith or following the law. That places of worship should be exempted from these such laws.

Since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), our health care system has undergone a transformation to be inclusive of every American’s health care needs. In particular, ACA has dramatically increased contraceptive coverage for women. Under the ACA’s contraceptive coverage guarantee, also known as contraceptive coverage mandate, all private health plans in the United States must cover at least one form of contraception in each of the of the 18 methods as identified in the Food and Drug Administration’s(FDA) Birth Control Guide for women (citation2). In addition, Insures most provided this coverage without copayments, deductibles, or out-of-pocket costs. Unfortunately, due to the wording of preventive care services in ACA legislation,

Health Care in the United States is undergoing a controversial transition at the hand of Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. One goal of the PPACA is to make preventative care more accessible and affordable to millions of Americans (National Women’s Law Center, 2011). “Among the many firsts: employers that offer health insurance must cover certain preventative measures for women, including contraception” (Corbin 2013, p. 1470). This requirement has been coined the “contraception mandate” and has generated an uproar among many Catholic employers in the US (Corbin 2013, p. 1470); they believe it is in violation of their basic rights of religious freedom and freedom of speech to be forced to provide contraceptive services to

Under the Affordable Care Act, accessing birth control has been more achievable than what it once was; it required that all insurance companies provide preventative measures at no cost, as well as cover other preventative services. Despite a possible looming change on the political spectrum in the near future, the probability that birth control will become less accessible seems rather unlikely. Even if changes do occur during the Trump Administration, many insurance providers would still provide it for no additional cost. Margot Sanger-Katz author of the article “No, Access to Free Birth Control Won’t Be Lost, at Least…” provides some insight as to why insurance companies would want to keep providing birth control at no cost to the customer:

America has always been open minded to almost every ethical issue that becomes a problem to the public. The president Donald Trump, and his administration have encountered the problem of either taking away or keeping birth control. The Trump administration has suggested this on October of 2017, many groups of women were opposing to this decision, clarifying it that it would impact them negatively for those who rely on contraception provided by their insurance. Women have relied on contraception for years, giving them the opportunity to accomplish things before having children. Many women want to wait to have children, have a career that they can finish, be in a better financial status, but most of all find the right

A major issue women have been facing since you were elected President of the United States is the fear of birth control coverage through their own health insurance plans diminishing. This new commission I believe is a backwards concern for the Oval Office as it will affect millions of women in the United States. “More than 55 million women have access to birth control without co-payments because of the contraceptive coverage mandate, according to a study commissioned by the Obama administration. Under the new regulations, hundreds of thousands of women could lose birth control benefits they now receive at no cost under the Affordable Care Act” (). Not only is this number bewildering, but it cuts into millions of women who rely on this no cost

Moreover, to connect this issue to contraceptive coverage, the article on Private and public coverage of contraception services and supplies the United States from the same source, reviews the variations of contraceptive coverage under the ACA. It is estimated that two-third of women of child bearing age use contraceptives and 65% of those woman are insured through private plan as a primary beneficiary or as a spouse. Because coverage depend on payers, not all private or public insurance pay for contraceptive services and supplies, and a recent study by the HHs reveals that approximately 55 million women have private insurance with no-cost coverage for contraceptive services and supplies. In 2012, the ACA allowed the majority of private insurance to provide contraceptive coverage for