In reviewing Supply Chain Integration, the first article “Arcs of supply chain integration” by P. Childerhouse and D.R. Towill (2011), introduces the five alternative arcs of supply chain integration adapted from the original source by Frohlich and Westbrook (2001). Following the introduction, a classification of the arcs is presented as ordered with the least integrated being inward facing and the most integrated described as outward facing. Childerhouse and Towill further analyzes Frohlich and Westbrook 's theory with the application of “statistical testing using site based data output over [an] 8-year supply chain study integration” (2011, p. 7442). Through this application it would aim to achieve the following objectives: (1) Verify the link between breadth of supply chain integration and supply chain performance, (2) assess the uptake of supply chain integration in practice, and (3) investigate whether some integration states are more common than others (Childerhouse and Towill, 2011). In addition, Childerhouse and Towill would further test all results against Frohlich and Westbrook 's original concept, of the ‘arcs of integration’ as a benchmark to their research. Furthering our review, Leuschner, Rogers, & Charvet (2013) expand on Frohlich and Westbrook’s definition of supply chain integration through the introduction of supply chain collaboration and supply chain coordination. The primary purpose for their study was to “provide the first comprehensive, quantitative
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Volume 7, Number 5, 2002, pp. 271 – 282;
Supply chain management is a practice that involves the planning, supervision, and implementation of strategies and controls to direct the movement of goods and services provided to customers. The intent of this essay is to incorporate a synopsis of existing literature and to provide the reader with a general understanding of how supply chain management correlates with the organizational design and structure of modern firms. The essay comprehensively reviews the components of supply chain management and their integration with functional areas within an organization. The information presented in this essay
Managed logistics, supply chain, and integrated logistics functions within a leading provider of services to the federal government. Supervised, trained, and evaluated team of over 20. Assisted Program Manager in quality assurance and operations leadership to meet all contractual requirements. Created comprehensive monthly data analysis, written reports and briefings, program plans/analyses, and others to support logistics and operational matters. Maintained supply and inventory control using Property Book Unit Supply Enhanced (PBUSE) system.
1. Amarpreet, S. (2010). Assessing Effectiveness of Supply Chain Collaboration: An Empirical Study. Available at www.supplychain-forum.com
Benavides, L., De Eskinazis, V., & Swan, D. (2012, June 22). Six Steps to successful supply chain collaboration. Supply Chain Quarterly. Retrieved August 30, 2016, from http://www.supplychainquarterly.com/topics/Strategy/20120622-six-steps-to-successful-supply-chain-collarboration
The results showed that the greater the complexity of the supply chain model the more negatively it impacted performance. And factories that have used a simple supply chain model have shown to produce a more successful level of performance. Shah et al. (2008) used a field approach of study to examine how a particular health care supply chain was able to enhance performance by decreasing service time and increasing quality in a distributed network of health care providers. They concluded that the use of these principles improved efforts and the efficient coordination permitted a dramatic improvement to the supply chain performance. However, Fredenall et al. (2009) took the part of the opposition on the issue. His investigation into internal supply chain issues concluded that consensus between departments does not sufficiently improve workflows (Debashri & Asoke,
To start, Schroeder, R., Goldstein, S., and Rungtusanatham define supply chain as “the set of entities and relationships that cumulatively define materials and information flows both downstream toward the customer and upstream toward the very first supplier.” Schroeder, R., Goldstein, S., and Rungtusanatham goes on to identify supply chain management as “the design and management of seamless, value-added processes across organizational boundaries to meet the real needs of the end customer.” Organizations have to prepare themselves to the best of their ability in order to provide or their customers. Customers expect to receive the upmost service, regardless of the type of organization they make contact with.
Somerset Furniture is a global supply chain that is experiencing an increase in economic globalization. The company is facing challenges due to globalization and offshore sourcing. The breakdown in Somerset Furniture is its business performance. The company is refining its logic on efficiently communicating. The company recognized the importance of information and product flow. Somerset Furniture is influenced by its success of supply chain management and logistic practices. In this paper Somerset Furniture quality issues will be addressed, effectiveness, innovation, and strategies.
An effective supply chain is the key to creating business value, and with expansion on the horizon. Good planning and willingness to adapt to changes are key to maximizing our results. In order to do this we have come up with a plan that will make Lady Americana mattresses a household name in our target expansion markets. In the state of Oklahoma, Lady Americana has already become a brand that has a bed in almost every home. The current systems in place are effective for todays operations, below are some challenges and recommendations to improve upon this to create an effective supply chain, that will grow with you as your business does.
Supply Chain Management : The vertical integration in the supply chain led them to achieve shorter time frame of release and also helped them to
It is concluded that SCM is not yet a discipline and it is moving in the right direction. We can consider that SCM is an emerging discipline. If we look more closely at what is supply chain management and how is it being framed in research, there is much more common issues than there are differences. There is a common core of subjects taught in most supply chain management programs. There is a set of fairly well accepted standards by which a company’s supply chains are judged. There is widespread agreement that supply chain management is a philosophy or orientation of the way that organizations conduct business and that it is multidisciplinary in
More and more scholars realize that the integration of TPL become important (Fynes et al., 2005). Levary (2000) was defined the integration of supply chain as the aims and methods to improve the cooperation between company and sources, staff, and information, also saving the costs (Levary, 2000). The integration of TPL as a part of supply chain integration, which is a focus on the relationship, location and operations management in each supply chain process (Zhao et al., 2006). However, regarding the integration of TPL as a new research problem in supply chain industry, the scholars have some different opinions in this area (Jayaram and Tan, 2010). For example, Jayaram and Tan (2010) compare the different TPL provider that they find the integration of TPL strategy will improve the company performance. Other research shows that the different influence from the integration of TPL will based on different company situation, business objectives, development strategy and level of TPL integration decision (Zhao et al., 2006 and Carr,
As companies debate on integration journey, it is obvious that organization of various types and material managers from different functional areas are seriously talking about supply chain integration explained Fawcett & Magnan (2002). They further explained that forward integration efforts are on pace or slightly ahead of backward integration derived from their research result scoring a mean of 4.33 (2002, p. 345). Therefore, firms cannot settle that whatever works for them will work for others as internal, backward, forward or complete integrated model serves at various divisions. As a matter of fact, it depends on the functional units that have to be integrated and what kind of product and services are offered by the company. Single-firm integration is very challenging tackling issues such as risk sharing and rewards across organizations, meshing information systems and coordinating measures is
Q1) In today’s business environment, no enterprise can expect to build a successful product, process, or service advantage without affiliating their strategies with those of the supply chain system in which they are heavily linked. The literature examined for the purpose of this essay identifies the many different definitions of Supply Chain Management and the overall effectiveness of supply chain management to a business in the twenty first century. This essay also highlights whether supply chain management is a passing fad or a fundamental change.
In today 's competitive business environment many firms face the arduous mission of managing their supply chain. In an effort to gain competitive advantage, firms must make key decision involving logistics and operations management to move products and service across the supply chain. The materialization and attractiveness of the Internet has made supply chain management more attainable for business enterprises. Research shows that Internet-derived technology has enabled companies to build and deploy supply chain management systems to perform key business decisions involving product flow and scheduling, process design and selection, product sourcing, layout, job design, and technology management.