Analysis Of The Article ' Cracking The Cornfields : Recruiting Illicit Stimulant Drug Users

A. the literature review provided articles that were relevant and a number of relevant studies and theories were described throughout the study.

___V. Uses, Value, Strengths, Weaknesses, Professional Commentary in literature - This article is a meta-analysis of

In the wake of listening back to my recorded interviews and analyzing my findings I undeniably discovered more about my participants than I expected, and I’m sure all six of my participators could say the same for themselves. From what I observed while interviewing each participant, I noticed each respondent expressed that they never thought of most of the questions I was asking. That was my initial plan for these thought-provoking interviews; to not only ask questions in order to get results back, but to guide participants to gain further insight of their illicit drug use. At one point during my interviews, all of my participants eventually admitted they never examined how much their drug use had impacted their lives, just as I anticipated. My sixth participants “Key”, even humorously claimed, “It never once crossed my mind.” The concepts of my interview questions were what ignited these light bulb moments.

Each selected article was assessed for quality completed separately by the previous two authors using the Cochrane Back Review Group risk of bias criteria; greater than 6/12 indicated high quality or low risk of bias.8 The results from this assessment were included in the meta-analysis, in addition to another table with each study’s characteristics and results.

Literature review is necessary and essential skill for researcher as it explains and justifies why the topic is chosen and its importance (Abbot, 1993).

The Literature Review is vital to the process as it provides objective support data and rationales for the arguments in the proposal and the development of the interventions. It is a well-developed review of relevant information from creditable sources to lean support to the approaches presented in the proposal.

A Literature review is an essential and intense appraisal of previous research, it bestows a groundwork on which, to base a novel evidence and typically performed afore data collection, for it magnifies upon the aims of selecting a specific research question (Polit & Beck, 2017).

“Reviewing the literature will inform the author the scope of the topic and the gaps evident in literature. Uncovering the body of literature in the field of science and practice is dynamic and evolving intellectual and practice focused endeavor” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011, p. 415).

According to Baridam (2001), it is not enough to review literature without presenting the studies by topic and determining how each of these topics relates to the researcher’s own study. A systematic presentation of the literature forms the foundation of the study.

Prior to the start of the literature review assignment, it never crossed my mind that there are critical steps to follow in order to get it done properly. The review was one of my first encounters leading to a solid understanding of the purpose

Drug abuse is a multifaceted problem that is highly correlated to crime. It can be understood in three different perspectives that drug abuse causes crime, crime causes drug abuse, and drug abuse, as well as crime, is linked to broad factors. The broad factors involve the international drug trade affecting local

Systematic review can help researcher in accumulating knowledge from the range of studies. Systematic literature review can enhance methodological rigor and also shows opportunities for further research. A systematic review addresses a specific question, utilizes explicit and transparent methods to perform a through literature search and critical appraisal of individual studies from which we can conclude what presently we know and we do not know ( Briner and Denyer, 2012 ).

51). The meta-analytical approach advocated by Glass (1976) includes the aggregation of relevant findings from empirical studies as summarized by the effect size, as well as an analysis of relevant variables which may operate on the dependent and/or independent variables of each empirical study included in the analysis. Suri describes advantages of the meta-analytic approach over the traditional narrative review; these include: (1) identification of effects, (2) analysis of operating moderating variables, (3) an explicit explanation and rationale for study inclusion criteria, and (4) the methodological flexibility to include a large number of empirical studies. Suri reports that criticisms include a tendency to over generalize findings, the potential to include poorly designed empirical studies, overreliance on published juried research, and ignoring studies where effect size isn't computed. D. Finally, Suri (2000) examines Slavin's (1986) best-evidence synthesis. 1. Slavin (1986) asserts that best-evidence synthesis, "is designed to draw on the strengths of each approach [traditional reviews and meta-analysis] and to avoid the pitfalls and characteristics of each‖ (pp. 5-6). Slavin goes on to explain that best-evidence synthesis includes the "application of rational, systematic methods of selecting studies to be included and use of effect size

The term sampling is to be used with care, since sampling usually refers to the principles that are used to select the sources of data (participants) (Polkinghorne, 2005). The research success of failure depends essentially on the sampling procedures (Tukett, 2004).

Hart (1998) put significance on a review of the literature because without it researchers would not acquire an understanding of the topic, of what has already known, how it has been researched, and what the key issues are. In Hart’s view, ‘‘the review is a part of your academic development- of becoming an expert of the field’’ (1998). Hart also offers his criteria of the literature review: