preview

Analysis Of The Article ' Power, Privilege, And Landscape ' Minoan Art '

Decent Essays

The article, “Power, Privilege, and Landscape in Minoan Art” by Anne P. Chapin, seeks to examine the previous interpretations of Minoan landscape frescoes, and add her own arguments towards the debate of religious versus secular. She presents the conclusion that while Minoan landscape art did have religious elements, the frescos presence was not an indication of a religious shrine.However, she also introduces the idea that they helped to assert the dominance of an elite class, who sought to demonstrate that they were influenced and connected with the divine. Chapin begins her article with an examination of the problems of previous interpretations of the landscape frescoes that have become so iconic and symbolic of Minoan art. The true meaning behind them has been contested since their discovery by Arthur Evan’s. Arthur Evans viewed them in a more secular sense. Which, as the author pointed out on page 48, is most likely a result of being raised as an elite Victorian. He was more inclined to view the great artworks as proof of the “cultural superiority (pg 48)” of the Minoans, rather than demonstrations of a pagan religion he had no part in.
However, Chapin does not find flaws just in Evans analysis, but as well with the more modern interpretations, which place more importance on potential religious meanings. But as Chapin points out on page 51, paraphrasing from Christos Doumas, what constitutes a religious shrine in Aegean prehistory is unknown. So to claim a

Get Access