Analysis Of The Atlanta Braves Game Knows What It

In a majority of cases, this view is even endorsed by the tribes themselves (Morrison). They argue that the restriction and ultimate elimination of the Native American mascot would also abolish the nation’s historic view of this cultural entity as characters of strength, determination, boldness, resourcefulness and courage. They contend that these same positive attributes are not only required by athletes, but are held expectations of the sporting community. The pursuant argument entails that there is an inherent oddity in the suggestion that naming a team after an Indian tribe is a calculated insult.

The controversy over the naming of sports teams after ethnic groups has been boiling since the mid-twentieth century. Sports teams in America, ranging from Pee-wee leagues, high schools, and colleges to Professional sports, have used any enumeration of nick names and mascots by which to represent their team with pride and sometimes even comedy. However, the lines of political correctness have been greatly and maybe even intentionally blurred in terms of the use of specific ethnic groups within team names and the use of the stereotypical image of those teams’ caricatures, the native-American in particular. Of the four major professional sports team franchises included in the NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL that do possess ethnic monikers, only two are of Caucasoid based ethnicity, whereas the other 5 are direct references to Native American ethnicity or stereotypes

The names used by professional sports teams are offensive and perpetuate a blatant categorization of Native Americans that further Marginalizes them. Professional teams are the highest level of sport and therefore set an example for the rest of the industry and Americans themselves. By holding offensive names these teams are enabling a culture of racism in America that people learn to idolize and thus overlook. Numerous Native American organizations including the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI), United South and Eastern Tribes Inc. (USET), and over 40 individual tribal governments across the country have spoken out about these professional teams and the disrespect they generate. (Ending the Era) “Redskins” is a term defined in the dictionary as a racial slur. It refers to the bloody scalps of Native Americans who were hunted and killed, then sold for bounties. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently canceled several of the Washington NFL team 's trademark registrations because they were found disparaging to Native communities. (Change the Mascot) Braves is a term that has been used to disparage Indian men by characterizing them all as fighters, it is a similar

Why are Native Americans hurt by mascots/team names within the sports industry? Is it because the sports industry took action of creating mascots and Native American names without their approval? Any reasonable person watching would consider this to be critically stereotypical. The media tends to publicly assimilate people with the foul images that portray mascots on television, yet not everyone seems to acknowledge it.

Native Americans are often offended by racist nicknames, logos, and stereotypes in sports. The Washington Redskins and many other teams are facing this.

Have you ever wonder what is the big deal with teams with Native Americans name? I'm going to tell you about the argument with teams that have Native Americans such as the Washington Redskins. With a lot of people trying to get the Washington Redskins to change their because it's racist, they still don't because the cost of name change and uniforms, and quiet simply their is not enough support to change it.

Prior to looking at this section, if anyone were to ask me about my opinion on using a Native American logo or nickname for a sports team I would be indifferent. I wouldn’t feel right about having my own opinion because I have not been a part of a race or culture that has or is looked down upon. After reading Tim Wise’s article and going through the notes, I still feel like I do not have much say in whether or not these teams should be able to keep their logos and nicknames because I am not directly affected and it is hard to put myself into the position of the Native American people; although, I do understand where they are coming from. With that being said, teams should not have names and mascots that are going to offend other cultures.

Sports teams across the United States, ranging from high school to college all the way to the NFL teams, have derogatory names and logos that come from a variety of sources. Some of the most controversial names come from Indigenous culture, such as the Washington Redskins. The ongoing battle between who owns the name and whether or not these sports teams can use the names, is nothing new. This issue has been evident in our culture for many years, with still no substantial resolution. Although minor changes have been made within different sources of this racism, nothing has come along as concrete as many supporters would like it to be.

The term Redskin refers to the bloody scalps of Native American children, women, and men(Hawks). They were hunted by bounty hunters where they were killed and then scalped. They received awards when they traded in the redskins. These bounty hunters when they hunted them down the Native American skin was referred to animal skin. The Native American mascots should be removed from sports because they are offensive, confusing, and they don't truly represent the team.

Currently in the NFL, the Washington Redskins are being faced with a staggering controversy: Should they change they change their mascot as a result of Native Americans viewing it is a racial discriminatory (Angle 2016)? Dating back to 1933, when the Washington NFL team abandoned the original title of “Braves” and adopted “Redskins,” the debate has since been longstanding (Hylton 2014). Native Americans are challenging the team to rid them, along with all team mascot names relating to their culture countrywide, of their title, but the mascot names have no negative connotation and should not be protested against. The controversy relates back to the 1900s when Native Americans began to feel oppressed and teams began using their titles as mascot (Brady 2016).

Through American history prejudice, racial discrimination, and other forms of racism have been constant in the mistreatment of Native Americans. Through the actions of genocide, displacement, slavery, and other heinous acts, Native Americans still are being racially profiled as savages and being seen as primitive people. Several professional sports teams use Native American people or icons as their mascots. By doing this they are misrepresenting the indigenous people. Having a Native American mascot is dishonorable to Native Americans, and translates to other racial actions, and also degrades religious attire.

The controversy behind the mascot dates back decades, beginning in 1972 Native American leaders urged former team President Edward Bennett Williams to lose the Redskin mascot. These delegations were ineffective in changing the name. However, they were somewhat affective and resulted in the lyrics of their fight song changing from “Scalp ‘um” to “Beat ‘em” (Shapira, 2016). The controversy died down until recent years with recent up rise regarding the mascot. The consensual argument of rallying Native Americans can be summed up by one statement by a respondent regarding the term, “… a racist holdover from another day, a time when Indians were depicted as violent, ignorant and savages by whites who largely were equally violent, ignorant and

Imagery that are “hostile and abusive” to Native Americans, some tribes sanction symbolic use. When the National Collegiate Athletic Association issued letters to schools that had Native American nicknames and mascots, few would have predicted the massive changes that would occur. The year was 2005, and 19 colleges were informed that their nicknames and mascots were potentially “hostile or abusive to Native Americans.

For years Native Americans have been ridiculed, abused, oppressed, and much more. They’re typically the butt of everyone's jokes and have been for some time. Many try to argue that Native American mascots should be looked at as a symbol of respect and that they’re honoring their rich culture, some flat out say it’s senseless humor and that they shouldn’t be offended by it. But what many people fail to realize is that costumes, mascots, imitations, and jokes are all dehumanizing and extremely offensive. Sports teams with Native American mascots contribute heavily to the dehumanizing of Native Americans by associating them with savagery and war.

One of the problems with having a Native American mascot is the representation and meaning of it. It is not represented as a tribute or support of the Native people. Its meaning is quite the opposite. It represents racism and bigotry. It represents oppression. Its meaning is to make fun of and put down the Native people. It is the practice of humiliating them. Professional sports teams use their platform to spread the message