Foxglove Killings Sparknotes

Another thing that I liked about the book is that at the beginning, the wake/vigil/funeral was so accurately described. Funerals are awkward, tiring, and numbing. Meursault

I would strongly people who love mythical creatures, horror movies or books, and most importantly everyone. Everything was perfect, I would rate this book a ten out of ten. People suggested to me that I should definitely ready the whole entire series. I think that this series are much better than Goosebumps , this series is better but Goosebumps are much popular. I read Jonathan Rand’s books for about the whole school year. He really is a great person and a great author in this world. There is a one in ten that there is a mistake in his books because in Haunting in New Hampshire. There was a spelling mistake where there was a “w” in the word. I would read his books forever, he is that of a great author. If anyone could get a hand on his books, you are in a joyride. This is what I typed, and I am out for this

I, personally, loved the author's writing, although I did not really understand why she structured the book like so. With each chapter changing different perspectives and stories, it was kind of hard to remember which chapter went with another considering the chapters where out of order. With each story, I was a little annoyed that they just suddenly ended at the end of the chapter. It made me want to read more and more trying to find the next chapter that went with that person's story. It was also kind of difficult to connect the stories. Other than that, she did a marvelous job grabbing my attention. I loved the analogies that she included in the stories. For example, on page 216- 217, one of the mothers told her daughter about a turtle that eats her tears and then creates birds that laugh

The story goes from encounter to encounter of the deadly virus and the book covered a lot of time but it did so by telling of exposures that had a couple years between each other. Preston is very descriptive, he is not overly wordy to the point that it is boring to read, but there are some facts and details that are unnecessary. I like how he gives a lot of background before a case, but at times I think I could do without so much detail. The overall flow of the book was pretty good. Preston’s writing was not choppy and was easy to read. On the other hand, the way he tells the story is a bit confusing. Although he tells the date at the top of the page, it was confusing at times when he jumped back and forth between

I had mixed feelings about this book. I liked it because of how it was about rabbits and I learned stuff I never knew about rabbits before. I didn’t like it because of how some of the warrens treated the rabbits. It reminded me of some of the stuff I have read in history. I would definitely recommend this to readers.

Yes, there are some looming problems and definitely stuff to hook you in, there isn’t the thriller aspect until Tess arrives in D.C. From there it’s a nonstop thrill ride.The whole mysterious scandal left to solve was a little complex but oh so exciting. There were lots of little layers to peel back and I admittedly was worried this story would focus too much on Tessa playing with the big dogs and figuring it all out herself, like she was some sort of prodigy. Sometimes believability is a huge issue for me in these type of novels. But that was not the case here at all. She was a huge part of the investigating, doing a lot of figuring things out and taking big risks, but her friends were also very involved, as was her sister. If that wasn’t exciting enough, there were extra pieces of Tessa’s life that were like a puzzle to solve. SO MANY surprises were thrown at me and I did not guess them all in the slightest. It kept the story exciting and the entertainment flowing! I can't wait to see where this goes with the

One minor critique I had is when the story line would jump around following different characters. Especially at the beginning of the story, it could be confusing on which characters perspective it was. There was always excitement throughout the book mainly during the kidnapping of Mr. Griffin. The climax of when Mark attempted murder on Sue really kept the book alive. This book displayed human nature at best where humans would do the worst to save their skins. For instance, it was implied that Mark killed his best friends Grandma so he could have potential evidence that could lead back to them. Lois Duncan also did a great job on rounding the characters smoothly. At first, I couldn't depict on who Dave was/ what he was like, to being able to give a bibliography about him in a mere one pages. One part of the book I liked was the ending. It left off with a feeling of displeasure because you get a whole new perspective of the characters, and you don’t know who to feel sorry for and who to like. Sue abandoned her innocent side after the arsenal attack on her, when she got back this sincere note from

I thought that the characters were very involved and interesting, they made me want to keep reading for example in the text when Earl and Greg talk on the phone it’s funny. The plot wasn’t as interesting and it was pretty confusing, like the text kept changing. There were many themes in this book and they all stood out. The story through Greg’s point of view was fine until he was explaining stuff, I got confused when

The book is very well written and was very surprising at parts. The book has lessons in it don’t go where your parents tell you not to go. When you are under investigation for a very serious crime you should not get to even more trouble. Surprising moments made the book good. The most surprising moment was when Buck and tunes who are the main characters almost get shot by a old man named Jumbo.

The first part of the book was really calm, when the setting was being described. When it got to the main characters, the tone started to rise more, and was kind of tense. I really liked the book, it was interesting because usually I don’t like when authors go on and on about the setting, but in this book it really went well and tied into the following event. It was refreshing not being overpowered by the setting description, and the use of dialogue. One of the only things I didn’t prefer about the first part if the story was the use of their language. It’s really hard to understand the text and still try to figure out what they mean when a character says: “An’,” or “foun’.” (247)

She used extraordinarily developed dialogue and is organized and written very well, except the part about the assassin. Probably the best part and person of the book, that she just draws it out way too faaaarrrr. About a couple times you’ll hear a mention of the assassin named Vamp (like a vampire, duh) but he’s never there for long. The only times he comes out is when he tracks April when she is being dumb and “sends a letter written on a napkin to her old boyfriend” (Duncan 36). If only the author put Vamp in more it would’ve definitely been so much more exciting. This is why the end of the book is the best part. In the beginning and the middle of the book it is slow and there is nothing to really keep your attention. I was thinking I would never see an assassin ever again but when he shows up it is the greatest and most exciting thing she

I think the writer has created an exhilarating and beguile story that will immediately hook an audience and tether them to Marian’s character. The best parts about this script were its witty and humorous dialogue, character dynamics, structural development, and concept. Riddled with rising tension, mystery and a continuous presence of skepticism and fear of Marian’s secret being discovered, the writer does a great job of keeping the audience in the dark about the plot until the last second. I really enjoyed watching Dale’s skepticism dissolve away as he began to look into Marian’s past as his character also came across as a control freak.

What a marvelous, delectable read! There was something so addictive about this book; it felt at times distinctly young adult while also having moments that felt so well done it was beyond the stereotype of what a teenage thriller tends to be. It’s taken me 4 days just to collect my thoughts to the point that I can attempt writing a proper review, and I’m certain this will be one of the most talked about books in the YA genre this Spring/Summer season. My issues with this book were minor, and I’ll get to those later, but when I first picked up this book I knew I would enjoy it based on the description stating “Breakfast Club meets Pretty Little Liars”, two things I love to pieces. While this was in some ways a traditional whodunnit, I believe

Once the ghost girl came flickering in to Lucy’s view, I clutched the book so hard I almost ripped the book in half. The twists and turns of the major scenes of the book was like vortex sucking me into the book’s setting. When the trio were fighting the souls of the seven monks in the room in which they were executed in, the suspense was so palpable I could almost taste it. I was rooting for the three of them to stop the hauntings and the continuous line of murders. The book is so engrossing read you won’t be able to put the novel down even halfway through, although you might regret it later when you hear a tap, tap, tap in your

McDonald’s writing style includes a happy mix of description and narrative. His pace is thrilling. Characters continue to be developed, letting you see more and more of each person. Rarely do I find a book that includes such amazing synergy between foreknowledge and mystery. Information is doled out in a way that compels you to read more and leaves you breathless when you reach the end. I am happy to give this 4 out of 4 stars; however, due to sultry scenes, I would not recommend this to anyone beneath