Analysis Of The Book ' The Great Khan '

Who were the Mongols? Most would think they were just a bunch of dishonorable people with no moral and treated their conquered people horribly. But really, they were not that bad if you were not the ones fighting them. Although the Mongols started as a small, nomadic group, they could expand, conquer, and maintain their empire because of their effective military tactics, their religious tolerance and integration, as well as their flourishing trade.

The Mongols were a fearless and powerful group that dominated Asia and Eastern Europe during the 13th century. They did this through their battle tactics. The Mongols often fought on horseback and surrounded their enemies, which was an extremely efficient way to conquer. Their battle tactics portrayed them as barbaric and scary, enabling them to surround and conquer lands. Throughout the 13th century, the Mongols portrayed a barbaric image to the rest of the world due to their battle tactics, severe punishments, and their ability to conquer great amount of land.

They were ruthless and gory. The people of Nishapur, a city in Persia felt the raft of the Mongols. History shows that, “The Mongols now descended from the walls and began to slay and plunder… They then drove all the survivors, men and women, out onto the plain; and … it was commanded that the town should be laid waste … not even cats and dogs should be left alive”(Doc 4). This is where their barbaric qualities really begin to show. They killed all of the people in Nishapur. They did not want one single living, breathing thing to be alive. The Mongols had very strict army rules. History shows that, “... Two or three or even more out of a group of ten run away, all are put to death; and if a whole group of ten flees, the rest of the group of a hundred are all put to death, if they do not flee too”(Doc 2). In the Mongols’ eyes, the army was supposed to be one. They wanted everyone in a group to fight at the same time. If they did not get their way the group was executed. Even if one whole group of ten flees, ninety others are killed for no reason. They did not have any associations with the fleeing otherwise they would have left too. Many innocent lives were taken by the Mongols. Now one could say they were just trying to survive, however they took innocent people’s lives. Innocent people do not stand in the way of survival. They were gory and cold people. They were very barbaric with their rules and

In the 13th Century, a group of nomadic people known as the Mongols would rise to power. The Mongols invaded and took over many parts of Asia and Europe. They were well-known for their brutal but brilliant tactics. The Mongols gained the reputation of being classified as “barbarians,” but were they really? According to Webster’s Dictionary, the word “barbarian” is defined as, “a person from an alien land, culture, or group believed to be inferior, uncivilized, or violent.”

Mongol’s 10 day long raid the Calipph as well as his family were slaughtered. The core leader of

(Doc1-3) Doc 1-3 talks about how the Mongol army was just more than a ragtag horde of calvary. They had discipline and often implemented psychological warfare into their tactics, I.E. attacking a city non-stop so the defenders get no sleep or raising a city to the ground to send a message. The mongols had a system where any deserters would either get killed or get their comrades killed in their place, or if their comrades fail to rescue them, then their comrades will get executed.

While the Mongol desire for power grew bigger and stronger, they conquered over 11 million contiguous square miles. The Mongols were a small tribe from the grasslands who were nomadic people. As the empire thrived in the 13th century, they successfully taken over Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. The powerful ruler, Genghis Khan, helped the Mongols emerge from the nomadic tribes. The empire grew rapidly under his leadership and also under his descendants. However, should the Mongols be considered barbaric or did they create a civilized society? Due to their strong military, tolerance for the different religions, and their positive principles in the community, the Mongol empire established a sophisticated society.

Documents 1,6, and 7 indicate how the Mongols had a well organized military, which enabled the Mongols quick expansion. According to Mongol Oral Tradition, Chingis Khan used tactics toward the enemy, which often caused them to be faked out and expect they had won. Using these specifics, Khan was able to fully attack, while the enemy was under the impression they won. (Doc. 1) Juvaini, who had insight of the Mongols since he was appointed to be governor, explained how the military was “so arranged and able to conquer in an orderly fashion.” (Doc. 6) Conquering as an organized military allows them to be stable when attacking, rather than fragile causing their plan to fall apart. Marco Polo, having expertise in traveling and a qualification/ accurate description of the Mongol’s military as having “skin for armor, brave in battle” and surpass anyone in fortitude under difficulties. (Doc. 7) As the Mongols

In their role of empirical dominance throughout 13th century Eurasia, the Mongol’s were nomadic tribes of herders and raiders north of China, under the leadership of Genghis Khan. Born under the name Temujin, Genghis traits of charisma and reputation as a tactician won over his people’s support. Thus through the act of uniting groups of the steppe (region), he was crowned Khan of Khan in 1206. As quoted from Hugh Kennedy’s book Mongols, Huns and Viking's nomads at war” “the Mongols were triumphant in every major engagement fought up to ‘Ayan Jalut in 1260’ “. A crucial factor unique to this success was the nature of Mongol soldiers in which their life-styles demanded skills such as archery and horseback riding, which was also essential in

How Barbaric Were The “Barbarians”? Historians like to very much think that the “Barbarians” were not actually barbaric at all, but given all the information and history on them, and how they moved from province to province, slaughtering men, women,children, even their own kind, and reduced settlements to nothing but ash and dust, it's hard to believe that these “Barbarians” were not actually, in terms with these historians, barbaric, because they indeed were very murderous and barbaric people. To say that these Mongols were not barbaric in not true, civilizations like Greece called them barbarians because they were uneducated, primitive, and out of civilization(introduction paragraph 3, line 4-7), however this is not the case, the Mongols were actually very smart in terms of military skill and tactics demonstrated by their use of horses, siege weapons, tricking the enemy, and denying the enemy rest(Document D, The Second Wave: Russia and Eastern Europe paragraph 1, line 10-12, The Third Wave: The Middle East and South China paragraph 2, lines 2-6). The Mongols may not have had religion or civilization, but they had tribes in which they eventually united to go and conquer(The Secret History of The Mongols).

Although the Mongols may seem barbaric through their military strategies, the imperial values of their economic and cultural characteristics exceed the barbarity of their military strategies.

The first charge on Genghis Khan with excessive brutal tactics of Conquest compared to other conquerors before 1450 CE. The prosecution question why you needed to kill all these innocent people. They made the point that killing people is not necessary and by controlling them they would have had to Greater control over the land. To this, the defense responded that the people would Rebel if they were not held and so they needed to do what they did. The prosecution won this charge because they were more convincing and seemed to have control over the conversation.

To begin with, the Mongols in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries were brilliant warriors who always kept their goals in focus. The Mongol empire should be described as fierce, their advantage

According to background essay on the Mongols “The Mongols were a small tribe during the 13th century. They were from the grasslands of Central Asia and conquered much of the known world.” They also said that “They operate from the backs of horses and sometimes use siege weapons. The essay also explained how the Mongols were one of the several nomadic peoples who competed with one another for pasture land and livestock. They also had no metal working, no written language, and no permanent homes. The Mongols also were first led by Genghis Khan and did not have a good reputation. The Mongols may have been successful but it was do to mostly negative examples and information. The Mongols were although positive in a way. For example their Yam System, to make them go faster and farther. However, this example and many other positive examples are ways for the Mongols to fight better and kill more people. The Mongols were barbaric because they were brutal and ruthless.

The Mongolians had such a strong and powerful empire that made a great impact throughout history. Through the novel Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, which was written by Jack Weatherford we learn many aspects that assisted the Mongol empire into building the largest contiguous empire to ever exist. The Mongolian empire began at around 1200 A.D. and throughout the empires very long and fairly large existence, there were very influential aspects that were created. The most powerful aspect was that the Mongolian empire had a very strong and very powerful line of rulers all coming from the family line of Genghis Kahn, also referred to as the Great Kahn. Under the rule of Genghis, the Mongol society would be changed entirely. Their military is another aspect that assisted the Mongols to became dominant due to their discipline. And they also had very strong tribal unity having faith and loyalty in each other and working hard together to accomplish their set tasks. These aspects would assist the Mongols in building the world’s largest contiguous empire in human history.