Analysis Of The Boy In The Box

The New Jersey police became heavily involved in a battle over the jurisdiction of the case. Another questionable problem with the evidence was that the child was pinned into his crib so that he wouldn’t move at night and somehow, when the child was abducted, whomever took him, didn’t move the pins or even touch the pins to get him out of the bed. There were no fingerprints on the ladder, not even where the person that made the ladder would have left fingerprints, showing that everything had been wiped clean. Then there was the ransom note that was written with grave misspellings and horrible Germanic construction.

In the article “The Terrible Boy” written by Tom Junod Jonathan Miller was one of the world’s most terrible boys. In America’s eyes a terrible boy is cruel, hostile and merciless. In this article, Jonathan was painted by these descriptions. However, this wasn’t always the case. He wasn’t terrible when he moved to Georgia he just wanted to get kicked out of school, so he did whatever it took. Though in highschool he took on the description of a terrible boy. It all started on the bus when Jonathan threw a open ketchup packet at his rival Joshua Belluardo. They got off the bus and instead of a fight it was a crime scene.Jonathan murdered Joshua. Sadly, though Jonathan was a terrible he should have been shown mercy.

Out of all homicide cases in the US, about one third of them end up unsolved. The unfortunate murder of 'The Boy In The Box' is no exception. The spine chilling case of 'The Boy In The Box' is about the devastating death of a little boy found in Philidelphia and no one knows who or what killed him. The mysterious death left many investigators baffled about who the boy was and how he died. Many people from different places developed their own theories to conclude his death, but like any other theories, there's always something that disproves them.

By the window they also found a ladder, which they figured was the way the kidnapper came in and escaped through. The ladder had two sections, and one part of the two sections were broken or split off which seemed to have happened when the kidnapper escaped with the baby. It was a homemade extension ladder. 
In the investigation there wasn’t any fingerprint found, there weren’t any blood either.

One piece of evidence that help to prove his innocence is the woman who lives across the street and wears glasses. The women who live across the street has testified against the boy, saying that she saw him kill his father through the window of her apartment and the last two windows of an El train. Now it was proved that you can see through windows of the El train at night. However, the woman wears glasses, one of the jurors wears glasses and he can’t even see the clock that is in the same room as him. Now it could be a chance that the woman is farsighted, but since it is known that no one sleeps with their glasses on. Her testimony has been debunked since there was no possible way she could have saw him kill his father all the way from across the street.

During the trial there were debates on how both children were not in control of their actions which meant that they couldn’t be held responsible for their actions. Many psychiatrists had tried to find the reason that made the two boys’ create such a horrific crime. One forensic psychiatrist stated that examining

In the early 2010s, the DNA collected from the scenes linked detectives to a relative of the killer, his son Christopher Franklin. It was the first time that familial DNA had been used successfully. With this new evidence, undercover

The CCA police department began analyzing evidence that was collected in an abandoned building at the Lowry campus on 6th Ave and Alton way. The building was abandon and boarded up five years ago, but it showed signs of forced entry. During the Investigation of the scene, CCA police officers found a human skeleton. The skeletal remains were found dressed in what appeared to be a bloody t-shirt and jeans. No identification was found yet but one of the officers brought a theory to this case about a Caucasian woman name Sarah, who went missing five years ago last seen in Aurora and they assumed Sarah could be skeleton in the abandon building.

A great deal of the paper is comprised of dull facts. Kleinfield’s writing sounds like he just asked a bunch of questions and wrote them down with exactly every detail he could. For example, “He consulted the mirror and blended into the next lane” (283). It seems as though Kleinfield has taken a mainly closed stance on the paper. When Kleinfield says, “A transport team from the medical examiner’s office drove it to the morgue at Queens Hospital Center, where it was deposited in one of some 100 refrigerated drawers, cooled to 35 degrees” (274) it demonstrates my point that this paper sounds factual. It doesn’t matter what temperature the drawer is or how many drawers there are. Kleinfield mentions the weather, scenery, and day in the following quote, “In the frosty gloom of Dec. 30, as a hissing wind spun litter through the air…” (284). We are bombarded by these unnecessary facts Kleinfield

One piece of evidence that proves the boy’s innocence is the height of the father. This takes an effect on the evidence against the boy because he is 6 inches shorter than his father was. So it would have been harder for the boy to stab the dad it would of taking

14 year old Steven Truscott gave his classmate Lynne Harper a ride on his bicycle on June 9, 1959. Truscott had dropped her off before they parted ways. Lynne was reported missing later that night, and two days later, her body was found on a nearby farm. She was sexually assaulted and strangled to death. The community was horrified by what happened to this young girl and everyone was determined to find the killer. Immediately, investigators became fixated on Truscott as the prime suspect since he was the last person to see Lynne. They didn’t consider any other suspects, even though there was no physical evidence linking him to the murder. He was arrested 24 hours later, and stood trial as an adult. (Steven Truscott |

There were many problems with the methods and findings of these witnesses, only some of which, however, could be effectively communicated to a jury in a criminal trial. The Crown invited the jury to infer that in a space of five to ten minutes, during which Lindy returned to the tent with the baby and six-year-old Aidan, she had cut Azaria’s throat and stuffed the body into Michael’s camera case while her son apparently stood by. She had then raced Aidan back to the barbecue area, where normal life was resumed, and displayed no signs of unease or distress until the opportunity presented itself of blaming a dingo for the baby’s disappearance. The Chamberlains were said to have later buried the body, then exhumed it so that the clothing could be placed in a strategic location to lend further credibility to the dingo tale.

re-opened and subjected to DNA testing with the hope of solving them. (Nelson, M. (2011)

The Lindbergh baby case became very interesting story all around the world. As you know Charles Lindbergh made headlines flying across the Atlantic from New York to Paris. Charles married Anne and settle down in a small town in New Jersey with the son Charles Jr. On, March 1, 1932 the Lindbergh 20 month old son Charles Jr, was kidnapped from his crib. The three components applies to this case because the police was called; first officer on the scene was the director Norman H. Schwarzkopf. During his investigation he notice it had rained and a lot of evidence had been washed away but notice some ladder marks by the

We have identified the child and located his family, we thank the public and the media for their assistance in our investigation.