preview

Analysis Of The Devil In The White City By Erik Larson

Decent Essays
Open Document

In the world of criminal psychology lies an everlasting question- what drives individuals to commit these gruesome acts? Exploring the reasons behind these criminals’ actions reveals the complexity of how societal, psychological, and personal factors have a huge impact on individuals’ attitudes towards crime. The Devil in the White City by Erik Larson follows H.H. Holmes and his horrendous story that took place at the World’s Fair in Chicago. As readers delve deeper into the novel, they learn of how Holmes murdered purely for the fun of it, really with not much of a motive. Erik Larson’s depiction of H.H. Holmes demonstrates how societal denial allows criminals to operate however they want. This essay examines Holmes’s thinking errors, such …show more content…

The quote, “Holmes adored Chicago, adored in particular how the smoke and din could envelop a woman and leave no hint that she ever existed, save perhaps a blade-thin track of perfume amid the stench of dung, anthracite, and putrefaction” (Larson, 62), showcases Holmes’s fascination with the city’s ability to obscure and erase traces of certain individuals, particularly women. Holmes’s admiration for this specific aspect of Chicago shows a desire for control and power over others. In addition, the symbolism of a woman being enveloped and erased by the city’s environment showcases Holmes’s predatory mindset and his desire to have control and dominance over the weak. Another piece of evidence that supports Holmes’s power thrust is that readers learn early on that Holmes has his eyes set on Gertie and Julia, and the narration of Ned’s “alarm” when Holmes successfully “flattered” Julia and Gertie with “smiles and gifts” clearly shows that he preys over the weak by using his appearance and charm (Larson, 101). This quote also shows a little bit of an ownership attitude, as Holmes perceives all people and objects as his …show more content…

As shown in the quote “...It was becoming increasingly apparent that Holmes had not faked the death of Ben Pitezel, he had killed him and then arranged the scene to make the death seem accidental” (Larson, 340). Holmes manipulates his surroundings to obscure his crimes, skillfully avoiding certain details that would give him away. This is a quality that calls attention to Holmes’s lack of emotion, as any other criminal might’ve given themselves away by showing too much emotion. Another quote highlights Holmes’s flair for exaggeration in his lies, as he is described as “greatly given to lying with a sort of florid ornamentation,” (Larson, 340). It’s evident that lying is something that Holmes has been doing his whole life, and he feels no obligation to provide the truth, even when he’s about to be caught. This demonstrates Holmes’s uniqueness as a criminal, which includes the mistaken belief that he’s different or better than others and that rules don’t apply to him. Similar to lying by omission, Holmes is also shown to be unique as a criminal, in the fact that he feels no moral obligation and that rules don’t apply to

Get Access