Analysis Of The Employee Rights Act

This is no more apparent than in the poem that is written on the top right of the ad:

When people see or hear advertisements, whether it be in a magazine or on television, many do not stop to consider or analyze the techniques that go into making the advertisement effective. For instance, the Center for Disease Control has a campaign that has the purpose of promoting the influenza vaccination. If you examine the campaign closely, it becomes clear that the advertising campaign targets a diverse audience of all ages, genders, and races who could all benefit from getting an influenza vaccination. In this advertisement campaign, the Center for Disease Control effectively promotes the benefits of getting an influenza vaccination to a targeted audience using numerous persuasive techniques such as association and universal appeal.

While the opposition to the bill largely has not made itself aware to the public as of yet, there are several changes proposed that are likely to bring criticism and opposition of the bill based on the reaction to prior attempts to change the NLRA and the current political and economic climate, especially with the upcoming 2016 Presidential elections. One of the greatest challenges that the WAGE Act will face is the criticism for its support of back pay for any worker injured in violation of Section 7 of the NLRA regardless of their immigration status. This section of the WAGE Act directly overrules the Supreme Court’s decision in Hoffman Plastics Compounds Inc. v. NLRB. Hoffman Plastics held that illegal aliens were not entitled to back pay

In the circumstance of the bill passing, the Federal Executive branch will be left will the challenge of enforcing the stricter rules upon the Republican states while trying to maintain their employment at Odyssey, which can be done using rewards and threats. Passing Hb-1356 will prove to be problematic for the Federal Government as it will leave them with issues to solve concerning the Republicans opposed to the bill. Once again referencing the words of Representative Hiatt: “This bill strips away the heart of what makes us teachers….our individual personalities will be worthless….There is no set guideline that works beyond reproach. What makes us different than Verrado or Buckeye Union if this bill passes? This bill sums up the ethical

In order to repeal the act, “Republicans could afford to lose no more than 22 votes to achieve a majority, and in a statement at the White House Friday, Trump estimated that they were 10 to 15 votes short” (Berman). This occurred, because members of the Freedom Caucus opposed the bill. The chairman of the Appropriations committee, Rodney Frelinghuysen, opposed the bill as well. After the opposition of the bill by such a powerful committee, all hope for the repeal dwindled. This reveals the inner workings of the government by demonstrating how electorally vulnerable members will turn against his or her organization to protect his or her own position of power and how others will join the ban wagon to follow the most influential organizations or individuals within the government. In this situation, the representatives would rather go against a party leader than to risk his or her own reputation and attempt to escalate in the hierarchy of government simultaneously.

Another key player that would support this legislation and has expressed a concern for this issue is Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders is a Democrat and is currently campaigning for President in the upcoming 2016 election. Bernie Sanders is very vocal about his support and

Appellee violates the federal fair labor standard acts by designating an employee as a “manager” who is entitled to overtime pay when that employee’s primary job responsibilities do not require supervising other employees or exercising independent judgment, but do require day to day maintenance activities as well as retail sales.

The Employee Free Choice Act has three bills. The first bill allowed a union to be certified as the official union to bargain with an employer, only if the union is capable to get the signatures of the majority of workers It would have eliminate the present right of the employer to demand an additional, separate ballot when more than half of employees have given their signature supporting the union. Second, the bill would have required employers and unions to enter binding arbitration to produce a collective agreement at least 120 days after a union us recognized. Third, the bill would have increased penalties on employers who segregate against workers for union involvement. According to research, the Employer Free Choice Act did not acquired the needed momentum to pass in congress and unfortunately was not supported by major players in the Democratic party. However, president Obama supports the act. In a labor federation meeting on April, 2008 president Obama stated that he stands up to the business lobby, that he have fought to pass the Employee Free Choice Act in the Senate, and that he will make it the law of the united States of America

In “Propaganda Techniques in Today 's Advertising” by Ann McClintock, the author discusses how Americans are being brainwashed by advertisements and the different techniques they use to catch our attention. Ads are simply everywhere we look, it is impossible to get through the day without seeing one. All advertising companies put tons of research into how consumers spend money or even vote. Once these companies finish their research, they create advertisements that appeal to the masses. The basic propaganda techniques that McClintock writes about are Name Calling, Glittering Generalities, Transfer, Testimonial, Plain Folks, Card Stacking, and Bandwagon. Each one of these propaganda techniques is used in specific ways by advertisers to sell their product or service to consumers. I have selected a political ad which uses the Glittering Generalities technique, a coffee ad that uses Transfer technique, a soda ad that uses the Testimonial technique, and a soup ad that uses the Name Calling technique.

According to the Chicago Suntimes, the article “Illinois Public-Employee Union Members Vote To Authorize Strike”, the author John O’Connor reports tens of thousands of government workers starts a strike against governor Bruce Rauner. The main reason for the strike was caused by two-year budget cut. There is a big difference between first term governor’s budget and current governor’s current budget. Since the last year’s contract expired in June 2015, “ Rauner wants a four-year wage freeze, increased employee contributions to maintain current health coverage, and a 40-hour workweek instead of a 37 ½-hour one”(Connor). Therefore, the Illinois Public-Employee Union wants to protects employees’ right.

This ads use of the startling image in contrast to the small words proves highly effective to the reader in swaying their opinion on the issues of war. By using the color scheme they also prove able to get people on there side on a comfort level too. So the startling but yet subtle nature of this ad turned out to be highly effective in making people think more about difficult topics and also convince them to do something about the

It is very common among the United States’ political sphere to rely heavily on T.V. commercials during election season; this is after all the most effective way to spread a message to millions of voters in order to gain their support. The presidential election of 2008 was not the exception; candidates and interest groups spent 2.6 billion dollars on advertising that year from which 2 billion were used exclusively for broadcast television (Seelye 2008.) Although the effectiveness of these advertisements is relatively small compared to the money spent on them (Liasson 2012), it is important for American voters to think critically about the information and arguments presented by these ads. An analysis of the rhetoric in four of the political

Audience hook: On the surface “right to work” sounds like this is a bill to protect workers, in fact it does no such thing. The Right to work Bill being proposed in Missouri has no guarantee of work, or protection for workers in the state. This bill is targeted at breaking down Unions. Currently if you’re employed in a union shop you also are required to be a dues paying member of that union in exchange for the protections and bargaining a union provides. Under right to work no one would be required to be part of the union that forged the way to the job they are currently in. It seems like a simple fair enough idea that you shouldn’t be required to be a part of the union, but what happens when the union falls apart and there is no collective bargaining to protect

The constant ads get in the way of reading the actual issue. Instead of placing advertising throughout the magazine, I would order them in a section, that way readers know where to flip over to get to the actual articles. I would present the advertising by explaining its function and background instead of just displaying them. For example, "the new breakthrough is a tiny, battery powered electrical system that flashes a blood red light down a lure's tail when it is moved in water. Fish think its injured prey and strike" (Butler, Mike. "New Electronic Lure May Catch Too Many Fish; One State Bans it" Popular Science: 80). This article advertised an electronic lure that catches a bass every seven minutes. Nevertheless, it was more than that, the article gave an informal background of the product that intrigued the readers. I, as the editor, would present advertising in a way that can keep the readers interested, even when reading the

There are minimum rights and entitlements set out in law, which apply to ALL employees, whether it is written in your employment agreement or not.  Your employment agreement cannot trade off or provide for less than these minimums.