preview

Analysis Of The Last King Of Scotland: The Ethics Of Race In Film

Better Essays
Open Document

Picasso, Van Gogh, Michelangelo, Da Vinci, Titian, Monet, Rembrandt, Raphael, Warhol and Pollock, these names have three things in common. They are all great artists, they are all white, and they are all men. The general public could name several of these men before they could name a single female or minority artist of equal stature. The truth is that all historically great artists are white men. To a modern western society that champions racial and gender equality this statement screams injustice, as it should. To combat this injustice society is faced with two options; either scour history to find female and minority artists whose talent was suppressed from the global stage because of their race or sex, or invest all effort into ensuring …show more content…

Western society is filled with undertones and attitudes that are racist, sexist and completely unacceptable, yet society has failed to eliminate them. The first example is found in film and is a persistent form of racism that goes largely unnoticed by the masses. In his article The Last King of Scotland – The Ethics of Race in Film, Paul Taylor discusses the idea of the moral gentrification narrative where white heroes swoop in to save the “poor” “helpless” black population. Taylor explains that in the film The Last King of Scotland white FBI agents arrive in the south to save black Americans from hateful white supremacists. According to Taylor this is an abuse of art and it promotes an attitude of racism through historical inaccuracy. The moral gentrification narrative; however, is not the only racist attitude that must be eliminated. In his article Can White People Sing the Blues, Joel Rudinow quotes jazz critic Ralph J. Gleason’s opinion on white people singing the blues. Ralph J. Gleason says, “The blues is black man’s music, and whites diminish it at best or steal it at worst. In any case they have no moral right to use it.” Rudinow summarizes two positions that are often applied to the issue of one culture “stealing” the art of another. The propriety argument states that the blues genre and style belongs to the black community and that when white people undertake to …show more content…

Presently some aspiring artists are denied the training and platform necessary to develop their talent while other artists are forced to not only be artists but also activists and public figures. In her article Why Are There No Great Woman Artists, Linda Nocklin poses an eye opening question. She say, “Would Senor Ruiz have paid as much attention or stimulated as much ambition for achievement if Picasso had been a girl?” In the history of art talent has been stunted because the talented artist was either a woman or a racial minority. To move forward as a society artists must be accepted with open arms regardless of their race or gender. To create an environment that encourages artistic endeavors regardless of race and gender, racial and gender issues must not be taboo in the classroom. Students must learn how to overcome their differences and celebrate their diversity. Studying art and the shortcomings of diversity that art has experienced can open the minds of students. Leo Marx addresses this concept in his article Huck at 100. He advises that racial issues should be discussed in the classroom, but that they must be handled with care and sensitivity. It is incredibly important to the future success of art that art’s “White men’s club” be a thing of the past. Encouraging the talent of the future is imperative. It is also crucial though

Get Access