Analysis Of The Like Button Ruined The Internet By James Somers

In October of 2013, computer scientist Jennifer Golbeck did a Ted Talk titled: The Curly Fry Conundrum: Why Social Media "Likes" Say More than You Might Think. Jennifer Goldbeck 's Ted Talk is a very appropriate choice for this assignment in a class pertaining to social media. As social media users, we "like" different posts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram every day. This Ted Talk tells us exactly what people can tell about us through those likes, and how different companies, advertisers, and computer scientists use our liked posts to give us relevant content, provide specific products and services that consumers will want to buy, and study how specific people 's viewing habits and interests on the internet have changed over time, respectively.

Social Media is affecting our society in a negative way. From being the number one cause of divorce, ruining people’s careers, and being a haven for teen suicides, many misfortunes arise due to social media. People may not notice its damaging side effects yet it is slowly but surely proving detrimental to all involved in the game. By taking a step back and maintaining self-control, any human being immersed in the frenzy of social media can enjoy its perks without getting caught up in the whirlwind of unfortunate events.

Most everyone has some form of social media. Whether it be Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram people have a way of communicating and getting news from all around the world. Unfortunately, this news is not always correct or trustworthy. Many people are not attuned to reading long articles or papers and just want the short story. Social media readily gives them shortened and condensed stories one after the other. Therefore, “traditional media has to adapt to the audience’s new

Monica Anderson and Andrea Caumont investigate how social media sites are reshaping the news and their effectiveness in engaging their audience. The authors posed five questions in their article, considering how social media users participate in and discover news, as well as the impact of social media on discussion of news events. Anderson and Caumont found that social media users are very likely to share news stories, discuss the events, and even share their own coverage of a news event. They also found that users often spend more time on a news site if they arrived there directly, rather than through a social media site. Finally, the authors state that social media can stifle one’s willingness to share their own opinion and discuss a news event. The authors obtained these conclusions by utilizing data from the Pew Research Center. This source is useful to my research topic as it sheds light on the ability of social media to encourage discussion of news stories.

Social media has transformed the way that news is gathered and distributed. Social media users seek the news through social media sites; for example, 64% of the U.S. Adults use Facebook and about half of those users get news from Facebook. The users of social media also diffuse the news and participate in news circulation by sharing news stories, images, videos, and discussions posts about a news or event, nearly 46% of social network site users have discussed a news issue (Anderson & Caumont, 2014). Furthermore, social media sites have increased the accessibility to news and now 62% of U.S. adults, which is about 6-in-10 Americans, get news from social media. There are varieties of social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube,

The opportunities and challenges in today’s economy which have affected and are still affecting USA Today is primarily due to our technology-driven society (Ferrell and Hartline, 2014). In a generation where information is easily accessible through a mobile device or PC, few people think about leaving their homes or walking in a store to purchase a newspaper. The innovativeness of social media is a great method of communicating with millennials;however, USA Today must ensure that the stories reported are those that will intrigue this target group. In a 1997 article by Fabian, USA Today is seen as a news source that delivers boring and unentertaining news. The paper is also referred to as a sleeping pill, rather than an informative source of

One central idea in this text was the decline in the number of people who read the newspaper. Finley states “The biggest decline occurred between October 2008 and March 2009, when the average sales declined 7.1 percent from the same time period a year earlier.” This statement shows how the numbers declined. Most people that are using the internet to get news do not understand how most of the information is not based on facts like the newspapers are. Newspaper base their information on the important and historical stuff that happens in the world, but the internet base their information on entertainment that attracts more teenage views. Most journalist try to attract the views of teenagers, but newspapers try not to focus on entertainment as much as the internet.

In today’s society you can keep up to date with current information, due to social media. While also keeping in touch with family and friends around the world. Going through their updates, and generating likes. These likes could be the individual’s post about their life events, vacation, or simply just their opinions. It’s these post that are structuring the way we think, as we read their post, and press that like button. Even if we do not agree with their post, we could feel obligated to press like, and then we are influenced. In this paper, I will argue that our thoughts, and morality are highly influenced by social media from adults to even kids.

This research has been conducted due to the fact that some researchers have claimed that “journalism is dying” whilst others have argued that “journalism is not dying but is simply evolving” (Blatchford: 2014). This has been a much contested debate triggered by the decline of news circulation from traditional news sources i.e. newspapers, television and radio together with the technological advances of the internet and social media (Cub Reporters: 2010). This has raised many questions and firstly, this dissertation will assess whether the rise of social media has led to the decline of news circulation from traditional news sources. Secondly, this paper will look at what the advantages and disadvantages of using social media as a news distributor are for professional journalists and the general public. Lastly, this study aims to investigate

Recently, people are now discussing how social media changes our life, whether it is good or bad. Some of them think that social media is a kind of fad because of its rapid development. Others think that it is really useful and makes our life easier than before.

Social media has become prominent parts of life for many young people today. Most people engage with social media without stopping to think what the effects are on our lives, whether positive or negative. Are we as a society becoming more concerned with Facebook "friends" than we are with the people we interact with face-to-face in our daily lives? What will the longterm effects of today 's social media use be? There are many positive aspects, but there are equally as many dangers that come with the use of sites such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Google +, Tumblr, Instagram, gaming sites, and blogs. Social media has both negative and positive effects on society, it is up to the user to decide what impact they want to make. In order to make the right choices, we must dig in and research this topic thoroughly.

It’s difficult to dispute that the journalism industry has been completely revolutionized in the past few decades due to the advent of new technology. Smartphones, tablets, and even our computers have allowed readers to access most of their news from sources online. As a result, newspapers, once the primary way for the public to receive its news, have now receded into the background, overshadowed by dozens of other mediums.

One of the trending effect of social media is attention-seeking. Most people don’t even know that they are seeking for other people attention or opinion. I am one

To wholly have a grasp on how this new founded approach to journalism has changed alongside technology—as well as understanding the dangers such openness brings forth—one has to understand what exactly those changes are. Primarily, those that are writing for the sake of offering information have, whether willingly or not, fed into the usage of social media as it has become a centralized method of distribution that is relatively inescapable with the current times. As such those framing the news for the masses find an authentic avenue to stay in contact via social media that has benefits ranging from, “its extraordinary newsgathering potential; its potential as a new tool to engage the audience; and as a way of distributing our news” (Eltringham, 2012), all of which are deeply different from the presentation of reporting that occurred during earlier eras. Days of strongly structured instances of journalism that could not travel with such speed have been replaced as, “social media has trashed many of the foundations on

According to the 2010 article "Interaction of regional news-media production and consumption through the social space," newspapers, particularly regional media sources, are struggling to survive in an environment dominated by the Internet. These small papers must capitalize upon the potential of social media to generate interest in their product. " There is a strategic gap in terms of media organisations' use of the Internet (despite their developing multimedia portfolios) such that they are not fully harnessing the unique potential of social media to deliver engaging user experiences" (Kerrigan & Graham 2010: 302). The article advises regional newspapers to become 'hyper-local' and fill a local need not met by national sources, versus trying to replicate the output of national news sources. They can use "instant interaction and self-organising co-creation activities" to generate interest and rely more user input to generate content and interest in their news (Kerrigan & Graham 2010: 302). Print is no longer the medium of choice of consumers to research even serious news stories.