Analysis Of The Movie ' 12 Angry Man ' Essay

Recently in my AP English class, we watched The film “Twelve Angry Men”. The film was unique in the fact that it only had one setting, the Jury Room. The film showed no one else but the jurors and the warden, who all remained completely nameless throughout the entire movie and we're only identified by their juror numbers. The jurors were drastically different which I believe added more diversity and made the plot more complex and intriguing to the audience. I don't believe the film had a specific intended audience, I believe that this show can be appreciated by all audiences because it shows that reasonable doubt is a much easier state of mind then certainty.

This essay will compare & contrast the protagonist/antagonist's relationship with each other and the other jurors in the play and in the movie versions of Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men. There aren't any changes made to the key part of the story but yet the minor changes made in making the movie adaptation produce a different picture than what one imagines when reading the drama in the form of a play.

12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose is a twisting story where a son is accussed of stabbing his father to death. Twelve strangers are told to listen to this court case and are then stuck in a small, hot room where they are told to decide on a verdict, whether or not the kid lives or dies. The jury finally decides on the verdict of : Not Guilty. Three major facts that influence the juries agreement that the accussed is not guilty include doubts of the murder weapon, doubts of the old man’s testimony, and doubts of the lady across the street’s testimony.

In the movie, Twelve Angry Men, all of the characters have their own specific personalities. Jurors 1 through 12 all have gone through different life situations and come from different beginnings. On a certain level, the jurors are all connected to each other in one way or another. That would be the strength of the justice system. It brings people together that no one would have ever thought were compatible to work with each other.

The Bill of Rights were added after the new U.S. Constitution was first ratified in 1788. The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments of the US Constitution, it guaranteed such rights as the freedoms of speech, assembly, and worship. The Amendments created a black and white outline to what people would be allowed to do in this country, but, at points, the amendments have grey areas that can be used to justify actions of people considered guilty. Any case can be based around one of the Bill of Rights, like a case that went to the courts in January 17, 2014, was about a family fighting the eighth amendment, which is bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments that were ratified on December 15, 1791. It defines basic rights that the people of the United States have. The Bill of Rights amendments include (a) Freedom of relgion, speech, assembly, and politics; (b) Militia and the rights to bear arms; (c) Quartering of soldiers; (d) Searches and Seizures; (e) Grand juries, self-incrimination, doublejeopardy, due process, and eminent domain; (f) Criminal court procedures; (g) Trail by Jury in common law cases;(h) Bail, cruel and unusual punishment; (i) Retention of rights of the people; (j) Reserved powers of states. (Volkmer, 2011,

In 1791, the United States’ government added the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments of the Constitution and guarantees essential civil rights and liberties to the citizens of the United States. Among these are the right to free speech and the right to a fair trial. Each of the ten amendments covers specific rights and freedoms ensured by the Bill of Rights and plays a major role in preserving our social contract. Despite its guarantees, however, the Bill of Rights is in conflict with the main body of the Constitution.

The Bill of Rights was approved on September 25, 1789, however, it was not ratified until December 15, 1791. The first ten amendments of the United States Constitution are known as the bill of rights. The Bill of rights was created by, James Madison, because many states wanted to have more individual rights and protection for it’s citizens. All of the amendments of the United States Constitution are very important to us as a country,

The United States Bill of Rights was created in September 25, 1789 and ratified December 15, 1791. The Bill of Rights are the first ten amendments to the Constitution that were established to defend our rights as individuals and as American citizens. The Bill of Rights describes the rights of its people. The first four articles of the amendments deal specifically with the balance of power between the federal government and state government.

In the film, 12 Angry Men, the chosen jury panel was far from what we would consider today to be “representative of the community.” As we saw in the film, a jury non-representative of its peers can provoke prejudice and indifference in the trial process. The jury panel in 12 Angry Men consisted of all white men who were all middle-aged with the exception of two elder fellows. The defendant in this case was a young, Puerto Rican male. Before deliberation, the jurors took an initial vote count to see which men were leaning toward a verdict of guilty, and which ones were leaning to vote not guilty. The count was 11 to 1. Only one man was reasonable and brave enough to challenge the majority, and presume the boy’s innocence. From the very beginning, a more diverse jury could have remedied this imbalance. It is a concern that a jury consisting of all white members

The Bill of Rights was created to give power to the states and the people. The first ten amendments were really what changed this country. Many of these amendments were created to protect the people, of all race and ethnicity. During the civil rights movement, there were a couple of amendments that were created to protect people of a different race, mainly blacks.

The Bill of Rights is one of quite a few very important documents made. It contains the first 10 of 27 amendments in the U.S Constitution. This document was initially made to state peoples’ rights and protect them from any type of unfair treatment from the government. The amendments were passed to the U.S Constitution on September 25, 1789 but the Bill of Rights was rewritten with the first 10 amendments on December 15, 1791 by James Madison.

Idealized Influence – defined by the values, morals, and ethical principles of a leader and is manifest through behaviours that supress self interest and focus on the good of the collective.

An individual's past experiences can have an incredible impact on the way they think and behave for years to come. So, the past have a significant impact on an individual. In my own life, I have had past experiences that have affected me to be the person I am today. One example is, whenever I walked through the downtown part of Edmonton and I noticed a lot of homeless people lying around on the streets. I felt so bad for those poor people that didn’t have a place to live. They appreciate anything and everything they get. This really effects me and teaches me to be more grateful in life. And appreciate everything I have. In the play the 12 Angry Men, jurors 3, 5, and 11 prove that their experiences has affected who they are. I believe that juror 3’s family issues such as his problems with his son has affected him to become an aggressive man. Additionally, juror 5 has had a background of living in a slum all his life. Therefore, he tries to prove that not all people living in slums are criminals. Lastly, juror 11 struggles with others judging him because he is a European Refugee. This affected him by making him feel unconfident about himself and feels that the others jurors don't take his opinion too seriously.

The movie Twelve Angry Men is about the twelve jurors that could adjust their influence in a decision-making process for conviction an eighteen years-old boy, whether the boy guilty or not guilty in murdering of his father. It represents a perfect example for applicable of a work group development framework. It also has examples of influence techniques among a group’s members. This paper is looking at those specific examples in the movie and focusing in analysis the reasons why Juror 8 is so much more effective than others in the meeting.