Analysis Of The Netherland Based Royal Philips Electronics Company

The most important resource, and the one in least supply, is additional time for those involved in restructuring. When implementing change, you must be creative with time, all the plans be perfect however if there is no time for the people involved to come together the perfect plans cannot be executed. Guideline five, acknowledge the emotional reaction to change. When implementing change, you should anticipate emotional reactions to change. The stages of emotions are; uninformed optimism, informed pessimism, hopeful realism, informed optimism, and a sense of rewarding completion. Guideline six, anticipate restructuring problems and identify problem-solving skills. Attitude and emotional issues; process factors such as lack of coordination, planning, or communication; and lack of resources are a few problems that should be anticipated whenever change is being facilitated. Other predictable problems are unanticipated crises, competing demands, limiting physical environments and perceived low or minimal control among those involved in the change effort. Effective problem solving approaches

A major report on the quality of working life refers to organisations in the 1990s as in a state of constant change. According sixty-one per cent of managers says their organisations have carried out restructuring in the past year. A report shows the managers in these organisation say this has led

In the course of this change, senior managers wish the whole organization can fit with the changed situation and the operation of the new reorganized structure can be more smooth and efficient. But also through this change, the middle managers, especially branch managers and

(Refer Annexure for the Figure 1 and Table 1 for the Organizational Structure before the Restructuring and Figure 2 and Table 2 for the Organizational Structure after the Restructuring.)

The first step in driving the necessary change within the organization is to secure an outside consultant to serve as a change agent. The change agent will facilitate and guide the organizational development (OD) through process consultation intervention. In this process, it will be necessary to identify sources of resistance through Force field analysis. Once the sources are identified, one-on-one meetings and group meetings will be conducted to educate the employees on the changes and the reasons why change is necessary. This step will find the management team working to re-define the vision of the organization. As part of motivating the

Organizational change is a very critical and yet very inevitable process ofan organization’s structure. It can create a lot of pressure from the workers as well as management as a result of fear of the unknown.

6. Organization development consultant David Nadler was interested in developing a model of how large companies cope with restructuring in a competitive business environment. With a team of consultants, he followed the restructuring process of Xerox Corporation for two years. He interviewed the CEO and the top managers at Xerox. He observed the behavior and analyzed the speeches of the CEO and the top managers. Nadler and his team collated and interpreted the information they had collected, and wrote up a detailed account of Xerox’ restructuring process,

The first step in driving the necessary change within the organization is to secure an outside consultant to serve as a change agent. The change agent will facilitate and guide the organizational development (OD) through process consultation intervention. In this process, it will be necessary to identify sources of resistance through Force field analysis. Once the sources are identified, one-on-one meetings and group meetings will be conducted to educate the employees on the changes and the reasons why change is necessary. This step will find the management team working to re-define the vision of the organization. As part of

Organizational change encompasses many challenges to both the individual, and the organization. An organization is a living system, as Flower (2002) states “living systems cannot survive without change, challenge, variety, and surprise” (Flower, 2002, p. 16). An organization requires the ability to adapt in to survive as Darwin states in The Origin of Man, “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change” (Read Me First, 2013, p. 1). It must adapt to the changing market, global economic pressures, stakeholder demands, and the diverse needs

Organizational Transformation, the second component according to the USDOJ, is what is needed to achieve the previous component (USDOJ, 2014). It is believed that

Looking at three approaches by Freeman and Cameron’s (as cited in Lam, 2014, pg.137), we will consider the changes in work design, changes in technology and change in structure. In addition we will look at what Similarly and Cascio (as cited in Lam, 2014, pg. 137) suggest for steps to restructuring. In these steps the most important action is to communicate to all employees of what is being considered and what is going to happen. Also suggested is to seek employee’s input for making change which could include a round table meeting lead by Mr. Ramon

For most, resistance to change inevitable, for some it is their personality and others it is fear of the unknown. Organizational structure may change through downsizing, outsourcing, acquisitions, or mergers. In this paper, I will be examining resistance to change during a merger and how to manage this type of stressful and many times unclear change in an organization. There are three key strategies for managing resistance to change; communication, participation, and empathy and support. Throughout this paper I will discuss the three strategies above as well as some other contributing factors to change in an organization.

Royal Philips NV and Matsushita (owner of the Panasonic brand among others) are two of the world’s biggest electronics multinationals. After successfully building their global empires in the early twentieth century, they have both suffered financially in recent decades. It is therefore interesting to look at why this has happened and what their future prospects are.

The purpose of this report was to examine organization restructuring. Research for the report included literature based on organizational restructuring and the various processes involved in restructuring. The major findings indicate that the two methods commonly used for organizational restructuring to be downsizing and reengineering of business processes(Cummings & Worley, 2008). Downsizing assist the company to reduce its workforce, and this saves cost in terms of payroll reduction. Reengineering allows a company to change and adapt to the way it

Philips has thrived on its technological prowess, which is a result of their strong focus on research and development. Specifically, Philips maintains a product-focused strategy and their highly decentralized National Organizations allow them to adapt to different market conditions globally. Human capital has historically been a key resource for the company, as they focused on caring for their workers and coordinating business efforts in a cross-functional environment (i.e. technical and marketing managers working on projects together), but frequent leadership turnover and seemingly endless turnaround efforts have weakened this valuable capability. It is arguable, however, that the cross-functional culture is still active at Philips and most of the top management team has completed foreign tours of duty.