In Cold Blood commentary
The passage from the novel ‘In Cold Blood’ by Truman Capote is an account and description of the events which resulted in the brutal murder of the Clutter family. It focuses on a man named Floyd Wells, who is the primary character discussed. This except re-accounts the discovery of some background information, told from a different point of view. Wells, still in prison, implies that his actions practically caused the murder; as he was familiar with one of the victims-Herb Clutter, along with Dick, having been his ex cellmate in the past.
The author begins this passage with descriptions on Floyd Wells’ appearance, using imagery by describing him as “short and nearly chinless”, in lines 1-2. Capote also uses
…show more content…
Since this passage is research based, the interview excerpt provides a more personal and realistic account of the events, and allows for a better grasp on the situation. Both sections are primarily addressed towards the reader, as the quotes were selected by the author himself, however, some aspects of Wells’ interview in section two are more likely to be formally directed towards Capote, as one can notice the parts during the interview in which he describes his emotions towards the Clutter family, expressing words like “A nice family, real nice. I never forgot them.” in lines 20-21 on the second page.
Consequently, when Wells looks back on the past and illustrates the moments of his life that led him to working for Mr. Clutter, the entire second section becomes one general allusion, in which he references various junctures which have become crucial memories. The presence of this in the text supports every event that Capote describes, along with its role on filling the reader in on the details by achieving a certain affirmation of truth. Furthermore, the author employs the use of short sentences such as “Wells was stunned.” And “He couldn’t hardly believe it.”, creating a more abrupt progression of thought, which invokes this feeling of surprise and disbelief in reader. Towards the ending of this
While reading the book “In Cold Blood” you are introduced to the Clutter family one by one. You learn that Herb Clutter is the head of the house. He is well liked and respected by the townspeople. Mr. Clutter was a
This passage can be divided into three distinct sections. The first section is where he uses rhetorical strategies to get his point across. The second section is where he uses a literary device to appeal to his audience's emotions. The final section is where he uses multiple questions to strengthen the
In his short-story “Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street,” Herman Melville presents an elderly Wall Street lawyer who has trouble dealing with the behavior of his employee Bartleby. The Lawyer, who is a major character in the story, serves as the first-person narrator, which helps readers understand his thoughts and feelings regarding the plot and its characters. This technique allows one to infer that the Lawyer is not a round character; there is no complexity in identifying with the Lawyer’s response to Bartleby’s odd behavior.
The narrative switches back and forth to focus on the experiences of different characters. Capotes way of writing and changing structures and shapes is because he withholds a good description of what actually happened in the Clutter home. This is logical because the way the story is being told Perry Smith and Dick Hickock and their families. This is the hook that keeps the reader turning pages. Part 3 “Answers” allows the reader to feel secure in the promise that finally everything will be answered and explained. Such as the journey that the wto men took, driving eight hundred miles during a twenty-hour period, are now discovered by Nye during the investigation, Capote's way of being a journalist and a novelist at the same time. Capote’s
With the use of short sentences such as ‘you go alone’ Wells, H.G. (p43-50) and ‘he corrected me in one particular’ (p44) Wells builds up tension that keeps the reader engaged and enthralled with unease at the beginning of the story. As with the narrator no names are given to three elderly occupants of the castle, this increases the reader’s suspicions by making it less personal
Throughout In Cold Blood, Truman Capote uses multiple points of view. He starts out as an outside narrator that knows everything that is going on and everyone’s thoughts. This is seen especially when introducing the Clutter family to the reader. When Capote was simply introducing the Clutters, he says, “…since his wife’s illness and the departure of the elder daughters, Mr. Clutter had of necessity learned to cook; either he or Nancy, but principally Nancy, prepared the family meals” (Capote 9). Outside narration allows the reader to know things about all of the characters that another form of narration could not provide. This gives the reader a clear understanding of the nature and lifestyle of these characters. Later in the story, Capote switches to first person narration. He has whole chapters composed of quotes from people that were important witnesses to the story. For example, Susan Kidwell, one of Nancy’s close friends, is the narrator of one of the chapters. When discussing Nancy, she said “We were like sisters. At least, that’s how I felt about her – as though she were my sister” (Capote 94). Capote provides this quote from Susan
In “In Cold Blood” (1966) from page 200 to 202, Capote give us the insight into the past of Dick and Perry characters that caused them to resent a certain type of situation or condition. The author acknowledge this matter by showing how Dick and Perry nature being revealed through what they seen and encounter on their get away trip, first he inform us about how the view of the sea, and people Dick see in the hotels remind him of how he growth to feel hostile against people who possessed thing that he known he couldn’t have, “Why should that sonofabitch have everything, while he had nothing? Why should that “big shot bastard” have all the luck?” (Rhetorical question and Parallelism were used to emphasize Dick animosity), “open them up and let
He establishes his credibility early in the text through his comprehensive understanding of the Clutter case, as well as his in depth interviews with the friends and families of the Kansan family, easily earning the trust of his readers. Capote describes the lives of the Clutter and the murders in great, utmost detail; thus, creating an artificial connection between the characters and readers. In every act, Capote never fails to illustrate a scene at length. Rather than focusing on just the perspective of the Clutters, Capote goes the extra mile and implements several stances, including the murders and the people of Holcomb. Capote clearly spent years of research and observation on the case, leading people to acknowledge his expertise on the
Conflict, in the beginning of the book Capote starts sympathizing with the Clutter’s family last day alive. Capote used a strong sentence to give us a point of where we are in the book. In the book it says, “Then, touching the brim of his cap, he headed for home and the day’s work, unaware that it would be his last.”(15) He tells us who the family was murdered. In the beginning of the book it is easy to confuse that Mr. Clutter was the murderer. Then, In Cold Blood the author, Capote, uses many foreshadowing in his book. One in specific is a extremely strong foreshadowing. In the text, “Four shotgun blasts that, all told, ended six human lives.”(5) American Novelist, Capote, exploits foreshadowing in his book. He takes
Rural Kansas was a peaceful, welcoming community. The farmers and townspeople were very close and friendly with one another. Nothing bad ever happened in these farming areas because the people were nice and friendly. Until one frightful night, everything changed. Back in 1959, the town of Holcomb, Kansas was absolutely shocked and taken aback by the news of killings that occurred in their small town. The victims were a well-known and loved family from the community. They were brutally murdered in their rural farmhouse. Truman Capote unravels the secrets, rumors, suspicions, and truth about the crime of the small town murder of the Clutter family in his non-fiction book, In Cold Blood: A True Account of a Multiple Murder and Its Consequences.
In Cold Blood, written by Truman Capote, is a book that encloses the true story of a family, the Clutters, whose lives were brutally ended by the barrel of a 12-gauge shotgun. The killers were 2 men, each with 2 different backgrounds and personalities, each with his own reasons to take part in such a harrowing deed. Capote illustrates the events leading up to the murder in sharp detail and describes its aftermath with such a perspective that one feels that he is right there with the culprits, whose names are Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. They had very critical roles in the murder and how they themselves were caught, and in many ways they were foils for one another. Through Capote's extensive descriptions
When the Clutter family does not answer their phone or their door Nancy Ewalt, a friend of Nancy Clutter's, goes inside to look around. Nancy ran out of the house and screamed "She's dead! and flung herself into her daddy's arms..."It's true Daddy! Nancy is dead!" (60) This part of the novel expresses Nancy's tone of being frightened and also very shocked. Another example of tone is when Perry was talking to Dick about a connection while sitting in a hotel room after committing the murders. Dick states, "But on the whole it was perfect. We hit the ball right out of the park. It's lost. And It is going to stay lost. There isn't a single connection" (91) Perry automatically comes back to say " I can think of one… Floyd—is that the name?" (91) This shows that Perry is being witty. Capote even says that the statement hit dick a little below the belt. Perry does not mean to shock Dick but only give him a taste of his own medicine. Capote uses tone to show the readers the emotional side of the
The town had trouble understanding who would perform such a crime, and why they would do that to a family that represented everything that people respect. Everyone that surrounded the Clutters becomes a suspect including the unlikely Bobby Rupp. A thorough murder investigation takes place where the Police believed that robbery was the motive. As the townspeople continue their “Christian Duty” of cleaning up after the crime, Capote transitions to Perry’s journey the Mexico. Perry struggles with his role in the murder saying that “There’s got to be something wrong with somebody who’d do a thing like that” (p.131). He mentions that he still thinks of the killings, and is trying to distance himself from the crime. Dick’s thoughts, on the the other hand, don't change; he thinks of himself as a totally normal person. This chapter shows that Dick, Perry, and the town of Holcomb are all affected by the loss is the Holcomb family in different ways. Immediate effects of the murder were shown and the psychological trauma is experienced by several characters.
In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, he uses linear sequence of events to give you a interest in what will happen next. Capote sometimes digresses from the leaner sequence of events to throw you off, some may like this technique, but others argue that it takes away from the main point. By reading this book, I have the understanding that Capote uses digression to develop the individuals personality shows flash backs in the time period to help understand someone, and to show his purpose for writing this text. We will see that using digression in a linear sequence Of events has indeed many reasoning behind it. Particularly, Capote used digresses in the linear sequence of events to develop any of the individuals personalities.
The captivating story of In Cold Blood by Truman Capote is a beautifully written piece describing the unveiling of a family murder. This investigative, fast-paced and straightforward documentary provides a commentary of such violence and examines the details of the motiveless murders of four members of the Clutter family and the investigation that led to the capture, trial, and execution of the killers. As this twisted novel unravels, Capote defines the themes of childhood influences relevant to the adulthood of the murderers, opposite personalities, and nature versus nurture.