Analysis Of The Poem ' A Planet Of Slums '

The author Mike Davis has done countless research on the topic of urban poverty. In his studies he collects and receives his information from other sources. Perhaps this is the reason why he has a negative view on slums. This is illustrated in his piece “Planet of Slums” as he discusses the politics, urban development, and methods within the slums population. According to Davis, slums and urban poverty have and will continue to significantly increase. While doing so, the gap in exclusion and inequality will grow. As a result, this will weaken urban elites in their work to utilize cities as engines of growth. Slums and slum population are classified as those who are living below the poverty lines, all while, being associated with overcrowding, having poor or informal housing, inadequate access to safe water and sanitation, and insecurity of tenure. This is being recognized as an international phenomenon. To emphasis this phenomenon, approximately half of the slum population in most

Urbanization is a concept that is deeply rooted in the increase in a population within a region in response to the availability of unique opportunities. The opportunities may include the availability of employment chances in factories, investments opportunities in the urban areas, and the presence of sufficient housing and social infrastructure. It is apparent that urbanization began centuries ago in different regions of the world. However, the development of suburban areas has also been an interesting phenomenon over the centuries. Initially, people strived to live in the luxurious houses in major towns and cities. Nevertheless, there was a gradual shift in the desire to live in the cities when various negative impacts of overpopulation

Mike Davis, author of Planet of Slums, predicts the direction in which the world’s cities are headed, and how the changes in living conditions are only going to deteriorate if certain trends continue. The title of his book explains Davis’s vision for the future of cities as he feels there is enough evidence pointing towards an exponential rise in slum populations across the world’s largest cities. Additionally, he expresses his opinion on many issues regarding the rapid rise in developing cities’ slum populations, although he offers very one-sided arguments geared towards those who feel the current system is causing more problems rather than improving current conditions. This causes Davis to overlook the problems of slums as resolvable through different modes of assistance such as international aid programs. Instead, he views aid programs as the root cause of imbalance created during industrialization. Throughout the book, Davis presents information that confirms his preconceptions towards the slums. Therefore, all the evidence that is presented by him portrays confirmation bias as Davis fails to mention anything about the resolution of the problem of the growing number of slums and instead sees this problem as unavoidable. Particularly, Davis’ writing, although intended for the general population, is more geared towards critics who have similar ideas. Instead of providing the means through which the economy could be improved and the problem of slums could be resolved, it is

Edward Glaeser, an economics professor at Harvard, is a scholar of the economy of cities and their various problems and regularly writes about this in his famous blog of The New York Times Economix . In The Triumph of cities , it offers a valuable insight into the advantages of large cities and makes a thorough and rigorous analysis of the strategies of some successful cities that can serve as an example for the development of its strategic plan outlining.

Billy Collins creates poems that are readable by all, and injected with humor, but has larger social implications. Collins creates a scene in a planetarium to discuss earth in relation to other planets. Collins’s “Earthling” creates an appreciation of our life as earthlings. Billy Collins in his poem Earthling creates an appreciation for the earth. The use of polar opposites in measurable qualities, such as weight and the characteristics of planets fuels Collin’s appreciation of the earth.

We are experiencing the new era of urbanization and globalization. These days, developing societies are faced with the highest rate of urbanization, since it is considered as a direct indication of social and economic development.

Winner of the 2006 Ester McCoy Award as well as being named a MacArthur Fellow in 1998, Mike Davis has written over twenty published books as well as hundreds of chapters, excerpts and college journals throughout his career. Urban theorist, historian and political activist, Davis has made quite the name for himself in the urbanist community, especially on the West Coast and Southern Califonia where he has taught classes at multiple universities including UCR and UCI. (URI.edu). Davis echoes and often cites the work of other great minds: Lewis Mumford, Garret Eckbo and, of course, Karl Marx. Also in 2006, Davis published "A Planet of Slums," a nonfiction novel centered around the world 's dramatic population growth coupled with economic recessions resulting in cities made of dirt instead of dreams. These megaslums are literally taking the space of any rural areas left while also figuratively destroying the concept of the modern metropolis. In addition to merely running out of space for our ever growing Crude Birth Rate, Davis also blames the IMF and the World Bank for the economic states of these megaslums.

It is very clear in this table that African in green has a high urban growth and Europe in red has low one; these representations support our results. In browsing several studies, the report is that Africa, Asia, Latin America feature the highest percentage of shanty towns, because most of the countries of these continents are in development and often characterized by inadequate policies of urbanization and overcrowding in the modern cities. First the shanty towns should appear on the plans of urbanism to permit a coherent management

The term ‘urban global south’ has emerged as an important conceptual term in debates about urbanization development and globalization. It is a product of unequal local and global power relations. There has been a growing body of literature surrounding the topic of ‘globalized urbanization’ in specific relation to the city due to its increasing economic and socio-political power. The process of ‘Urbanization’ can be defined as “the redistribution of populations from rural to urban settlements over time” (Peng et al, 2010b: 2). An inexorable issue with the term is its origin; most urban growth is evidently shown to be in the global south, (as seen in table 1) with less developed regions showing the greatest average annual urban

A metropolitan refers to an area that comprises of a densely populated urban area and sparsely populated surrounding regions that share infrastructures, housing, and industries. The growth of metropolitan areas is essential for the nation and its citizens because they are the key political and economic regions. Metropolitan covers one or more urban areas, towns, satellite cities, and rural regions that are socially and economically joined to the urban areas. Various studies that had been conducted regarding the development of metropolitan areas, particularly in the United States, have found out that various factors have played a crucial role in fostering these developments. Some of these factors include; crime, race, immigration, and design assimilation. It is, therefore, significant to understand the benefits of metropolitan growth, who reaps them, the cost of metropolitan growth, and who is responsible for paying these costs.

Over half of the world population is living in urban environments and projections for the next 30 years predict that the majority of population growth will be taking place in cities in the developing world. While more mega-cities, meaning cities larger than ten million, have been on the rise, still a majority of people who live in urban environments are living in smaller agglomerations. With an expectation of urban-growth and globalization to continue to increase in the future, it’s essential to understand the ways in which the development of labor and capital have an impact on urban life. There is substantial debate over what affects the growth of cities and who this occurs. There is substantial debate over how cities grow, and what primarily affects and determines their growth, especially in developing countries. I will aim to analyze the different arguments regarding the factors affecting the growth prospects of cities and regions in the developing world. I will first discuss the literature of economic geography. Next, I will evaluate the “global cities” literature. I will then compare the strengths and weakness of these two perspectives. Afterwards I will emphasize why both perspectives offering convincing arguments, though neither offers a complete explanation to understand factors affecting economic growth.

Yet with such a high population, Jakarta 's GRP (the equivalent of GDP, but for regions instead of countries) is one-fifth that of New York City, now ninth in population with over 10 million fewer inhabitants than Jakarta. A more recent look at the top ten economically powerful cities and only two of the ten have changed in the last decade - San Fransico and Boston (citylab). Looking at the facts presently a decade later helps to further Davis ' argument. For a long time, it was assumed that the larger the city was in terms of population, the larger the opportunity was there for its inhabitants. It has never been more apparent than today that that is no longer the case. Consequently, in just ten years, the world population has risen so greatly that half of the top ten world populations were replaced - yet the top GDPs have gone largely unchanged.

Urbanization and growth go with each other: no country has ever reached a great economy without a significant population shift into cities. According to United Nations databases, the proportion of the 2014 world population living in urban areas was 54 per cent, heading for 66 per cent by 2050. Urbanization is necessary to keep up growth in developing countries, and it yields other benefits as well. But it is not pain-less or always welcomed by policymakers or the general public. Managing urbanization is an important part of nurturing growth; neglecting cities—even in countries in which the level of urbanization is low—can impose heavy costs.

For several people, cities consider a universe of new opportunities, including employment (UNFPA, 2016). There is a powerful link between urbanization and economic growth (UNFPA, 2016). Throughout the world, towns and cities are responsible for above %80 of gross public goods (UNFPA, 2016). Over and over the excellent life is portrayed as a big private house and spacious green yard where children can play with the dog, and they have the advantage of large areas which the hard routine urban life cannot provide. However, the world turned to be a small village due to scientific and technological development which included all

For several people, cities consider a universe of new opportunities, including employment (UNFPA, 2016). There is a powerful link between urbanization and economic growth (UNFPA, 2016). Throughout the world, towns and cities are responsible for above %80 of gross public goods (UNFPA, 2016). Over and over the excellent life has been pictured as a big private house and spacious green yard where children can play with the dog, and they have the advantage of large areas which the hard routine urban life cannot provide. However, the world turned to be a small village due to scientific and technological development which included all