Analysis Of The Quartering Act

Soon the Quartering Act was passed, directing the colonies to provide quarters for British soldiers. Americans found this oppressive because it meant that soldiers were placed in colonial homes. In 1764 Parliament passed the Stamp Act, putting a duty on most printed materials. This was a normal tax for the British as it had been going on in Britain for a long time, and it made sense that the rest of their empire would pay the same tax. This placed a burden on merchants and the colonial elite who did most legal transactions and read the newspapers. Also passed in the same year was the Declaratory Act, which stated that the colonies were subject to the will of Parliament. This made a lot of sense to the British, as Parliament was their ruling body, but, to the colonies who had become used to their own government during the years of salutory neglect, this was a direct threat to their way of life.

As stated by Thomas Riggs “From the time the British soldiers arrived in Boston, animosity between the military and the town's citizens was evident. Soldiers broke into private shops and stole goods.” This shows how the British soldiers treated the colonists terribly and with disrespect. Along with the act that the colonists had to pay more taxes for goods. The colonists also had to feed, house, and put up with the soldier’s rudeness. This pushed the colonists to their limit and caused them to revolt. That is how the Quartering act and taxes from Parliament is partial to why the British are to blame.

The colonists are making too much of a big deal over nothing. For example the tea act which puts a tax on tea is fair for the colonists and even beneficial. For instance the price of tea has actually gone down instead of going up. And who cares if the East India Company has a monopoly over the industry. People in the colonies could always find a new job. Furthermore the declaratory act may even help the colonies since the great and powerful British parliament has full control of the colonies. Finally the reaction to the quartering act is completely inappropriate. Those soldiers fought their hardest to protect the colonies carry the colonists through battle. The least they can do is give them the respect and dignity that they rightfully deserve. There are around 10,000 soldiers in the colonies and they need a

On March 24, 1765, The British Parliament passed the Quartering Act which decided the dedication of the American leaders to outfit British troops with safe house and acquisitions. Despite the fact that there was some yearning to secure their far-away subjects, the expense of doing as such was measuring intensely on the saddled to-handle British open. Somebody needed to pay to bring home the veterans from the French-Indian War and furnish them with benefits. Authorities in Britain could see no motivation behind why that the American homesteaders ought not to tolerate the brunt of the expense. The British likewise settled a leading group of traditions chiefs, whose intention was to stop frontier sneaking and the uncontrolled debasement of neighborhood authorities who were frequently complicit in such unlawful exchange. The board was entirely successful, especially in Boston, its seat. As the blacklist spread, badgering of

Britain was back at it again, angering the colonists. Within the Intolerable Acts was the Quartering Acts, this meant any British soldier had the right to stay where he wanted when he wanted. Colonists had to serve whatever needs these men might have had without hesitation. This was a force of entry to the colonist. Another action within the Act was closing off the Boston Harbor because colonists refused to pay back what they owed for the Boston Tea Party. This really ticked off the colonists because they lost a lot of jobs. Britain took over the colonist’s greatest port and invaded their privacy, another reason to fight against

The British also felt that they could not afford to lose the vast amount of territory they had won for America during the war. So the British Government permanently stationed regular troops in the colonies to protect their interests. This resulted in the Quartering Act of 1765. This stipulated that British regular troops were to be lodged in public houses, inns, even empty homes if the barracks were overcrowded or unavailable. Furthermore, this lodging was to be at the expense of the local colonist authorities. The colonists did not see the need for the standing army as the war was already won. The reaction of the Reverend John Tucker of Boston

Once again, the colonists were angry that they were being taxed on basic needs. This anger only grew through the Boston Massacre incident, where five colonists were killed, and the Boston Tea Party, where enraged colonists dumped tea into the Boston Harbor. The last straw for the colonists seemed to be the passing of the Coercive Acts, otherwise known as the Intolerable Acts. These acts were created to regulate and basically restrict the colonists to make them realize that Parliament was in control. Colonists did not agree with this act, specifically the Quartering Act which required them to house British soldiers, as well as feed and clothe them. These acts and taxations, along with the violent incidents that occurred in Boston, and a lack of colonial representation in the Parliament caused the colonists to

The Quartering Act was proclaimed in 1765. The act allowed the British soldiers to live in colonist’s houses. It also allowed soldiers to eat and drink colonists’ food. The goal of the act was to keep the uprising of rebels at a low by catching them when the troops moved in, or by overhearing conversations.

Second, the Quartering Act of 1765 was an act which provided places and supplies for troops and soldiers. “The English passed the Quartering Act because it provided protection for the colonists”(Colonial Unrest). It frustrated the colonists because instead of protecting the colony the colonists felt like the troops were controlling them. Also, “It would make the colonies pay for some of the costs of having

King George reacted to the “Boston Tea Party” by imposing “the Intolerable Acts” A core and critical cause of the revolution. Some of “the Intolerable Acts” were as follows: First “the Boston Port Act” which stated that, a complete shutdown of the Boston port to a future time when the Dutch East India Company would’ve been

These acts then led to the long string of others given out by King. In 1765, Parliament passed the Quartering Act, which required colonists to provide barracks and supplies to British soldier and also the Stamp Act that required stamps to be placed on paper products such as playing cards, pamphlets, almanacs, and newspapers. Unlike the acts before it, the Stamp Act was a direct tax on the colonies and made many believe "the passage of it was not merely an impolitic and unjust law that threatened the priceless right of the individual to retain possession of his property until he or his chosen representative voluntarily gave it up to another; it was to many, also, a danger signal indicating that a more general threat existed" [3]

In response to the events of the Boston Tea Party, the British parliament passed a series of laws called the Intolerable (Coercive) Acts in 1774. These Acts were: the ‘Boston Port Act’, closing down all trade of Massachusetts; the ‘Massachusetts Government Act’, Massachusetts was no longer allowed to govern themselves; the ‘Administration of Justice Act’, any person charged with murder while trying to enforce the law would be tried in England; and the ‘Quartering Act’, allowing British troops to be housed in

By 1765, at a Stamp Act Congress, all but four colonies were represented as the “Declaration of Rights and Grievances” was passed. They were determined to let Parliament know that they were equal to British citizens, that there would be no “taxation without representation,” and all efforts to stop tax on colonists would continue (Kennedy, etal 2011.) Although Lord Rockingham, the predecessor of Grenville, sought to repeal of the Stamp Act, this in no way meant Parliament was conceding their control. In fact, while the Stamp Act was repealed, another called the “Declaratory Act of 1766,” gave Parliament the authority to make laws binding the American Colonies, “in all cases whatsoever.” In 1767, George III passed the Townshend Acts to collect tax on glass, lead, paints, paper and, tea. Recognizing that tea was a favorite among the Americans, it ensured greater revenue the British government. Again, the colonists’ rights for representation were ignored and they started to boycott British goods and ultimately, smuggle tea. When the Quartering Act was passed, which specified that colonists were to give room and board to British troops, tension began to rise. For two years, the colonists tolerated British troops on their soil and their dissatisfaction with the British Parliament and King George III became evident through many violent riots, abusiveness of tax collectors and destruction of property. According to Kennedy, etal (2011), Parliament, continually met with

The Quartering Acts were two British laws passed by the parliament of Great Britain in the years of 1765-1774. These acts were an extension to the Mutiny Acts. The Mutiny Acts were passed in 1686 after the Glorious Revolution had passed. The Quartering Acts were turned into one of the Intolerable Acts in 1774. The Intolerable Acts were passed after the Boston Tea Party. They were mainly created to make local colonial governments provide housing for the British soldiers staying in the thirteen colonies. The Quartering Acts were passed at the same time as the Stamp Act. Both of these acts were boycotted by groups such as the “Sons Of Liberty”. The Quartering Acts are eventually linked to the American

I think the act that angered the colonists the most is the Quartering Act. I think this because the soldiers could just live with whoever they want. Also the colonists have to give them food water and a bed. I think the act that angered the colonists the least was the sugar act. This being that even if the British taxed sugar there would still be smugglers for sugar that they wouldn’t stop. Also the colonists didn’t use sugar most of the time unless they were drinking tea and tea was taxed so some people don't buy it.