Analysis Of The Veldt Essay

Everyone that is living in the world we live in today are all making their best efforts to obtain that which we all want the most, happiness. Many individuals will pursue that happiness, while others manage to compromise that happiness. Everyone has their own methods at trying to achieve happiness, but sometimes they just cannot pursue it and when they realize that what they want, they cannot have. Their happiness will become compromised. When at the same time some individuals can pursue that happiness and achieve what they truly want in life. Other times those who pursue their happiness, end up compromising their happiness in the process. The image “New York, ca. 1962” can be shown to prove what an

In a society where the concept of ‘self’ is removed and ‘selflessness’ is the moral good, the pursuit and attainment of personal happiness is evil. Individuals seeking happiness live a tortured existence; filled with persecution and guilt. “We, Equality 7-2521, were not happy in those years in the Home of the Students. It was not that the learning was too hard for us. It was that the learning was too easy. This is a great sin, to be born with a head which is too quick. It is not good to be different from our brothers, but it is evil to be superior to them. The Teachers told us so, and they frowned when they looked upon us.” (Rand 4) Equality 7-2521 struggles with the fact that he has attributes that set him aside from the rest of the collective. In a society of equals, there

Mankind must by this time have acquired positive beliefs as to the effects of some actions on their happiness; and the beliefs which have thus come down are the rules of morality for the multitude, and for the philosopher until he has succeeded in finding better. That philosophers might easily do this, even now, on many subjects; that the received code of ethics is by no means of divine right; and that mankind have still much to learn as to the effects of actions on general happiness, I admit or rather earnestly maintain.

In life people seek prosperity. Humans have been trained to always want more, never satisfied with what they have. Whether someone does everything in their power to achieve a promotion, or someone tries to become rich. The previous example shows selfishness and that people will do whatever it takes to achieve these goals, whether an asset to society, or a downfall. In the Renaissance tragedy, Macbeth, Shakespeare reveals how people’s greediness and feeling entitlement to prosperity causes their own self-destruction.

Individuals are often faced with many situations in their life where self-interest forces them to pursue their happiness when nobody empathizes with them when they need it. In the picture, by David S. Waltz, a girl is standing alone and she is separating herself from the crowd in order to pursue her self-interests and happiness. The girls in the back are laughing at her and they don’t empathize with her because they don’t know her past. Furthermore, it can be inferred that the future of the girl (standing alone) is about change and happiness is about to arrive into her life. David S. Waltz develops the idea that when people don’t empathize with the individuals, they pursue their self-interests in order to achieve success and happiness.

The greatest happiness principle doesn’t have meaning unless each person’s happiness is valued exactly

In contrast, the conception of happiness in Indian culture is a combination of both individualist and collectivist viewpoints. From the individualistic viewpoint of happiness in Indian culture, an individual has the power to pursue their own happiness and do whatever they deem conducive to their well-being. According to Kumar (2003), it is believed in Indian culture that “man should do whatever is possible to enhance pleasure and avoid pain . . . one could beg, borrow or steal or even murder . . .” (p. 2). In simple terms, one should do whatever is in their power to achieve ultimate happiness. This is an individualistic viewpoint because the Indian culture trusts an individual to make decisions that will benefit them. In a

For example, you are good person and you make good relationship with best friends, great neighbors, then we can see an objective diagnosis of happiness, satisfaction ,and spiritual development, with can bring happiness. However, happy outside could not survive long time, but if we have happiness inside our hearts, our souls, so we could find happiness everywhere, even under the most difficult situations. In other words, material sometimes solve the problems but can create a hassle. For instance, some people are rich, have a good education, and they have been working on high social positions, but happiness stays away from their lives. Such as, they use drugs or alcohol or sometimes they are not satisfied and happy. On the contrary, some people have less money, but they enjoy more happy and they slept well at night. Even for the poor in the physical sense, they are satisfied and happy. This shows the powerful impact of a good mental attitude. " Material will not be able to solve the entire problem of suffering humanity " the Dalai Lama said

If, even with man’s best effort, nothing is achieved, any process of good will must be regarded as such (394). This marks a definite shift in philosophical thought; the consideration of good without any remark on the consequences of one’s actions and thoughts. Kant does not emphasize the creation of happiness as the goal of one’s choices, since happiness is a subjective marker open to corruption (396). Multiple actions can produce this result, while the same action can differ in its consequences. This uncertainty necessitates a different, more concrete definition of moral value.

For example, happiness is subjective and at times. According to Dan Haybron, “Even as happiness might fail to suffice for well-being, well-being itself may be only one component of a good life, and not the most important one at that. Here ‘good life’ means a life that is good all things considered, taking account of all the values that matter in life, whether they benefit the individual or not (Haybron).” Perhaps a person has to consider morality before their own happiness, but at the end of their life, they had a good life. An example of an act that a person has to consider morality before their own happiness is the matter of divorce. They may have children, and children are greatly impacted when their parents’ divorce. The person who wants the divorce cannot consider just their own unhappiness and leave their family, but has to find a different way to be happy with their own life. Self-biased happiness is not a good reason to plug into the machine.

In this world everyone is selfish for somethings, even though in the positive reinforcement.People do have two sides the darkest and the brightest, people show their darkest side when they lose their self-esteem, everything seem unhappy to them they convince themselves that they do not have any value in this world and nobody cares anymore they all alone even though they start neglecting surrounding happiness. Those who have brightest side those who know how to seek happiness, give value to others and take positive outcomes. “Just as treasures are uncovered from the earth, so virtue appears from good deeds, and wisdom appears from a pure and peaceful mind”(Buddha). It explain that you need to focus on your goals that how your real personality, be calm to get positive outcome and the happiness will be appear in your way.

Happiness is one of the strongest emotions we have as humans. However, it is also one of the biggest deceptions we face. As David Brooks states, “Happiness wants you to think about maximizing your benefits. Difficulty and suffering sends you on a different route” (567). Happiness can lead to greediness and games played on the mind. As Americans, we are fortunate for many modern day conveniences, however, these conveniences create a sense of greed that we do not notice. These modern conveniences births a need for instant satisfaction to be happy. An article by International Pathwork Foundation quotes, “Only if I can have what I want, the way I want it, and when I want it, can I have happiness”.

Each individual determines what kind of conduct is acceptable through societal conditioning achieved through personal experience. This very personalized path demonstrates that there is no true way to happiness that is the same for each individual.

Motivation to satisfy one inclination and achieve happiness in the present can outweigh consideration of a later (i.e., more distant temporally) consequence. Abiding by one’s duty to achieve happiness provides moral value.

Prior to reading this short story many readers might agree that the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people is a positive thing. As when the majority of people are happy, the chances of confrontation are lowered. However, when the situation that determines happiness is a great deal, it is no longer acceptable to ensure that the majority is happy, but every individual is content. Author Ursula LeGuin has provided readers with a compelling short story that encompasses many philosophical viewpoints. She challenges her readers to define moral ethics through the harsh and critical conditions that her characters face.