Analysis Of Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Day in and day out college athletes work endlessly in practice, school and work without any type of reward. Over the past couple of decades universities have attempted to get the NCAA to allow these universities to give student athletes some type of money for their work and dedication. In John Nocera’s NY Times article, “A Way to Start Paying College Athletes,” he uses strong logical reasoning and credible sources to effectively educate his audience. However, he drastically changes his tone when discussing certain ideas, by indirectly calling out those who do not believe in his way of paying college athletes.

The NCAA brings in millions of dollars annually and the student athletes do not get a dime out of it. Recent literature has focused on the issue of compensating college athletes. This researcher found articles and statements that led to belief some coaches and people do think college athletes should be compensated for their efforts. The researcher wanted to find reasons why critics and non supporters believe college athletes should not be paid, also to find reasoning behind those that do support. This researcher believes it is unfair to exploit these college players, and to not include them in the profits they cause.

How have sports changed to the point where there is serious discussion around paying college athletes? Universities and athletic coaches make millions on the backs of their players. So the question is, are our college athletes properly compensated? After reading both articles by Paul Marx and Warren Hartenstine I have come to the conclusion that college athletes should not be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Many students are fully compensated for tuition, room and board, books and private tutors. These services are valuable in countless ways. They allow students to pursue both their athletic and academic dreams. Further compensating college athletes would lead to an unfair advantage and is unjust to other students.

There has been a lot of talk and many articles and hours upon hours of debates going on on sportscenter and just simply among common people about whether or not college athletes should be paid. College athletes shouldn’t be paid with all of the benefits they already have and there is some evidence as to of why they should be paid but it’s not enough. A ton of evidence has been shown for why college athletes shouldn’t be paid such as scholarships, the amount of money the college is making off of sports, etc. and much detail that goes into it throughout the essay. College athletes should not be paid because of all the benefits they already get as it is they really don’t need more benefits stacked on top of what they already

Abstract:  Collegiate athletes participating in the two revenue sports (football, men's basketball) sacrifice their time, education, and risk physical harm for their respected programs. The players are controlled by a governing body (NCAA) that dictates when they can show up to work, and when they cannot show up for work. They are restricted from making any substantial financial gains outside of their sports arena. These athletes receive no compensation for their efforts, while others prosper from their abilities. The athletes participating in the two revenue sports of college athletics, football and men's basketball should be compensated for their time, dedication, and work put forth in their respected sports.

One of the uttermost common controversial topics in our world today is whether or not college student athletes should receive compensation for their athletic abilities. This has been a topic of discussion for many years now, and the topic seems to become more and more relevant as our world evolves. Before choosing a stance, there are a few questions that are necessary to be answered. Should all student athletes receive compensation? What determines the amount each student athlete receives? Will all student athletes receive equal compensation or will the student athletes who participate in the programs that generate the greatest amount of revenue be paid more? If the student athletes do begin to receive compensation, can they gain more for

One argument supporting the payment of college athletes is that colleges bring in millions of dollars every year, yet the athletes see none of the money (Ford). People who support this argument say that these players work tirelessly throughout the season to win championships which then help the college receive money, and then the players receive no payment for their work. Kenneth Cooper, the author of Should College Athletes Be Paid? quoted Robert McCormick, an attorney for the National Labor Relations Board. McCormick argues that “there are more demands put on these young men than any employee of the university. They are laboring under very strict and arduous conditions, so

The question of whether or not college athletes should get paid is of heated debate in todays times. While many believe that student athletes are entitled to income, It remains undougtibly a concern of moral interest to universities across the country. This paper is going to explain the pros and cons that come with allowing student athletes the right to receive a salary.

Research paper For my research paper, I will discuss the following topic of should college athletes be paid. I believe this is a very interesting topic that several sports enthusiast and fans would love to figure out. This essay will be very intriguing to anyone who enjoys sports and college athletes and maybe it could even be them in the future? I love sports

In recent years mixed feeling have been discussed over college student athletes getting paid. Some feel that players should be rewarded for the huge amount of revenue generated on behalf of their play. Especially when coaches are receiving huge multi million dollar contracts. Currently, NCAA rules do not allow players to receive any compensation. The non-fiction article, “Should College Player get Paid?”, written by Michael Gonchar, explains how NCAA classifies Division I football players as amateurs, not professionals, student-athletes, not employees, which is how colleges get away with paying them nothing. With respect to how hard and how much time college athletes put in, college football players should not get paid due to scholarships, playing is a privilege not a job, and money allocation . They should how ever be compensated, such as

In addition, paying college athletes will result in greed so it is best to not pay them. Athletes are motivated to play and try their best in each game to earn scholarships. If NCAA start paying them then it will

The article is directly related to the topic concerning financial compensation for student athletes across the United States. In the article, “Paying College Athletes”, the main topics that are discussed mainly include the debate of whether college athletes should be compensated by their respective institutions, insights involving the value of the scholarships these athletes receive, court actions that attempted to force

College athletics today are enormous compared to the size that it was many years ago, especially in the region that I live in which is SEC country, should student athletes that have contributed to this growth be compensated for their contributions or not. With many big television deals and high ticket pricing this has been a topic that has become a constant in the minds of many. This topic is beginning to gather legs and making a move to the forefront of the NCAA to have to face with the recent decision by Northwestern to vote on unionization. This research will provide many aspects that will show ideas that may have or may not have been thought of as far as what athlete receive today as well as what

College sports are one of the largest and fastest growing markets in today’s culture. With some college sports games attracting more viewers than their professional counterparts, the NCAA is one of the most profiting organizations in America. Recently there has been controversy in the world of college sports as to whether the college athletes that are making their universities and the NCAA money should receive payment while they are playing their respective sport. Many believe that these athletes should be paid. Others argue that they are already receiving numerous benefits for playing that sport from their universities. Many of the proponents of paying college athletes are current or former college athletes who believe their hard work and hours put into practice and competing go under appreciated. They feel that while the athletes are making the university money, the athletes do not receive any cut of these profits. Opponents feel that athletes already receive numerous perks and should not receive extra compensation on top of the perks they already receive.

Founded almost a century ago to protect students engaging in college athletics, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has been at the forefront in the implementation of its founding principles which largely focus on both academics and athletics excellence (National Collegiate Athletic Association). However, a review of the total earnings made by NCAA and the benefits accorded to the players that make these earnings realizable brings to question whether NCAA truly protects and cares about the livelihood of athletes. In this text, I revisit the issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid. In my opinion, there exists a need to compensate college athletes.