Analysis On Why College Athletes Should Get Paid

The authors begin the article discussing the creation of the NCAA and how they came to the creation of their amateurism laws, providing a background to as to why college athletes are not allowed to receive any form of monetary payment. Johnson and Acquaviva then present five arguments as to why college athletes should not be compensated. These arguments are that athletes are being paid with their education, new issues would arise with fair pay if college athletes were compensated, college athletes are receiving more than just an education, paying college athletes would eliminate competition, and that college athletes already know what to expect when they sign to play for a university. The authors then provide counter arguments that help to prove that college athletes should be paid for their play. These are that the cost of living is not covered in college scholarships, college athletes don’t understand that they will be set aside if they are injured or benched, and college athletes do not receive more than an education due to their full schedules. The authors then explain some of the plans that could help to fairly compensate college athletes, such as allowing them to receive endorsement deals. Finally, Johnson and

In conclusion, college athletes deserve to be paid for what they do. College athletes are dedicated to their sports. They are doing this to make a living, also to get an education. They have wants and needs. They deserve to be

College athletes are taken advantage of on a daily basis. Student athletes have to spend all day in class having to meet vigorous academic requirements well also having to stay competitive in sports. For doing so much you think the NCAA would at least give them some money to live off. When students have no money they are more likely to sell their autographs or take money from boosters. When students accept money from boosters it not only affects the player but it affects the team. Some ways that it affects the whole team is by reducing the amount of scholarships a team can give out that year. It could also affect their college playoff hopes by not allowing them to participate in their college bowl games.

College athletes should be paid monetarily as well as with scholarships. Colleges are benefiting of big time players by selling their jerseys without their names on it to avoid paying the athletes but the NCAA looked silly “when Jay Bilas, a veteran ESPN analyst, former Duke basketball player and vocal critic of the NCAA, took to Twitter to point out that although schools cannot sell a player's jersey with his name on the back, if you typed Manziel into a search box on ShopNCAASports.com a No. 2 Texas A&M jersey pops up, available for up to $64.95. (Manziel wears No. 2.) (Davis).”Since college athletes can not get sponsorships their name can’t be on the jerseys that are sold to the fans even though you could still find their jersey by looking

Most institutions absorb significant losses each year in order to provide their student-athletes a venue to participate and compete in the sports that they love as they progress toward their ultimate goals of obtaining their college degrees. We should not take this sacrifice by our colleges and universities for granted. Proponents of paying college athletes present their own arguments for their position. Their arguments focus primarily on the monetary aspects of this “business” (United States Sports

How have sports changed to the point where there is serious discussion around paying college athletes? Universities and athletic coaches make millions on the backs of their players. So the question is, are our college athletes properly compensated? After reading both articles by Paul Marx and Warren Hartenstine I have come to the conclusion that college athletes should not be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Many students are fully compensated for tuition, room and board, books and private tutors. These services are valuable in countless ways. They allow students to pursue both their athletic and academic dreams. Further compensating college athletes would lead to an unfair advantage and is unjust to other students.

A very long debate in college sports is if the athletes should be paid. Author Jared Walch, talks about both sides of the issue, but later in the article it seems he sides with the argument that they should be paid. In the beginning of the article, he talks about why the athletes shouldn’t be paid. Walch first argues that this is all a choice for the athletes. They choose to put themselves in harms way of possible injury and not every athlete gets injured. Another argument that the author discusses is how to pay the athletes. Who pays the athletes and how do you distribute the money? The two programs to bring in the most money are football and men’s basketball. Women’s golf athletes are still college athletes. So even though they don’t make as much money, will they still be paid? Most athletes are already at school for scholarships. If you already have everything paid for by the university, what more would you need paid for? The author later goes into the morality and how paying the athletes would take away some of the entertainment of watching college athletes play. Towards the end of his article, Walch

Here are some statements from former players and officials on college athletes getting paid. These are some current players commenting on if college athletes should be paid or not. Current Seattle Seahawks cornerback (Richard Sherman) makes a big statement and impact on this argument. He says “No, I don’t think college athletes are given enough time to really take advantage of the free education that they’re given, and it’s frustrating because a lot of people get upset with student-athletes and say they’re not focused on school and they’re not taking advantage of the opportunity they’re given. They should get paid. I would love for a regular student to have a student-athlete’s schedule during the season for just one quarter or one semester and show me

Another major argument used to support paying college athletes is to say college athletics is a large business. Supporters say that college athletes should be paid because the extremely large organization known as the NCAA is making lucrative amounts of money off of them, and what they do is considered a business (Frederick, 2013). They argue that the extreme amounts of money the NCAA earns from these athletes is too much, and that they can afford to compensate the athletes for the large amount of money they generate. College athletes sign a letter of intent to play for a specific university knowing that the school will generate large amounts of money off of their appearance, and performance. If college athletes do not agree with the fact that universities and the NCAA will make large sums of money from them they should not play

The American dream of making a living in sports at both the collegiate and professional level grows each year. The youth of today’s society strive to join the ranks of the professional athletes they worship, and college is the beginning of that dream. Over the past few decades, college athletics have gained immense popularity across universities in the United States. Intercollegiate sports bring in a surplus of revenue to their respective universities as well as build a reputation for the college. Athletes attending Division I sports go to their particular schools in hopes of fulfilling their dream of making it professionally. There is a long-debated argument on whether college athletes at the Division I level should be paid to attend school

College Athletes should be paid because billions of dollars are being made each year. Universities’ make most of their income from the Athletic Department. When the student enters college as an athlete, his or her role as a player become their job and lifestyle. The athletes receive scholarships, but that is still not normally enough base on each person personal need. College athletes are not allowed to work. Who will pay for all the necessary expenses if they come from poor families? College athletes make the school millions of dollars through merchandise and games. Most of the athletes that can leave school and turn professional do so, because most college athletes come from poverty.

“I’ve been writing about this issue for several years now calling for college athletes to be paid the wages that they deserve and am sad to acknowledge that very little has changed since I was a college athlete at UCLA, so poor that I and most of my teammates could barely scrape by. But just as with every injustice, wrongs don’t get righted unless we keep raising our voices again and again. So, once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more” (Kareem Abdul Jabbar Guardian Par 2). They fail to acknowledge how much our college athletes work and how we fail to even give them a single cent for how hard they work for their respective schools. The Guardian talks to Kareem Abdul Jabbar about his views on the recent controversy about how the schools

Division 1 sports have increased monstrously among Americans in the course of recent decades. Division 1 college athletes should be paid because players are giving up their bodies for their school, it will keep more players in school, and to ensure an equal distribution of the revenue that the players bring to the school. This has expanded incomes for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the participating universities which has fueled the level headed discussion of whether school competitors ought to be paid past their athletic grants. In the course of recent decades, Division 1 sports have increased tremendously in the United States. Regardless of whether it be football, basketball, or hockey, etc. as far back as the start of the century, college athletics have gotten an overflow of income to their separate universities, and additionally enhancing the college's notoriety. For instance, in a review led by the Orlando Sentinel, it was evaluated that the University of Texas' Athletic Program had the most astounding income of some other University at

Paying college athletes is a fantastic idea because it helps the players out with their education and debts after college. If college athletes get paid for athletics, the debt rate for college students will go down significantly. For many college athletes paying them for athletics is one more incentive for trying in school. “The culprit is payments to players, an idea that’s astonishingly overdue. Starting next year, schools from the “Power Five” athletic conferences—the Atlantic Coast Conference, the Big Ten, the Big 12, the Pac-12, and the Southeastern Conference—will start offering their players stipends. These allowances will be worth up to 10 percent of the cost of attending those schools, to

Many highly recruited athletes would stay in college if they had the money to support their families. For example, number one draft pick Jadeveon Clowney said, ‘’ If I would have had the chance to take care of my family through college, I would have probably stayed in college.’’ he also said, ‘’ they are selling our jerseys with our numbers and making money off of tickets sales, so I think college athletes should get paid.’’ If so many of these high recruited athletes got paid they would stay in college. This would make each team better, which would increase the competitiveness on the