Analysis: Should College Athletes Be Paid

College athletes should receive some sort of payment for playing for their college. Many people believe that college athletes should be paid financially, because they are considered to be taken advantage of by the NCAA and most other school systems, because they should receive pay. Most college athletes are the main reason for huge profits from many merchandise sales; live events such as the game itself, and media and live coverage also provide sales increases. Differently from the professional sports, the athletes don’t get any type of cut. College teams may not have the same national expectations as the professional ones, but they are just as important, if not, even more important than professional athletes. Millions of dollars of merchandise,

If they got a scholarship their school is already paid for saving them a lot of money; (http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-college-athletes-be-paid) they should only be paid for autographs. college Athletes receive plenty of other gratuities. "In my opinion, college athletes do not deserve to be paid for playing sports. They receive lots of money in scholarships and don't have to pay anything for college. There is no doubt that these athletes do wonders in monetary numbers for their schools, but if they were to be paid, then they would have to pay the kids that walk on to the team as well." (http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-college-athletes-be-paid)

Athletes spend more than 40 hours a week practicing, leaving little time to keep up with academic commitments. For NCAA executives, administrators and support staff who start feeling the burn around hour 42, they should remember that their student-athletes’ jobs are not only intellectually demanding but brings them to the limits of their physical endurance as well. If this situation was on any other job, it would take the world by its throat. College is when students look for their first to support them for four, or more, long years. On top of working for that long, they travel across the country almost twice a week. That takes a lot of strength off your body and to replenish their energy they constantly need proper meals. A 250 pound, 6 foot football player is not going to live off ramen for their health and to stay fit to perform at their fullest capability for the school to

Why should they not be paid if the NCAA has almost 1 billion dollars to pay. “Today reported that the NCAA’s revenue in fiscal 2014 was $989 million”. It is one of the biggest companies for college football. I think that they could pay college athletes. TheNewYorker agrees with me with “the highest-revenue sports—football and basketball—the argument in favor of paying players is so searingly obvious as to seem undeniable”. It is undeniable because it is the truth that college athletes are doing work without any reward. College athletes should be paid with scholarships.

A very long debate in college sports is if the athletes should be paid. Author Jared Walch, talks about both sides of the issue, but later in the article it seems he sides with the argument that they should be paid. In the beginning of the article, he talks about why the athletes shouldn’t be paid. Walch first argues that this is all a choice for the athletes. They choose to put themselves in harms way of possible injury and not every athlete gets injured. Another argument that the author discusses is how to pay the athletes. Who pays the athletes and how do you distribute the money? The two programs to bring in the most money are football and men’s basketball. Women’s golf athletes are still college athletes. So even though they don’t make as much money, will they still be paid? Most athletes are already at school for scholarships. If you already have everything paid for by the university, what more would you need paid for? The author later goes into the morality and how paying the athletes would take away some of the entertainment of watching college athletes play. Towards the end of his article, Walch

In order to justify the compensation of college athletes we must look at the current programs in place. Right now college athletes are spoon-fed an education, giving them a distinct advantage over other students. Universities provide them with free private tutors and review sessions to help further compensate for their time on

Why should college athletes be paid? For many people, “pay for play” is a controversial topic. Joe Nocera of the New York Times and Scott Martelle of the Los Angeles Times discuss in the following articles. Nocera wrote an article called “A Way to Start Paying College Athletes.” In the articles he explains both sides of the argument and gives a way to fix the problem. Martelle wrote “Top Tier College Athletes Are Professionals Who Deserve a Bigger Slice of The Pie.” In it he argues his side of the topic. Both of the pieces are trade articles that were published online on their respective company’s site. Nocera’s article is better than Martelle’s because he has better supporting facts and the information is more relevant to my topic.

Another major argument used to support paying college athletes is to say college athletics is a large business. Supporters say that college athletes should be paid because the extremely large organization known as the NCAA is making lucrative amounts of money off of them, and what they do is considered a business (Frederick, 2013). They argue that the extreme amounts of money the NCAA earns from these athletes is too much, and that they can afford to compensate the athletes for the large amount of money they generate. College athletes sign a letter of intent to play for a specific university knowing that the school will generate large amounts of money off of their appearance, and performance. If college athletes do not agree with the fact that universities and the NCAA will make large sums of money from them they should not play

The NCAA brings in 11 billion dollars a year in revenue just from their college athletes. That $11 billion dollars alone is more than the annual revenue of both the NBA and the NHL. For example, The University Of Alabama brought in 143.3 million dollars in athletic revenue alone. That annual figure is not only more than any team in the NHL, but it is also more than 25 of the 30 teams in the NBA. Somehow people still think that with that amount of money being brought in yearly that college athletes don’t have the right to be paid. However, college athletes should be paid for the revenue they generate for the universities.

College athletes demonstrate a high quality of balance, between school work, work they put on the field, and managing a personal life as well. Athletic scholars are people who work as hard or if not harder than an average american works in his/her profession and should be paid for it! My view on this topic is that if you truly work in the classroom, have the grades, work on the field and show that you deserve to represent the university in which you’re attending, then you deserve a share of the money collected from the multi billion dollar association the NCAA. Most athletes that earn a scholarship get about 25,000 dollars a year. According to Forbes athletes are given about 7 dollars for a meal when traveling and anything more given is

Throughout my high school athletic career, playing both football and running cross country, i’ve witnessed multiple teammates of mine receive scholarships to continue their athletic and academic careers at a university. However due to the disproportionate number of hours spent on the sport rather than academics without receiving compensation is causing many high school athletes to turn down athletic scholarships and instead begin to focus on their academic futures.

College athletes should be paid because they bring in millions of dollars for their respected colleges every year. College athletes perform in front of millions of people. Colleges sell athletes jerseys or other merchandise of a player. College athletes put in hours upon hours of work on and off the field but they don't get anything for it. These are the reasons college athletes should be paid.

Picture yourself in a scenario where you, a college athlete playing your favorite sport, score the game winning points in the championship in front of thousands of fans in the stands and millions more watching at home. You’re the hero of the night and you are loved and adored by everyone. You go back to college the next day with little to no food and barely enough money for your basic needs. Division I athletes should be paid for playing college sports. Division I athletes should be compensated for playing sports because they are no longer amateurs in their sport, they are generating billions of dollars in revenue for their college and the NCAA organization, and they are being used for branding and advertisement.

As Scoop Jackson stated, “There is no system of payment that can be put in place that is fair across the board to all students, al sports, and all schools that participate in college athletics” (1). At this point, people should be viewing colleges and universities that make money off of the backs, performances, and success of major football and men’s basketball programs and the scholarship athletes who play them as a business. College athletics are essentially a business, if a person takes away the university/college “label” associated with college football. College football would essentially turn into the NFL. As for any other college sports, the professional equivalent of that sport comes up as the answer. For example, every college athlete knows that when they sign the letter of intent to accept the scholarship, the school’s would take make the most money off of his or her efforts. It’s not different than a professional athlete signing a contract. Furthermore, people need to realize that college is a business platform. It is a business that will offer athletes the chance to get an education in college and build their image in their respected

There has been amplified debate on the treatment, education, training of the college athlete. To avoid exploitation of athletes, “The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), formed in 1905, set bylaws requiring college student-athletes to be amateurs in order to be eligible for intercollegiate athletics competition” (Schneider n.p.). Intercollegiate athletics have dramatically changed over the last several decades. Currently, intercollegiate athletics generate tremendous amounts of revenue, remarkably in football and basketball. College sports in America is a