Analysis: Should College Athletes Be Paid

College sports have a big market on the major school levels. These major schools can bring in 30 to 40 million dollars per year to the school through the athletic programs. The players get none of this share of money even though they are the ones who have to put themselves at risk during these tough games that provide the school profit. You may say that these college athletes are getting a free education at their choice of university but some many say they should get paid. Today as much money that runs in and out of these schools there is a huge controversy to whether or not these student athletes should get rewarded for their hard work on and off the

Do you want to get paid for playing a sport in college? (http://www.experienceproject.com/question-answer.php) College players should receive some payment for playing for their schools. College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play, paying college athletes would help to begin creating a sense of financial awareness, (https://smartasset.com/retirement/should-student-athletes-be-paid ) and some athletes don't have enough money to pay for food or stuff they need and with the money they have left over they can buy things.

But why should a student athlete be paid in the first place? Their just athletes right? They go to school just like everyone else? What makes them so special? What makes a college athlete different than the average student is the amount of revenue that they help bring to their selected colleges. This type of revenue is made up from ticket sales, merchandise, media rights and contributions. “USA today” reported that the University of Texas generated $167.7 million dollars from their athletic programs, and that’s just one school. With this in mind, imagine just how much money other colleges are making from their athletics. Sure one can make the argument that they should not be paid because they are not professionals, but one can’t ignore the fact that they are bringing in millions of dollars and seeing none of it.

Before, college athletics was a stepping stone towards the athletes professional future. Now in the 21st century, it is a lucrative business. D-I college athletics is the majority of income for major universities. They collect money from ticket sales, merchandise, T.V. contracts, etc. The athletes, however, receive a scholarship and not much more. Even though receiving a college education is something most people would not complain about, when these athletes practice longer than the average American work week and don 't receive money to sustain themselves, it is time for a change. Athletes dedicate their lives to a sport and train hard to make it big. There has been a lot of controversy whether or not student athletes should be paid, and

During the last several years, there has been a concern regarding paying college athletes. On “5 Reasons Why NCAA Athletes Should Be Paid,” Dominic Alessi explains that college athletes needed an organization to make regulation and rules for them instead of them policing themselves. It led to the operation of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Now, it helps support the universities by bringing in billions of dollars per year. However, the NCAA did not allow college athletes to be paid because from the NCAA’s point of view, students are amateurs. There specific reasons Alessi gives for paying college athletes are they spent most of their time at practice; during reason, they are out of class too often; and they are employees of NCAA.

College athletes are taken advantage of on a daily basis. Student athletes have to spend all day in class having to meet vigorous academic requirements well also having to stay competitive in sports. For doing so much you think the NCAA would at least give them some money to live off. When students have no money they are more likely to sell their autographs or take money from boosters. When students accept money from boosters it not only affects the player but it affects the team. Some ways that it affects the whole team is by reducing the amount of scholarships a team can give out that year. It could also affect their college playoff hopes by not allowing them to participate in their college bowl games.

The issue of whether college athletes should be paid is a topic that has been long debated, from the very inception of college sports in the 1920s. The NCAA considers college athletes to be amateur athletes and not professionals, this means that they should only be playing for the love of sport and not anything else. The dictionary definition of an amateur is “one who engages in a pursuit, study, science, or sport as a pastime rather than as a profession” (Merriam-Webster). College athletes are supposed to make education their number one priority, with sports being a past time for them. In the real world, ranking an athlete’s priorities can get very difficult, an NLRB probe ruled that:

There has always been a big controversial debate on whether college athletes should receive some type of compensation for playing Division one sports. Many college teams pile up huge revenue from football games, basketball games, and many other different sports. Although the university piles up huge amounts of that money, not one penny goes towards any of the athletes. Even though they’re the reason why universities are getting rich from all the money the sports have obtained, the revenue that usually comes from game tickets, sponsorships, and booster clubs. Also college athletics have a huge popularity among Americans over the past few years, more American have turned their heads to watching collegiate sports rather than watching professional sports, to the fact that its way more exciting. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the other colleges that’s participating with this, in this case the debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Student athletes have worked hard, have dedicated themselves to the sport and also sacrificed their own time for the sport they love.

If college athletes were to get paid for playing sports then where would that leave their education? Their education would go down the drain because they could care less about school work as long as they are getting paid to play a sport. Student comes first in student-athlete. If a college athlete does not succeed in sports then they would need a skill to fall back on. Not all students will make it to the pros. Students are not professional athletes. Their sports included with their education can possibly be an avenue for them to get to the pros where they then can be paid. College sports are not careers or professions at that point in time. Their education should be first and foremost in their game plan. Worrying about money can distract them from their concentration on their academics which will pay long term dividends. Many college coaches emphasize the importance of education first. Parents and students are paying for a good education preparing for a profitable future. Sports pros don’t and cant guarantee how long their run will last. Then the money is gone especially if they don’t plan ahead.

Whether or not college athletes should be paid is a topic that is much debated recently. Some athletes even want to form unions so they can have the rights to complain about working conditions and their pay, or lack of pay. While some people believe college athletes should be paid, it would be a grave mistake to pay college athletes. Athletes play when they’re just little kids with a dream and it is their job to make that dream come true. They do this by being the best they can, by vigorously training almost every day. They play through middle school and through high school so they can ultimately show their talents and get into great intellectual and athletic schools. You should graduate in whatever field of school you are interested in. that is their duty to themselves, they work to get the pay checks later on in life. If I paid an elementary school student to play for me they wouldn’t want to go to high school, and if I paid a high school student they wouldn’t want to go to college, if I paid a college student to play for me they wouldn’t want to go and become a professional.

College athletes should not get paid. College athletes getting paid has a lot to do with most of the coaches being involved and letting them get paid. Most coaches get paid millions of dollars and most of the time that’s who the college players or their families are getting the money. Athletes wonder about getting money and how they are a going to get it. Well here is why college coaches make money off the player. The players are the ones who are really the reason why most coaches get paid the largest amount that they get. How good the player plays, their popularity etc. Coaches start off recruiting with a salary instead of a scholarship. But salary does not give a better deal than a scholarship.

Have you ever done a job that you didn't get paid for? This is exactly what college athletes go through. They play their sport and bring thing the university millions in revenue but don't receive a dime. Although college athletes receive full scholarships, they should be paid because if it wasn't for them the university wouldn't make any money, so the people generating it should receive a portion.

How would you feel if you worked vigorously every week for 60 hours and ended up with no paycheck? College athletes should be paid because the universities, colleges, apparel companies, T.V networks and athletic conferences they are playing for are making millions of dollars and the players get very little of that money. Also playing a college sport is like a full time job and athletes do not have time to make money to pay for a sufficient day-to-day life. Finally paying college athletes will decrease the number of student-athletes accepting illegal payments to get by in their daily life. Colleges, universities,, T.V networks, shoe companies and athletic conferences are making millions of dollars and players get very little of that money.

College athletes are spending a significant amount of time working hard on a sport, however they are not getting enough credit. College coaches get paid the most, even more than some of the coaches from professional sports. Some athletes feel they need to excel more in the sport than in the classroom, which could jeopardize their future. Also, there are multiple other costs student-athletes need to pay for, but it is hard for them to have a source of income. Student-athletes should be paid for playing at the collegiate level, because they would focus more on academic studies, have an easier time paying for extra costs, and the colleges earn enough money from the NCAA and the sports in general that some of the profits could be rewarded to the players.

When the topic of college comes up, many things come to mind. Those are the glory days for most of us. The college parties, the struggle to find a balance between having fun and maintaining a good GPA, and not to mention the amazing athletic departments that colleges offer. Everyone enjoys sports but does anyone ever stop to wonder how much goes into the preparation for those games? There’s much more effort that’s put into it other than just showing up for practice. It’s definitely a lot more work than your average college student which is why the question of whether or not college athletes should get paid comes up. Football alone brings in millions of dollars a year; and with all of that money floating around, it comes as a surprise that the athletes that put in the work are receiving nothing. Many people think that a scholarship at a high end university is more than enough compensation for playing a simple sport.