Analysis: Should College Athletes Get Paid

College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every

But why should a student athlete be paid in the first place? Their just athletes right? They go to school just like everyone else? What makes them so special? What makes a college athlete different than the average student is the amount of revenue that they help bring to their selected colleges. This type of revenue is made up from ticket sales, merchandise, media rights and contributions. “USA today” reported that the University of Texas generated $167.7 million dollars from their athletic programs, and that’s just one school. With this in mind, imagine just how much money other colleges are making from their athletics. Sure one can make the argument that they should not be paid because they are not professionals, but one can’t ignore the fact that they are bringing in millions of dollars and seeing none of it.

For years now there have been the argument if college athletes should be paid to play or not. It is an ongoing debate between many people including the National Collegiate Athletic Association(NCAA), athletes, coach, and other various people. The has debate has gone far enough that a lawsuit has started over it. There are many arguments for college athletes being paid such as; the athletes do not have time to work, their images are being used without any type of pay, and how the NCAA and coaches make millions of dollars off of the players while the players do not make anything. On the flip side of this, arguments that the athletes should not be paid include; they get paid in other varies ways, the average college athletic department loses enough money already without paying the athletes, and the fact that not all college athletes are in school to become professional athletes anyhow so making money from their athletic abilities should not be an issue for them at all.

Student athletes should not be paid. A misconception is that all athletic programs in the NCAA make head-over-toe profit. There are three divisions of intercollegiate athletics, and frankly division three athletic programs don’t make as much or have a profit when compared to division one programs. “Critics of paying college athletes note that only a small number of them compete in sports or on teams that actually generate revenue”. (Paying College Athletes) The truth is only a fraction of athletic programs are actually profitable, while most pose a cost to the institution. The question arises primarily in division one programs and typically in the sports of basketball and football. The argument is made that these institutions receive millions of dollars from their student athletes’ performance, in return they should be paid.

After numerous scandals over the past several years of college athletes receiving improper benefits, the question has come up whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. College sports are a growing industry, and we have seen money destroy organizations, teams, and players in this industry.  The determination and motivation of college athletes supersedes professional athletes by their will to win; therefore, college athletes should not be paid.

The debate between if college athletes should get paid by the NCAA and colleges is a hot topic in the country. Everyone has an opinion on the topic but fact is that there’s a lot of positivity if college athletes are paid. Some of the positive things that come with college athletes receiving royalties are that they are financially stable, players stay in college longer, and limits corruption. College athletes should be paid. First Many players come from different backgrounds and have different financial situations.

The dispute about whether college athletes should be paid or not is a continuing argument that will continue to make people bump heads for many years to come. Many people believe that it's truly unfair for college athletes to bring revenue for their college and not receive any percentage of the revenue. For example, many athletes and fellow spectators believe that jersey sales should go back to the athlete that represents the jersey. However, there are many questions to be answered and I believe college athletes should not be paid more than they already are.

The first reason that athletes should be paid is that most of the money that a school makes comes from the athletes. Profits should be shared among those that actually do most of the work. A writer for Huffington Post writes, “As Rodney Fort, a sports economist and professor of sports management at the University of Michigan, succinctly put it, ‘The money is already there.’ The NCAA alone brought in nearly a billion dollars in revenue in its most recent financial year, and top-tier athletic programs regularly bring in tens of millions of dollars as well.(Strachan, 2015).” This quote states that the NCAA makes enough money and they can afford to pay their players. But aside from being affordable, what is also worth noting is that all current school athletes receive zero financial compensation for playing. Sports injuries are a real risk that these athletes take on every day. It is a risk that is not financially compensated by the school. A writer for Business Insider states, “In 2014, the ten schools that made the most money in college sports averaged $144.8 million in athletics revenue, $132.5 million more than the average those schools spent on scholarships, $12.4 million.(Gaines, 2015).” This quote states another reason why college athletes should be paid: schools make much more money than they spend on scholarships and the schools should use the remaining money to pay their players. Instead of using that money, they set that money aside to help pay for high administration salary and raises. Most of the

Although coaches and staff can make millions of dollars, student athletes are playing sports but are students first; therefore student athletes should not be paid. They already receive payment by receiving scholarships, in many cases were college is already paid for. Colleges in different financial situations might have more or less of the ability of actually paying their

To start off, let’s talk about why college athletes shouldn’t get paid. Let’s start off by saying that only professionals in any field show be paid. It doesn’t matter if you’re a football player, a teacher, a coach anything, you should not get paid until you are officially a professional. It takes years to become a professional in any field.

Although researches think college players shouldn't be paid. Some of the college athletes think they should be paid. College athletes should be paid for playing college sports. Cause they don't no money, no job, and they risk getting hurt. College athletes shouldn't be paid for playing sports. Cause their scholarship is already paid for. Because they chose to play that sport. There is a whelming amount of supporting evidence about should athletes be paid.

There has been a recent debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe they should get paid, but many others believe they should not be paid. College athletes should not be paid because the students should worry about their education, it is an extracurricular activity, and the Ncaa does not approve of it.

The issue of whether college athletes should be paid is a topic that has been long debated, from the very inception of college sports in the 1920s. The NCAA considers college athletes to be amateur athletes and not professionals, this means that they should only be playing for the love of sport and not anything else. The dictionary definition of an amateur is “one who engages in a pursuit, study, science, or sport as a pastime rather than as a profession” (Merriam-Webster). College athletes are supposed to make education their number one priority, with sports being a past time for them. In the real world, ranking an athlete’s priorities can get very difficult, an NLRB probe ruled that:

athletes be paid would help with poverty, help pay other costs scholarships don't cover, and also

I believe that college athletes should not get paid. They may play the same sport as the pros but they may not put in all the time and effort to get there.