Analysis: The Cuban Embargo

On an island far, far, away, are oppressed, poor, and hopeless people who have been under the subjugate control of a regime of communist dictators for over half a century. A body of people, who for almost 55 years, have been given the cold shoulder by one of the world’s biggest superpower and the only superpower in close proximity to their own island. The U.S. implemented sanctions on Cuba in 1960 and 1961, with President John F. Kennedy making the embargo official in 1962. The embargo was placed on Cuba during the reign of Fidel Castro because Cuba nationalized American owned Cuban oil refineries without compensation as well as instigated several national security conflicts, such as the Cuban missile crisis, which was spurred by their alliance with the Soviet Union. The issue now stands today on whether America should lift the embargo on Cuba. The lift of this embargo will affect the United States’ international diplomacy, cause an economic boost in Cuba due to the new import and export of goods with the United States. Along with a possible immigration reform for Cubans wanting to move to the United States, and Americans wanting to emigrate to Cuba. There are an incredible amount of problems for the people of Cuba, a lift of the embargo would greatly improve their quality of life. The United States should lift the embargo with the communist state of Cuba,

The embargo has constrained the crossing of the borders for Cuban citizens, the exiles of Cuba and the businesses, its subsidiary to not be able to do their business in Cuba without facing penalties. This embargo has forbid the Cuban citizens’ contact to consumer goods that the United States presented. Cuba’s expansion of its infrastructure has also been limited therefore the country continues to be a poor country.

Embargoes are restrictions on trade between countries used to achieve some kind of goal. The United States has imposed an embargo on Cuba to encourage the Cuban government to change the way they run themselves because the United States does not agree with the system of government they have in place. This embargo enacts total restrictions on trade and travel between the United States and Cuba. The United States’ embargo against Cuba should be lifted because it is doing more harm than good to both countries involved.

This article details the history of the Cuban embargo, tracing its evolution as a tool of retaliation for the seizure of American property, as a weapon in the Cold War against the Soviet Union and its Cuban allies, and finally as an instrument of American policy for the promotion of democracy and human rights. The article then examines the actual impact of the embargo on human rights in Cuba today and highlights the contradiction between the embargo’s avowed political purpose and legal rationale-the promotion of human rights-and its actual consequences, which are harmful to human rights generally. The article suggests that, by harming Cubans ' economic, social, educational, cultural, and family rights, the embargo violates basic norms widely

Heading the wrong way made Douglas "Wrong Way" Corrigan famous. When he filed his flight plan to fly from New York to California and wound up in Ireland there was much celebrity and very little downside for him. The US, may not be as lucky with our embargo policy towards Cuba. A policy that may have a major impact on the US, both domestically and internationally, is truly only actively discussed in the swing state of Florida. Is the US heading in the wrong direction with this policy? Certainly the author thinks so, and if he's right it's not likely that we'll receive a ticker tape parade at the end of journey like Corrigan did.

The Cuban embargo was set up in October 1962 by President John F. Kennedy. Cubans’ name for the embargo, ‘el bloqueo’ meaning ‘the blockade’, is arguably more fitting rather than ‘embargo’ which is what the United States call it. This is because the U.S policy aims to limit other countries from engaging in business with Cuba. John F. Kennedy began the embargo with the intention of punishing Fidel Castro’s management of allowing the storage of Soviet nuclear weapons in Cuba. The embargo aimed to reform the communist system, encourage democracy and to improve human rights in Cuba. However, the embargo did not accomplish this. Instead it imposed unselective hardship on the Cuban population and because of it, the Cuban government had an excuse

USA Today says that there is no reason to believe that a continuation of sanctions on Cuba will hasten the regime's demise or make life better for the Cuban people. This embargo has also harmed the Cuban people and lifting it will improve their lives. This embargo, in reality, has impoverished the Cuban people. Sanctions have harmed the Cuban people without weakening Castro's grip on power and have caused economic harm to the point that it is a human rights violation. This has made it far more expensive for Cuba to produce the food for its citizens. Likewise, lifting the embargo will improve the lives of Cubans. In this situation, engagement is the best way to produce change. Sen. Jeff Flake said it is time for Congress to take the next step of weakening or even better, ending the economic embargo on Cuba. Only congress can do this. Furthermore, the economy will improve in Cuba which will help decrease many of these human rights issues. Tourism will increase in

The embargo will not eradicate Castro’s government, but it has economic effects that harms the people of Cuba. Historically the embargo has been an obstacle in the development of Cuba’s domestic economic activities. With the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Cuba lost their major means of economic support: An article published on the American Journal of Public Health confirms that in 1989 “The 60% Decline in Cuba's Gross domestic product is one of the steepest ever recorded” (Garfield and Santana 15). This drastic worsening of the economic conditions in Cuba was the catalyst for tightening the embargo: The Cuban Democracy Act was approved by Washington on 1992. This Act banned all trade of food and medications of USA companies with Cuba, and it prohibit ships from other countries to dock in American ports until six months after visiting the Island. The Act declares that severe monetary penalties will be implemented to those that violate the mentioned regulations. These economic sanctions are one of the causes why Cubans have had to deal with shortage, and high prices for food and other goods. Cuba could buy the majority of this products from the USA market, but instead has to pay higher transportation prices to get them from farther countries. An article published on the independent general medical journal The Lancet corroborates: “Tightening of the embargo lead to an abrupt cessation of supplies of food and medicine to Cuba

he Juviels live in Havana under extreme poverty due to the economic embargo that the United States has had on Cuba for over 50 years. Megan had to fly all the way to Cuba to acquire a lung cancer vaccine which was made by Cuba and cannot be imported into the United States due to the economic embargo. Sun-Maid Growers, a dried fruit company, wants to buy their mangoes from Cuba which is 90 miles away but instead they are forced to acquire them from Thailand which is 8000 miles away (Linthicum, par. 2). These Three examples show that isolating Cuba causes more harm than good. A lot of people have realized this and after 50 years of a failed policy many people want change in the way we deal with Cuba, and that makes this topic highly controversial.

In light of the Cuban embargo, it is easy to see that it is hurting the citizens of Cuba. Cubans are denied access to things we, in the United States, couldn’t imagine living without. They don’t have access to modern technology,

The U.S. embargo against the exporting or importing of goods to Cuba is a complicated governmental issue that has been in place for over 50 years. The Cold War began when hostile relations existed between the U.S. and Russia; and began when Russia funneled money into Cuba in which the U.S. reacted by dropping the purchase of sugar and Cuba retaliated by claiming oil refineries (Daniels, Radebaugh, & Sullivan, 2015, p.252-253). Recently the U.S. administration has begun lifting parts of the embargo in part as to develop better relations with Cuba and increase Cuba’s weakened economy. The ability for Cuba and entrepreneurs to import and export goods in and out of Cuba will increase their economy and the resident’s standard of living.

Considering the circumstances of the embargo, Cuba has been able to sustain itself working around the minimum number of products they could get. Due to all the difficulties and not being able to trade with the United States, Cuba had to learn to stand on its own... the fact that they were limited in resources, forced by their circumstances, the Cuban people had to take their creativity and transform it into a survival skill. The embargo in a way brought a great deal of evolution to the

To wrap things up are restrictions on capital streams. With the exception of breaking points on settlements by Cuban-Americans, the vast majority of these stay set up; they have generous effects on both nations and there are a mixture of economic, legitimate and political impediments to their disposal. A portion of the restrictions hardest to change are now and then even disregarded as essential parts of the ban. For instance, this is the situation concerning the prerequisite that U.S. Executives restrict affirmation of Cuba to the IFIs, which restricts Cuba's capacity to acquire gives and credits from these establishments. These restrictions are so hard to change politically on both sides that even some U.S. researchers thoughtful to the lifting

It’s the first time after 55 years of the campaign of the embargo. Finally, Cuba and the U.S. reopen embassies in each other’s country in 2015. Despite Castro regime has not been improvement its human right, both sides of citizens are expecting the U.S authority repeals its economic embargo from Cuba someday. Besides, under the Cuba DATA Act, congress allows telecommunications and internet firms provide their services in Cuba which are maintained tight censorship of networks. By providing Cubans more internet access to connect with the world, the U.S. authority wishes it would help for giving pressure to the Castro regime.

The economic interest of the Unites States greatly outweighs the benefit of maintaining a Cuban Embargo and should be the motive for its repeal. The intent of the original embargo was to prevent the Castro regime from assuming power and to deter foreign investment. Both of these initiatives have failed and the consequences of a decades old embargo land squarely on the general population of Cuba and the business interests of the Unites States. American business have much to gain with the removal of the Cuban Embargo. Business opportunities abound in the agriculture market, banking sector, medical field, and construction industries.