Analysis: The Water Pollution Acts (1977) And The EPA Act

When you think of problems in the world today, water pollution isn’t one that would normally come up. In fact it is one of the worst problems in the world today. Water pollution, by definition, is the contamination of streams, lakes, underground water, bays, or oceans by any substances harmful to living things. All living things contain water and most need water to survive, so water pollution is a big problem. If severe, the pollution can kill off birds, fish, and any animals that use the water source. In some cases even killing an entire species.

Furthermore, the Shore Protection Act is applicable to the transportation of municipal and commercial waste in coastal waters aiming to minimize debris from being deposited into coastal waters from inadequate waste handling procedures by waste transporting vessels (Laws That Protect). The Center for Biodiversity had petitioned the EPA to begin regulating plastics as a pollutant under The Clean Water Act- a crucial first step in reducing the amount of plastic. The Clean Water Act is the nation's strongest law protecting water quality. Recognition of plastic pollution under the clean water act enables states to develop water-quality standards to finally begin curbing the amount of plastic dumped in the oceans.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) was created in response the rapid loss of clean water. The government wanted to restore and preserve the water, as much of it was no longer useable for consumption or recreational use. A lot of this was due to agricultural runoff which lead to a surplus of phosphorus and nitrogen in many waters. (Tim Martins)

I would like to offer my comments involving an EPA regulation and how it can be improved. I believe that the Safe Drinking Water Act is not producing water that is safe enough for all Americans to drink, while leading many to believe that the water that they are drinking is as clean as possible. This is shown very clearly by the water that is produced in Flint, Michigan. This water is visibly discolored by the lead and other contaminants that are in the water and there a=have been many reports of children and adults who are suffering some serious symptoms of lead-poisoning. Despite these very real negative effects of the lack of proper filterage of this water, there is very little that can be done because the water technically meets the standards that are put out by the Safe Drinking and Water Act.

Regulations. Government directives to municipalities and industrial sectors towards efficient reuse and resource recovery from wastewater.

The Rio Grande River is currently on the 303(d) list of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The lower Sub-Basin from International Falcon Reservoir downstream to the Gulf of Mexico is lacking infrastructure to adequately handle the environmental consequences of human and industrial waste generation and disposal on the U. S side in locations such as Harlingen, TX. The Rio Grande is mostly affected by the high volumes of dissolved solids, such as salinity and bacteria. The U.S is working to introduce a common set of standards that can be agreed on by both countries.

We all know there is something in the water. In June 1969, there was an oil slick on the Cuyahoga River which was a turning point in American attitudes about water pollution. It wasn't the first time a U.S. river had caught fire; the Cuyahoga had already burned nine times since the Civil War but it came at a time when environmental issues were already in the

The EPA works hand in hand with each state to organize and plan varies types of federal environmental programs. Each state is given the authority to oversee the federal programs as along as they encompass laws and guidelines that are at least as strict as the federal laws that are in place. The EPA has to have constant contact with state officials in order to develop health, agricultural and environmental protocols for any studies that may need improvement to meet the necessary requirements for decreasing toxics or pollution. Even though the state has control over certain aspects of the Clean Air Act they still have to comply with federal laws that are in place regarding any drinking water, storm water, waste water or solid

The Clean Water Act (CWA) founds the elementary structure for regulating releases of contaminants into the water bodies of the US and also for surface waters it regulates quality standards. The origin of the CWA was passed in 1948 and was named the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, then the Act was suggestively reorganized and prolonged in 1972. as "Clean Water Act" this became the Act 's communal name after amendments in 1972.Further down to CWA, EPA has applied other pollution control agendas such as for industry, the setting wastewater standards. We similarly have set some water quality standards for all pollutants in surface waters.

Context: Following a 5-year consultation period that Innergex participated in, the BC government passed the Water Sustainability Act in 2014. The Act provides a comprehensive framework for water use and modernizes water laws by:

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) define the (MCLG) as a minimum level of a contaminant or pollutant concentration in the drinking water below which there is no harmful effect or expected risk to human health. Also, (MCLG) is non-enforceable public health goal. As for (MCL) is the maximum level of a contaminant or pollutant concentration that is permissible in the drinking water. Also, (MCL) is enforceable standard that is set as close to the (MCLG) as possible, by using the best available treatment technology (to ensure control of a contaminant) and taking cost into the consideration. It is good to know, that the contaminant concentration will contain all inorganic substance, organic substance, and microorganism.

Physico-chemical methods such as chemical precipitation, chemical oxidation or reduction, filtration, ion exchange, electrochemical treatment, reverse osmosis, membrane technology and evaporation recovery have been widely used to remove heavy metal ions. These technologies usually produce wastes with high concentrations of metals which are a significant source of environmental pollution. Furthermore, the above methods may be ineffective or expensive, especially when the heavy metal concentrations

Before the twenty first century the United States government pass laws that have been beneficial to water pollution. The earliest action that the government took in regards to water pollution is the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948. Which was the first major U.S. law to address water pollution. According to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act article this act was passed to eliminate or reduce pollution that was carried on between state's water and to improve sanitary conditions of surface and underground water. The act would have had a positive impact on the state because it was going to eliminate water pollution in all the states. This act did not succeed, in 1972 they had to modified it adding amendments to it calling it the Clean Water Act. According to the article, History of the Clean Water Act this act was pass to eliminate the pollutant that are in the nation’s surface waters including lakes, river, streams, wetlands, and coastal areas. This demonstrate that the government does take charge of this issue because they kept modifying the act when it did not succeed. In 1990 Congress passed the Pollution Prevention Act. According to the Pollution Prevention Act article it states that they want to increase the interested in reducing pollution or preventing it. According to this act it is the policy of the U.S. to prevent or reduce pollution. If they can not prevent pollution then the should treat the environment in a safe manner. In conclusion all of these

- Energy savings by reducing the use of elec-tricity in office buildings and fuel by persuading employees to use alternative energy, both NGV and gasohol.

the treatment of wastewaters released to the environment by industry. A significant effort has been