Analysis of Financial Performance of Pz Cussons 2012

Chester Inc. is a client of SNHU, LLC who prepares the financial statements and financial analysis for Chester Inc. This report will detail several key items including the accounting effects of international expansion as it relates to differences between Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the United States standards, and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the standards that would govern a portion of the financial reporting with an international expansion. This report will also review the financial performance of Chester Inc. Additionally; it will use ratio analysis to compare Chester Inc. with two of its main competitors.

The current ratios within the years 2013-2014 have improved for JB Hi Fi in 2013 as it stood at 1.27:1 whereas in 2014 it had increased it’s performance to 1.64:1. This has improved due to the current liabilities being reduced in 2014, which lead to the improvement of the total current assets. This ratio is mainly used to give an idea of the company’s ability to pay back its liabilities within its assets, which includes cash, inventory and receivables. In 2014 it showed a higher current ratio, which demonstrates that the company is more than capable in paying its debts. This gives a sense of efficiency of a company’s operating cycle to turn its product into cash. In the financial report the shareholders use this ratio in determining whether

ACC/291 March 25,2012   Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio: Current Assets/Current Liabilities 2005 $14,555,092/ $6,974,752= 2.09:1 2004 $14,643,456/ $6,029,696=2.43:1 Acid Test Ratio: Cash+ Short-Term Investments + Receivables (Net)/ Current Liabilities 2005 $305,563 + $283,583 +$6,133,663/ $6,974,752= .96:1 2004 $357,216 + $133,504 + $5,775,104/ $6,029,696=1.04:1 Receivables Turnover: Net Credit Sales/ Average Net Receivables 2005 $50,823,685/ ($6,133,663 + 5,775,104/2) $50,823,685/ $5,954,384= 8.54 times 2004 $46,044,288/($5,775,104+6,569,344/2) $46,044,288/ $6,172,224=7,46 times Inventory Turnover: Cost of Goods Sold/ Average Inventory 2005 $42,037,624/ ($7,850,970+$7,854,112/2) $42,037,624/$7,852,541=5.35 times

The primary objective of this report is to provide a financial performance analysis of Marks & Spencer group plc. This will be achieved by a detailed ratio analysis on financial data available in latest annual report of the company for the year ended March-2013. The attention during ratio analysis will be on horizontal and vertical analysis as well as the comparison of these ratios with the industry. Moreover, the report will also give a brief business analysis of the company.

First of which, is the current ratio. It has been rapidly declining since 2000. To me this indicates that there is a liquidity issue. Each year their trade debt increase exceeds the increase of net income for the company. As a result, the working capital has taken a nosedive from $58,650 in 2002 to only $5,466 in 2003.

A more tell tale sign is the quick ratio, or acid test, which has increased year after year. Debt to total assets has decreased over 5% since 2001, indicating less financing of current and long term debt and more company assets. Their cash debt coverage far surpasses the ideal 20%, indicating a high level of solvency with sufficient funds and assets to satisfy all debtors. Asset turnover has more or less maintained at right around 1.6, signifying a turnover rate of just less than 180 times per year.

Increase in current liabilities Substantial increase in current liabilities weakened the company’s liquidity position. Its current liabilities were US$2,063.94 million at the end of FY2010, a 48.09% increase compared to the previous year. However, its current assets recorded a marginal increase of 25.07% - from US$1,770.02 million at the end of FY2009 to US$2,213.72 million at the end of FY2010. Following this, the company’s current ratio declined from 1.27 at the end of the FY2009 to 1.07 at the end of FY2010. A lower current ratio indicates that the company is in a weak financial position, and it may find it difficult to meet its day-to-day obligations.

Colgate-Palmolive Co (CP) was an international leader in household and personal care product, with the sales of $6.06 billion and profit of $2.76 billion in 1991. CP set up a five-year plan in 1991, pointing out that company needed to focus on new product launching and entry into new geographic markets by improving the manufacturing, distribution and the continuance of the core consumer products. Started from 1984, CP’s CEO awaked the company from “sleepy and inefficient” to profitable. Both gross margin and annual volume growth increased from 1985. Although everything seemed good, CP was facing the worldwide strong competitions from other companies. In order to have some protections, 170 CP’s

The Bank’s Tier 1, Total capital, and Assets-to-Capital multiple ratios were 13.0%,16.0%, and 17.2%, respectively, on October 31, 2011, compared with 12.2%, 15.5%, and 17.5%, respectively, on October 31, 2010.(Refer to Appendix 2) These changes over the period were influenced by increases in Tier 1 capital and Risk Weighted Assets. Risk Weighted Assets

Return on Total Assets was 4.43% which is below five percent. That indicates that the company is not accurately converting its assets into profit. The total for Return on Stockholders’ Equity was 8.89%, however financial analysts prefer ROE to range between 15-20 %. The company’s low ROE indicates that the company is not generating profit with new investments. Lastly, Debt-to-Equity ratio for the company was 1.01 which indicates that investors and creditors are equally sharing assets. In the view of creditors, they see a high ratio as a risk factor because it can indicate that investors are not investing due to the company’s overall performance. The totals of these three ratios demonstrate that the company’s financial state is not as healthy as it should be.

Based on Next Annual Report and Account January (2011), the chief executive's review present the A New Normal of company overview, due to the changing consumer environment, Next PLC need to have New avenues of growth, and brand new way to control cost, also, it will be important that retailer have to generate the healthy cash flow with cautious management. Furthermore, enable to know how company efficiently use asset to generate revenue and whether there was improvement between 2010 and 2011, the activity ratios have to calculate out. The ROCE in 2010 and 2011 were 38.91%,41.79%, this number showed how profit generated by capital employed, and the growth figure of ROCE lead to level up efficiency asset used.((NEXT PLC, 2011 page43, 45) The figure for inventory turnover, receivable turnover, and payable turnover in 2010 and 2011 were 46.81 days, 54.98 days; 66.07days, 68.23 days; 83.36days,81.3days; respectively. (ibid) It is clearly show that the inventory and receivable turnover in 2010 was taken lesser day than 2011, in which means inventories took less day to sold out to costumer and the cash credit receive more faster than the 2011, besides, the payable turnover had longer period than 2011, it was also a good example to illustrate that there was more cash flow holding by company, and the overall image of these figure present that the resource had been

The main issue of the P&G Korea case is centered around the question of market share. P&G and Unilever are the two major market shareholders in the Korean detergent industry holding 80-85% of the total market share. The remaining 15-20% of the market is held by low-priced local Korean brands. There are no new markets either company can tap for further market share since most Korean households already use laundry detergent, making the market saturated. Other than peripheral chemical changes claimed to be “improvements”, there are no major innovations to be explored for product development or diversification. Per Ansoff’s strategic opportunities matrix, P&G and Unilever are both focused on Market Penetration,

In this assignment, I have chosen Burberry as the company to report. Burberry is one of the global luxury brand leader with a long history. It operates in three regions, Asia Pacific, Europe , Middle East, India and Africa (EMEIA) and Americas. I am interested in the firm’s performance in recent years. I am going to measure and analysis the performance of the corporate through Annual report 2015/16 and 2016/17 which published on 06-06-16 and 06-06-17 respectively.

The Procter & Gamble business strategy is to focus on creating new brands and categories so the company can focus on being the best in branding, innovation and scale. This is what sets this company apart from many of its competitors. The Proctor and Gamble are the global leader in all of their core businesses within the company which consists of laundry, baby care, hair care and feminine protection. This report is designed to understand the company’s business model and strategies, and analysis how the P&G has formulated its business-level strategies to pursue its business model.

The third ratio is the CFO/CL ratio (short-term debt coverage), which shows what part of the company’s short-term liabilities can be payed by its most liquid asset – cash. GSK’s average meaning of the CFO/CL was 0,64 This is a good showing, because it proves that GSK uses its cash effectively, since if the company’s cash ratio equals 1 it means that company has too much cash in reserves During years 2005-2007 the CFO/CL ratio changed very slightly, but in 2008 ratio increased to 0,72, probably because GSK has faced increase in derivative financial instruments, inventories and receivables, which happened due to the strengthening of overseas currencies In